Seismic Retrofitting of Steel Brace Frames Using Different Bracing Configurations

Authors

  • Ekkaphong Wiriyaphanit นักศึกษา หลักสูตรวิศวกรรมศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต สาขาวิชาวิศวกรรมโยธา คณะวิศวกรรมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น
  • Natthapong Areemit รองศาสตราจารย์ ภาควิชาวิศวกรรมโยธา คณะวิศวกรรมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น

Keywords:

Push-over analysis, Steel structure, Seismic retrofit

Abstract

In many regions, old structures might be designed to withstand only gravitational loads due to lack of information about seismic risk. However, with more seismic records available, seismic design requirements had been incorporated into recent design codes. Many buildings which were designed according to outdated codes might need seismic performance evaluation, as well as, seismic upgrading, if needed. In this study, a steel frame structure, which was designed according to outdated codes, was evaluated for its seismic performance. Push-over analysis was performed to evaluate seismic capacity of the structure and its performance level. Three retrofit schemes were proposed and compared. The results showed that the Retrofit-A, in which an additional span of the chevron brace was added, improved lateral stiffness of the structure. The Retrofit-B, in which all bracings were changed to concentric, showed improvement in ductility and stiffness. The Retrofit-C, in which all bracings were enlarged, showed similar behavior as the Retrofit A.

References

NRCC. National Building Code of Canada (NBCC), 8th ed. Ottawa, ON, Canada: National Research Council of Canada (NRCC); 1980.

NRCC. National Building Code of Canada (NBCC), 13th ed. Ottawa, ON, Canada: National Research Council of Canada (NRCC); 2015.

Rai D C, Goel.S C.“Seismic Evaluation and Upgrading of Chevron Braced Frames.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 59(8): 971–94 ; 2003.

Mottier, Paul, Robert Tremblay, and Colin Rogers. “Seismic Retrofit of Low-Rise Steel Buildings in Canada Using Rocking Steel Braced Frames.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 47(2): 333–35 ; 2018.

Nassani, Dia Eddin, Ali Khalid Hussein, and Abbas Haraj Mohammed. “Comparative Response Assessment of Steel Frames With Different Bracing Systems Under Seismic Effect.” Structures 11(June): 229–22 ; 2017.

Balazadeh-Minouei, Yasaman, Robert Tremblay, and Sanda Koboevic. “Seismic Retrofit of an Existing 10-Story Chevron-Braced Steel-Frame.” Journal of Structural Engineering 144(10): 04018180 ; 2018.

FEMA 440, Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Applied Technology Council (ATC-55 Project), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 2006.

American Society of Civil Engineers. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing building, ASCE 41-13. Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers ; 2014.

ATC 40, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Applied Technology Council, Redwood, CA, USA, 1996.

American Society of Civil Engineers. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures, ASCE/SEI 7-16. Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers ; 2016.

CSI. SAP2000 Ultimate, Version 21. Berkeley, California: Computers and Structures, Inc; 2019.

Federal emergency management agency (FEMA). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Reston, Virginia: Federal Emergency Management Agency ; 2000.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-19

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย