Performance Evaluation of Free Space Optic (FSO) Technology Using PPM and OOK Modulation

Main Article Content

Fakhriy Hario
Fauza Khair
I Wayan Mustika
Endah Budi Purnomowati
Sigit Kusmaryanto

Abstract

The increasing trend in developing free space optic (FSO) system technology, which is expected to become an alternative for future high-speed wireless communications based on optical communication system, demands comprehensive performance observation of propagation parameters. So, this research proposes an FSO system model using pulse position modulation and on-off keying modulation by considering the influence and reliability of the system on distance, atmospheric conditions, and variations in aperture diameter. The test results include the bit error rate (BER), Q-factor, and optical and electrical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR/ESNR) at a bit rate of 2.5 Gbps. Based on result observations of the reliability of the FSO system using PPM and OOK modulation at a bit rate of 2.5 Gbps and an optical lens diameter of 5 cm, the proposed system model is capable of meeting optical communication standards up to a transmission distance of 1 km. Meanwhile, in testing various atmospheric conditions with an optical lens diameter of 5 cm to a distance of 0.5 km, the system model is suitable for use in light fog, very light fog, and light mist to clear air conditions. However, in this test scenario, the system is not feasible for dense, thick, and moderate fog conditions. Furthermore, observations at a distance of 0.5 km show that by increasing the optical lens aperture diameter from 20 cm to 30 cm, the proposed system model can achieve BER values of less than 10-30 to 10-12 in thick fog conditions. In general, there is no significant difference between system performance, including BER, Q factor, and OSNR and ESNR values, whether using PPM modulation or OOK modulation, where the use of a wavelength of 1330 nm is more recommended than 1550 nm judging from the selected signal to noise ratio value.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hario, F., Khair, F., Mustika, . I. W., Budi Purnomowati, E., & Kusmaryanto, S. (2024). Performance Evaluation of Free Space Optic (FSO) Technology Using PPM and OOK Modulation. ECTI Transactions on Electrical Engineering, Electronics, and Communications, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.37936/ecti-eec.2024222.251756
Section
Communication Systems

References

F. Khair, R. Auliana, and D. Zulherman, “Software-based simulation to analyze the variation of digital modulation and atmospheric condition on the free space optic (FSO) link performance,”Journal INFOTEL, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp 214-219, August 2022, https://doi.org/10.20895/infotel.v14i3.758

J. A. Akinwumi and J. O. Bandele, Free Space Optical Communication : Review Paper, vol. 7, no. 10. 2018.

A. Malik and P. Singh, “Free Space Optics: Current Applications and Future Challenges,” Int. J. Opt., vol. 2015, no. c, 2015, doi: 10.1155/2015/945483.

P. Vanmathi and A. K. T. Sulthana, “Hybrid optical amplifier performance in OAF Using OOK and BPSK modulations,” 2019 Int. Conf. Intell. Comput. Control Syst. ICCS 2019, no. Iciccs, pp. 695–699, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICCS45141.2019.9065900.

T. Youssef Elganimi, “Performance Comparison between OOK, PPM and PAM Modulation Schemes for Free Space Optical (FSO) Communication Systems: Analytical Study,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 22–27, 2013, doi: 10.5120/13786-1838.

A. Sree Madhuri, G. Immadi, V. Mounika, A. T. Teja, T. Aakash, and N. S. Srinivasa, “Performance evaluation of free space optics using different modulation techniques at various link ranges,” Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 834–838, 2019.

F. Imantaqwa, Hambali, and K. Sujatmoko, “Analisis Performasi Subcarrier Intensity Modulation Pada Kanal Model Kim Dan Kruse Di Free Space Optic,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 3518–3525, 2019.

G. A. Mahdiraji and E. Zahedi, “Comparison of selected digital modulation schemes (OOK, PPM and DPIM) for wireless optical communications,” SCOReD 2006 - Proc. 2006 4th Student Conf. Res. Dev. "Towards Enhancing Res. Excell. Reg., no. SCOReD, pp. 5–10, 2006, doi: 10.1109/SCORED.2006.4339297.

Y. Fujiwara, “Self-synchronizing pulse position modulation with error tolerance,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 5352–5362, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TIT.2013.2262094.

H. Shalaby, A. Morra, A. E. Morra, H. S. Khallaf, H. M. H. Shalaby, and S. Member, “Performance Analysis of Both Shot- and Thermal-Noise Limited Multi Pulse PPM Receivers in Gamma,” 2014.

M. Prajapat and C. Selwal, “Free space optical link performance evaluation with different atmospheric conditions at different power and diversity,” 2016 IEEE 7th Power India Int. Conf. PIICON 2016, pp. 135–139, 2017, doi: 10.1109/POWERI.2016.8077165.

X. Fu, G. Chen, T. Tang, Y. Zhao, P. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “Research and simulation of PPM modulation and demodulation system on spatial wireless optical communication,” 2010 Symp. Photonics Optoelectron. SOPO 2010 - Proc., no. 2, pp. 4–8, 2010, doi: 10.1109/SOPO.2010.5504142.

S. Z. Ghassemlooy, Popoola, W., Rajbhandari, Optical Wireless Communications System and Channel Modelling with MATLAB. 2013.

S. R. Patil and V. B. Raskar, “Analysis and Simulation of Relay Assisted Pulse Position Modulation Scheme using UWB System,” vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 170–180, 2015.

M. A. Esmail, H. Fathallah, and M. S. Alouini, “Outdoor FSO Communications under Fog: Attenuation Modeling and Performance Evaluation,” IEEE Photonics J., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1–22, 2016, doi: 10.1109/JPHOT.2016.2592705.

S. A. Zabidi, M. R. Islam, W. Al Khateeb, and A. W. Naji, “Investigating of rain attenuation impact on Free Space Optics propagation in tropical region,” 2011 4th Int. Conf. Mechatronics Integr. Eng. Ind. Soc. Dev. ICOM’11 - Conf. Proc., no. May, 2011, doi: 10.1109/ICOM.2011.5937121.

S. Burdah, R. Alamtaha, O. N. Samijayani, S. Rahmatia, and A. Syahriar, “Performance analysis of Q factor optical communication in free space optics and single mode fiber,” Univers. J. Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 167–175, 2019, doi: 10.13189/ujeee.2019.060311.