Bi-Level DG Optimization in Distribution Networks with TOU Pricing and Demand Response Using MPA

Main Article Content

Trieu Ton Ngoc
Phong Minh Le
Loc Huu Pham
Tan Minh Le

Abstract

This study proposes a bi-level optimization model for the optimal allocation of distributed generation (DG) in active distribution networks, taking into account timeof- use (TOU) electricity pricing and demand response (DR) behavior. The upper level represents the decisionmaking of the distribution system operator (DSO), aiming to minimize power losses, voltage deviations, and DG investment costs. At the lower level, responsive consumers optimize their hourly demand profiles to minimize electricity costs under TOU tariffs, subject to behavioral and operational constraints. To enable tractable computation, the original bi-level structure is reformulated into a single-level nonlinear programming problem through the application of Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) optimality conditions. The resulting model is highly constrained and non-convex. This makes it suitable for solutions using metaheuristic approaches. In this work, the Marine Predators Algorithm (MPA) is adopted due to its superior global search capability and convergence characteristics. Numerical simulations on the IEEE 33-bus and 69-bus test systems confirm the
effectiveness of the proposed approach in reducing both energy losses and operational costs. The results highlight the practical applicability of the MPA-based framework for intelligent DG planning in smart grids under dynamic
pricing environments.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ton Ngoc, T., Minh Le, P., Huu Pham, L. ., & Minh Le, T. . (2025). Bi-Level DG Optimization in Distribution Networks with TOU Pricing and Demand Response Using MPA. ECTI Transactions on Electrical Engineering, Electronics, and Communications, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.37936/ecti-eec.2525233.259805
Section
Electrical Power Systems

References

A. Kumar, R. Verma, N. K. Choudhary, and N. Singh, “‘Optimal Multi-Objective placement and sizing of distributed generation in power distribution system: a comprehensive review,’” Energy Sources, Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 7160–7185, 2023, doi: 10.1080/15567036.2023.2216167.

P. Siano and D. Sarno, “Assessing the benefits of residential demand response in a real time distribution energy market,” Appl. Energy, vol. 161, no. October 2017, pp. 533–551, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.017.

W. L. Theo, J. S. Lim, W. S. Ho, H. Hashim, and C. T. Lee, “Review of distributed generation (DG) system planning and optimisation techniques: Comparison of numerical and mathematical modelling methods,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 67, pp. 531–573, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.063.

N. Carolina, Z. Li, and D. Ph, Market operations in electric power systems: forecasting, scheduling, and risk management, vol. 40, no. 03. New York: IEEE Press & Wiley-Interscience, 2002. doi: 10.5860/choice.40-1574.

T. N. Trieu, N. T. Thuan, T. V. Anh, and V. P. Tu, “Optimal location and operation of battery energy storage system in the distribution system for reducing energy cost in 24-hour period,” Int Trans Electr Energ Syst, vol. e12861, no. February, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.1002/2050-7038.12861.

M. S. Javadi, K. Firuzi, M. Rezanejad, M. Lotfi, M. Gough, and J. P. S. Catalão, “Optimal Sizing and Siting of Electrical Energy Storage Devices for Smart Grids Considering Time-of-Use Programs,” in IEEE, IECON 2019-45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. IEEE, 2019, pp. 4017–4022.

H. Sun, Z. Gao, and J. Wu, “A bi-level programming model and solution algorithm for the location of logistics distribution centers,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 610–616, 2008, doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2007.02.007.

International Energy Agency, “Renewables 2023,” 2023. doi: 10.1002/peng.20026.

H. Xie, X. Teng, Y. Xu, and Y. Wang, “Optimal Energy Storage Sizing for Networked Microgrids Considering Reliability and Resilience,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 86336–86348, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2922994.

A. F. Izmailov and M. V. Solodov, “Karush-Kuhn-Tucker systems: Regularity conditions, error bounds and a class of Newton-type methods,” Math. Program. Ser. B, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 631–650, 2003, doi: 10.1007/s10107-002-0346-6.

A. Faramarzi, M. Heidarinejad, S. Mirjalili, and A. H. Gandomi, “Marine Predators Algorithm: A nature-inspired metaheuristic,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 152, pp. 0–43, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113377.

A. Selim, S. Kamel, A. S. Alghamdi, and F. Jurado, “Optimal Placement of DGs in Distribution System Using an Improved Harris Hawks Optimizer Based on Single- And Multi-Objective Approaches,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 52815–52829, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980245.

D. B. Prakash and C. Lakshminarayana, “Multiple DG placements in radial distribution system for multi objectives using Whale Optimization Algorithm,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2797–2806, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2017.11.003.

A. M. El-Rifaie et al., “Modified Gradient-Based Algorithm for Distributed Generation and Capacitors Integration in Radial Distribution Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, no. October, pp. 120899–120917, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3326758.

J. Zhang, G. Zhang, Y. Huang, and M. Kong, “A Novel Enhanced Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm for Global Optimization,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, no. July, pp. 75040–75062, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3190481.

M. E. Baran and F. F. Wu, “Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 4, no. 2. pp. 1401–1407, 1989. doi: 10.1109/61.25627.

T. N. Trieu, L. M. Phong, and L. M. Tan, “Multi-objective optimization strategy for enhancing distribution power system efficiency with integrated distributed generation,” Univ. Danang - J. Sci. Technol., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 7–10, 2025, doi: 10.31130/ud-jst.2025.016.

T. N. Trieu, P. H. Loc, L. M. Phong, and L. M. Tan, “Multi-Objective Optimization of Electric Distribution Systems With Integrated Distributed Generation Using Deep Reinforcement Learning,” Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 22166–22171, 2025, doi: 10.48084/etasr.10359.