VA Loading Optimization of a Converter Using the Rao Algorithm for Maximum Utilization of the Unified Power Quality Conditioner

Main Article Content

Swati Gade
Rahul Agrawal

Abstract

In a modern power system, the unified power quality conditioner (UPQC) is considered to be the most effective device for mitigating power quality problems. The use of the dynamic voltage restorer (DVR) for active-reactive power-sharing reduces the loading on the UPQC in all operating conditions, leading to better system efficiency and reliability. The VA loading of the DVC can be controlled by maintaining a proper angle between load and source voltage. In this paper, Rao algorithms are proposed to determine the optimal VA loading of the UPQC using the variable phase angle control method. The primary objective of this study is to determine the optimum angle at which the VA loading of the UPQC is minimum without negotiating the compensation capabilities. To illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology, the results are compared to those for JAYA optimization. This research work will help in the development of an efficient, instantaneous VA loading-based control approach for the UPQC.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gade, S., & Agrawal, R. (2023). VA Loading Optimization of a Converter Using the Rao Algorithm for Maximum Utilization of the Unified Power Quality Conditioner. ECTI Transactions on Electrical Engineering, Electronics, and Communications, 21(1), 248573. https://doi.org/10.37936/ecti-eec.2023211.248573
Section
Publish Article

References

B. Singh, A. Chandra, and K. Al-Haddad, Power Quality: Problems and Mitigation Techniques. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015.

H. Fujita and H. Akagi, “The unified power quality conditioner: the integration of series- and shunt-active filters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 315–322, Mar. 1998.

V. Khadkikar, “Enhancing electric power quality using UPQC: A comprehensive overview,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 2284–2297, May 2012.

S. Gade, R. Agrawal, and R. Munje, “Recent trends in power quality improvement: Review of the unified power quality conditioner,” ECTI Transactions on Electrical Engineering, Electronics, and Communications, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 268–288, Oct. 2021.

W. C. Lee, D. M. Lee, and T. K. Lee, “New control scheme for a unified power-quality compensator-q with minimum active power injection,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1068–1076, Apr. 2010.

V. Khadkikar and A. Chandra, “UPQC-S: A novel concept of simultaneous voltage sag/swell and load reactive power compensations utilizing series inverter of UPQC,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2414–2425, Sep. 2011.

Y. Y. Kolhatkar and S. P. Das, “Experimental investigation of a single-phase UPQC with minimum VA loading,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 373–380, Jan. 2007.

S. Fagundes, F. Cardoso, E. Stangler, F. Neves, and M. Mezaroba, “A detailed power flow analysis of the dual unified power quality conditioner (iUPQC) using power angle control (PAC),” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 192, Mar. 2021, Art. no. 106933.

G. S. Kumar, B. K. Kumar, and M. M. Kumar, “Optimal VA loading of UPQC during mitigation of unbalanced voltage sags with phase jumps in three-phase four-wire distribution system,” in 2010 International Conference on Power System Technology, Zhejiang, China, 2010.

B. B. Ambati and V. Khadkikar, “Optimal sizing of UPQC considering VA loading and maximum utilization of power-electronic converters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1490–1498, Jun. 2014.

J. Ye, H. B. Gooi, and F. Wu, “Optimal design and control implementation of UPQC based on variable phase angle control method,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 3109–3123, Jul. 2018.

J. Ye, H. B. Gooi, X. Zhang, B. Wang, and U. Manandhar, “Two-level algorithm for UPQC considering power electronic converters and transformers,” in 2019 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Anaheim, California, USA, 2019, pp. 3461–3467.

J. Han, X. Li, Y. Sun, D. Luo, and S. Huang, “Optimal operation of UPQC under VA capacity constraints based on hierarchical optimization,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 122, Nov. 2020, Art. no. 106168.

S. Gade, R. Agrawal, D. Patil, and S. Antonov, “Optimal utilization of UPQC at different operating condition using TLBO,” in 56th International Scientific Conference on Information, Communication and Energy Systems and Technologies (ICEST), Sozopol, Bulgaria, 2021, pp. 197–200.

S. Gade and R. Agrawal, “Optimal utilization of unified power quality conditioner using the JAYA optimization algorithm,” Engineering Optimization, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2023.

S. A. Gade and R. Agrawal, “Optimal utilization of UPQC during steady state using evolutionary optimization techniques,” in 2021 International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT), Hubli, India, 2021.

A. Gotmare, S. S. Bhattacharjee, R. Patidar, and N. V. George, “Swarm and evolutionary computing algorithms for system identification and filter design: A comprehensive review,” Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, vol. 32, pp. 68–84, Feb. 2017.

R. V. Rao, “Jaya: A simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems,” International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 19–34, 2016.

R. V. Rao, “Rao algorithms: Three metaphor-less simple algorithms for solving optimization problems,” International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 107–130, 2020.