Development and Validation of the Knowledge Assessment Tool for New Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Authors

  • Pairot Khusakul Student, Master of Pharmacy Program in Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University
  • Reelanin Inthuwong Students, Doctor of Pharmacy Program, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University
  • Pancheewa Pratummet Students, Doctor of Pharmacy Program, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University
  • Teerapat Yindeesuk Students, Doctor of Pharmacy Program, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University
  • Kasidet Nikonpitakkul Students, Doctor of Pharmacy Program, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University
  • Wannee Chaichalermpong Assistant Professor, Division of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University
  • Siriporn Jantharuechai Pharmacy, Queen Sirikit Heart Center of the Northeast
  • Chaiyasith Wongvipaporn Assistant Professor, Division of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
  • Verawan Uchaipichat Associate Professor, Division of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University

Keywords:

New oral anticoagulant, Patient knowledge, Knowledge assessment tool development

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to develop and validate a tool to assess the knowledge of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients on the use of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs).  The research was divided into two phases.  Phase 1 was the tool development to assess anticoagulation knowledge in AF patients.  Phase 2 was the tool validation in the aspects of content validity (in 6 experts), and reliability and item difficulty (in 30 patients).  The multiple-choice assessment tool contained twenty-three questions with six dimensions including basic drug information, adverse drug reactions, medication administration, drug-drug interactions, laboratory monitoring, and self-care and lifestyle.  Based on the expert evaluation, the tool developed had a scale content validity index of 0.97.  A validity test from the patients showed that the tool had a reliability score of 0.95, and the average difficulty of each dimension of the question ranged from 0.22 to 0.96.  The tool developed in this study to evaluate knowledge regarding NOAC use in AF patients met the quality criteria for content validity and reliability.  Therefore, it can be employed to assess knowledge in AF patients, enabling the development of educational guidance for patient counseling.

References

Albertsen IE, Rasmussen LH, Overvad TF, Graungaard T, Larsen TB, Lip GY. Risk of stroke or systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation patients treated with warfarin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013; 44(5): 1329-1336.

Hindricks G, Potpara T, Kirchhof P, Kühne M, Ahlsson A, Balsam P, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European heart journal. 2021; 42(5): 373-498.

Suwanwela NC, Chutinet A, Autjimanon H, Ounahachok T, Decha-umphai C, Chockchai S, et al. Atrial fibrillation prevalence and risk profile from novel community-based screening in Thailand: A prospective multi-centre study. IJC Heart & Vasculature [Online] 2021; 32(2): 1-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100709

Al-Momany NH, Makahleh ZM, Al-Omari NA, Al-Sarayreh HA, Momani RO. Analysis of Factors That Interrupt With INR Control in the First Anticoagulation Clinic Monitoring Jordanian Patients. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis [Online] 2019; 25(8): 1-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029619870252

Ansell J, Hirsh J, Hylek E, Jacobson A, Crowther M, Palareti G. Pharmacology and Management of the Vitamin K Antagonists American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008; 133(6): 160-198.

Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, Hoffman EB, Deenadayalu N, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis of randomised trials. The Lancet. 2014; 383(3): 955-962.

Viola R, Fekete H, Csoka I. Patients’ knowledge on oral anticoagulant treatment in Hungary. International journal of clinical pharmacy. 2017; 39(6): 1265-1272.

Davis NJ, Billett HH, Cohen HW, Arnsten JH. Impact of adherence, knowledge, and quality of life on anticoagulation control. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2005; 39(4): 632-636.

Hernández Madrid A, Potpara TS, Dagres N, Chen J, Larsen TB, Estner H, et al. Differences in attitude, education, and knowledge about oral anticoagulation therapy among patients with atrial fibrillation inEurope: result of a self-assessment patient survey conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association. EP Europace. 2016; 18(3): 463-467.

Calvin H, Kerstin H, Jeffrey I. Overview of the new oral anticoagulants: opportunities and

challenges. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2015; 35(5): 1056–1065.

Loharattanakong P, Ritthiboon P, Hongrinya Y, Chaichun M, Taksinachanekij S, Uchaipichat V. Warfarin using knowledge and international normalized ratio goal control in outpatients of Queen

Sirikit Heart Center of the Northeast. Srinagarind Medical Journal. 2016; 31(3): 257-265.

Udomdachanut P, Wongruttanachai A, Sakunrag I. Development of the Warfarin Knowledge Test in Patients Receiving Warfarin at Pathumthani Hospital. Srinagarind Medical Journal. 2020; 35(3): 272-277.

Metaxas C, Albert V, Stahl M, Hersberger KE, Arnet I. Development and validation of a questionnaire to self-assess patient knowledge of direct oral anticoagulants (KODOA-test). Drug, healthcare and patient safety. 2018; 10(12): 69-77.

Obamiro KO, Chalmers L, Bereznicki LR. Development and validation of an oral anticoagulation knowledge tool (AKT). PLOS One [Online] 2016; 11(6): 1-10 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0158071

Briggs AL, Jackson TR, Bruce S, Shapiro NL. The development and performance validation of a tool to assess patient anticoagulation knowledge. Research in social and administrative Pharmacy. 2005; 1(1):40-59.

Zeolla MM, Brodeur MR, Dominelli A, Haines ST, Allie ND. Development and validation of an instrument to determine patient knowledge: the oral anticoagulation knowledge test. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2006; 40(4): 633-638.

Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health. 2006; 29(5): 489-497.

Chaichanawirote U, Vantum C. Evaluation of content validity for research instrument. Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences. 2017; 11(2): 105-111.

Pasunon P. Reliability of questionnaire in quantitative research. Parichart Journal. 2014; 27(1): 145-163. Thai.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-08

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย