Consumer’s Confidential Level for Evaluating New Innovative System for Safety Consumed Shrimp by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Consumer’s behavior is the main subject that use for predict the purchasing behavior in Marketing strategic management. Safety’s awareness of consumer is the main attribute, especially concern on raw shrimp from conventional production system that creates a lot of problem such as toxic residual from antibiotic, disease. Then food safety’s awareness is related to buying deciding process. Brand new technology has limited to apply for shrimp farming business, aim to find the key attribute to launch the new innovative products. The acceptance of consumers would support adoption process of all parties in this value chain. The research shows the safety is the parameter that’s dominated safety’s awareness, interesting till evaluated stage. The researcher took the structural equation modeling (SEM) to proof hypothesizes and explained the consumer behavior
Article Details
Copyright @2021 Engineering Transactions
Faculty of Engineering and Technology
Mahanakorn University of Technology
References
Berg L, Kjaernes U, Ganskau E, Minina V, Voltchkova L,Halkier B, Holm L. Trust in food safety in Russia, Denmark and Norway. European Societies, 2005; 7(1):103–129.
Berg L. Trust in food in the age of mad cow disease: A comparative study of consumers’ evaluation of food safety in Belgium, Britain and Norway. Appetite, 2004; 42:21–32.
Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. The effects of model parsimony and sampling error on the fit of structural equation models. Conference of the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL, August, 1999.
Chicago, IL: Scientific Software, 1996. . Statistics Netherlands. Statistical Yearbook of the Netherlands 2006. Voorburg, The Netherlands, 2006.
Climate change and food security: a framework document http://www.fao.org/3/k2595e/k2595e00.pdf
Consumer Confidence in the Safety of Food and Newspaper Coverage of Food Safety Issues 141
De Jonge J, Frewer L, Van Trijp H, Renes RJ, De Wit W, Timmers J. Monitoring consumer confidence in food safety: An exploratory study. British Food Journal, 2004; 106:837–849.
De Jonge J, Van Trijp JCM, Van Der Lans IA, Renes RJ, Frewer LJ. A scale for consumer confidence in the safety of food. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Mansholt GraduatemSchool of Social Sciences, Working Paper No. 44, 2008.
Farrell AD. Structural equation modeling with longitudinal data: Strategies for examining group differences and reciprocal relationships. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1994; 62(3):477–487.
Going beyond exposure to local news media: An information-processing examination of public perceptions of food safety. Journal of Health Communication, 2006; 11:789–806.
Grunert KG. Current issues in the understanding of consumer food choice. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2002; 13(8):275–285.
Johnson BB. Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust. Journal of Risk Research, 1999; 2(4):325–354.
Johnson MD, Auh S. Customer satisfaction, loyalty, and the trust environment. Advances in Consumer Research, 1998; 25:15–20.
Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown S, Emel J, Goble R,Kasperson JX, Ratick S. The social amplification of risk: Aconceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 1988; 8(2):177–187.
Klaus G. Grunert 2005 Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand European Review of Agricultural Economics Vol 32 (3) (2005) pp. 369–391 doi:10.1093/eurrag/jbi011
Kramer RM, Tyler TR (eds). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 1996.
Linlin Wang,1,* Chen Hu,2,* and Longquan Shao The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future
Little TD, Slegers DW, Card NA. A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling, 2006; 13(1):59–
Pennings JME, Wansink B, Meulenberg MTG. A note on modeling consumer reactions to a crisis: The case of the mad cow disease. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2002; 19:91–100.
Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Muller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 2003; 8(2):23–74.
Setbon M, Raude J, Fischler C, Flahault A. Risk perception of the “mad cow disease” in France: Determinants and consequences. Risk Analysis, 2005; 25(4):813–826. Fleming K, T horson E, Zhang Y.
Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G. Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 2000; 20(5):713–719.
Siegrist M, Earle TC, Gutscher H. Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF) risks. Risk Analysis, 2003; 23(4):705–716.
Sijtsma K, Van Der Ark LA. Investigation and treatment of missing item scores in test and questionnaire data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2003; 38(4):505–528.
Steenkamp JBEM, Baumgartner H. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 1998; 25:78–90.
Van Kleef E, Frewer LJ, Chryssochoidis G, Houghton JR, Korzen-Bohr S, Krystallis T, Lassen J, Pfenning U, Rowe G. Perceptions of food risk management among key stake-holders: Results from a cross-European study. Appetite, 2006; 47:46–63.