Finding the Domination Number of Amalgamations of Paths and Cycles at Connected Subgraphs

Main Article Content

Sayan Panma
Prakassawat Boonmee

Abstract

Let ๐›พ(๐บ) denote the domination number of a graph ๐บ. Let ๐บ1,๐บ2 be disjoint graphs with two subgraphs ๐ป1, ๐ป2, respectively such that there is a graph isomorphism ๐‘“ from ๐ป1 to ๐ป2. The amalgamation of ๐บ1and ๐บ2at ๐ป1 and ๐ป2with respect to ๐‘“ is the graph ๐บ = ๐บ1 โ—โ–ท ๐บ2ย  obtained by forming the disjoint union of ๐บ1 and ๐บ2 and then identifying ๐ป1 and ๐ป2 with respect to ๐‘“ . A graph ๐ป is called a clone of ๐บ if ๐ปgif.latex?\cong๐ป1gif.latex?\cong ๐ป2. In this case, ๐บ is called an amalgamation of ๐บ1and ๐บ2at ๐ป. Denote ๐‘ƒ๐‘Ÿ and ๐ถ๐‘ก the path and cycle of order ๐‘Ÿ and ๐‘ก โ‰ฅ 3, respectively. In this research paper, our primary focus lies in investigating the domination number of the amalgamation ๐‘ƒ๐‘Ÿ โ—โ–ท ๐ถ๐‘ก, with the condition that ๐ป1gif.latex?\congH2 gif.latex?\congPs. We approach this problem by employing congruence properties modulo 3. For cases where ๐‘  โˆˆ {1, 2, min{๐‘Ÿ, ๐‘ก}}, we utilize these congruence properties to identify a minimum dominating set and determine the domination number ofย  ๐‘ƒ๐‘Ÿ โ—โ–ท ๐ถ๐‘ก . However, for ๐‘  โˆˆ {3, 4, . . . , min{๐‘Ÿ, ๐‘ก} โˆ’ 1}, we take a different approach. We construct a graph denoted as ๐‘ƒ๐ถ(๐›ผ, ๐›ฝ, ๐œŒ, ๐œ†) usingย  ย  four paths, namely ๐‘ƒ๐›ผ, ๐‘ƒ๐›ฝ, ๐‘ƒ๐œŒ, ๐‘ƒ๐œ†. We then establish that ๐‘ƒ๐‘Ÿ โ—โ–ท ๐ถ๐‘ก gif.latex?\cong๐‘ƒ๐ถ(๐›ผ, ๐›ฝ, ๐œŒ, ๐œ†) for some ๐›ผ โˆˆ {0, 1, . . . , ๐‘Ÿ}, ๐›ฝ = ๐‘  โˆ’ 2, ๐œŒ = ๐‘ก โˆ’ ๐‘ , and ๐œ† = ๐‘Ÿ โˆ’ (๐›ผ + ๐‘ ). Having established this correspondence, we proceed to determine the domination number ๐›พ(๐‘ƒ๐‘Ÿ โ—โ–ท ๐ถ๐‘ก) using the corresponding value of ๐›พ(๐‘ƒ๐ถ(๐›ผ, ๐›ฝ, ๐œŒ, ๐œ†)). This approach allows us to gain valuable insights into the domination number of the amalgamation and explore the intricate relationships between these graph structures.

Article Details

How to Cite
Panma, S., & Boonmee, P. (2023). Finding the Domination Number of Amalgamations of Paths and Cycles at Connected Subgraphs. Science & Technology Asia, 28(3), 59โ€“81. retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SciTechAsia/article/view/248629
Section
Physical sciences

References

C. Berge, Theory of graphs and its applications, Dunod, Paris, (1958).

O. Ore, Theory of Graphs, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloquium Pub., Amer. Math. Soc.,Providence. Rhode Island, 38(1962), 206-12.

E. Cockayne, S. Hedetniemi, Towards a theory of domination in graphs, Networks Fall, (1977), 247-61.

T. W. Haynes, S. T. Hedetniemi, P. J. Slater, Fundamentals of dominations in graphs, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1998.

S. Klaviar, N. Seifter, Dominating Cartesian products of cycles, Discrete Applied Mathematics, 59 (1995), 129-36.

R. Chรฉrifi, S. Gravier, X. Lagraula, C.Payan, I. Zigham, Domination number of cross products of paths, Discrete Appl. Math., 94(1999), 101-39.

C. Uiyyasathian, Maximal-Clique Partitions, PhD Thesis, University of Colorado at Denver, 2003.

C. Promsakon, C. Uiyyasathian, Chromatic Numbers of Glued Graphs, Thai Journal of Mathematics, Special Issue (Annual Meeting in Mathematics)(2006), 75-81.

P. Boonmee , J. Ma-In , S. Panma , Domination Numbers of Amalgamations of Cycles at Connected Subgraphs, Journal of Mathematics, (2022).