Incentive Framework for Academic Publication Reviewer System
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The contemporary academic publishing ecosystem is impeded by structural constraints in cost management and incentive design. The peer review landscape relies predominantly on voluntary contributions. Reviewer compensation is typically non-transferable across publishers. Additionally, there is a lack of a centralized repository with transparent quality metrics. These inefficiencies lead to inconsistent expert assignment and persistent delays in preprint evaluation. To alleviate the problems that are earlier mentioned. This paper proposes a novel incentive framework designed as a shared infrastructure for academic publishers. We introduce a Reviewer Index (RV-Index) that synthesizes review quality, timeliness, and participation history to establish auditable reviewer tiers. Furthermore, a centralized clearinghouse manages guarantees, transferable benefits, and rewards, while a standardized API facilitates reviewer requests based on tiers and Service Level Agreements (SLAs). Lastly, the validations confirm the framework’s soundness and its potential to enhance the quality and efficiency of the peer review ecosystem.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright @2021 Engineering Transactions: A Research Publication of Mahanakorn University of Technology
Faculty of Engineering and Technology
Mahanakorn University of Technology
References
H. Horta and J. Jung, “The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science,” Higher Education Quarterly, vol. 78, no. 4, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1111/hequ.12511.
E. Merrill and A. Cox, “Reviewer overload and what can we do about it,” 2014, Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/jwmg.763.
M. Samimi and A. Anstey, “At its best, peer review is wonderful to behold,” 2017, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15989.
C. Robba, G. Citerio, and S. Jaber, “Redefining the paradigm: incentivizing the peer review process for scientific advancement,” Aug. 01, 2024, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07504-6.
M. Petrescu and A. S. Krishen, “The evolving crisis of the peer-review process,” Sep. 01, 2022, Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/s41270-022-00176-5.
R. H. Ellaway, “Where have all the reviewers gone?,” Jul. 01, 2024, Springer Science and Business Media B.V. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10350-2.
J. Huisman and J. Smits, “Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective,” Scientometrics, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 633–650, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2310-5.
A. Severin and J. Chataway, “Purposes of peer review: A qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions,” Learned Publishing, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 144–155, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1002/leap.1336.
C. Kadaifci, E. Isikli, and Y. I. Topcu, “Fundamental problems in the peer-review process and stakeholders’ perceptions of potential suggestions for improvement,” Learned Publishing, vol. 38, no. 1, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1002/leap.1637.
D. Nicholas et al., “Early Career Researchers on all Aspects of Peer Review: A Deep Dive Into the Data,” Learned Publishing, vol. 38, no. 2, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1002/leap.2002.
F. Downer et al., “Academic Integrity in Crisis: A Systematic Analysis of Questionable Research Practices,” in 2025 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, SIEDS 2025, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2025, pp. 13–18. doi: 10.1109/SIEDS65500.2025.11021201.
O. H. Azar et al., “The Academic Review Process: How Can We Make it More Efficient?”
A. Y. Gasparyan, A. N. Gerasimov, A. A. Voronov, and G. D. Kitas, “Rewarding peer reviewers - maintaining the integrity of science communication,” J. Korean Med. Sci., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 360–364, 2015, doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.4.360.
M. A. Zaharie and M. Seeber, “Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment,” Scientometrics, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 1587–1609, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2912-6.
S. Lauer and U. Wilkesmann, “Determinants of Peer Review Acceptance: Motivational Insights From German Academia,” Higher Education Quarterly, vol. 79, no. 1, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1111/hequ.12575.
J. A. García, R. Rodriguez-Sánchez, and J. Fdez-Valdivia, “Can a paid model for peer review be sustainable when the author can decide whether to pay or not?,” Scientometrics, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 1491–1514, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-04248-8.
V. Barbour, “Perverse incentives and perverse publishing practices,” Sci. Bull. (Beijing)., vol. 60, no. 14, pp. 1225–1226, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11434-015-0846-4.
A. Ressi, “Discussion of ‘The Market for Reviews: Strategic Behavior of Online Product Reviewers with Monetary Incentives,’” Schmalenbach Business Review, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 437–445, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s41464-020-00097-9.
S. Righi and K. Takács, “The miracle of peer review and development in science: an agent-based model,” Scientometrics, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 587–607, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2244-y.
M. Radzvilas, F. De Pretis, W. Peden, D. Tortoli, and B. Osimani, “Incentives for Research Effort: An Evolutionary Model of Publication Markets with Double-Blind and Open Review,” Comput. Econ., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1433–1476, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10614-022-10250-w.
Y. Xiao, F. Dorfler, and M. Van Der Schaar, “Incentive Design in Peer Review: Rating and Repeated Endogenous Matching,” Oct. 01, 2019, IEEE Computer Society. doi: 10.1109/TNSE.2018.2877578.
W. Kaltenbrunner, “Between Gift-Giving and Accumulation: Peer Review Economies in Psychology,” Minerva, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11024-025-09582-2.
F. Jabeen, Z. Hamid, A. Akhunzada, W. Abdul, and S. Ghouzali, “Trust and Reputation Management in Healthcare Systems: Taxonomy, Requirements and Open Issues,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 17246–17263, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2810337.
A. Kawbunjun, U. Thongsatapornwatana, and W. Lilakiatsakun, “Framework of marketing or newsletter sender reputation system (FMNSRS),” in Proceedings - International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, AINA, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Apr. 2015, pp. 420–427. doi: 10.1109/AINA.2015.216.
A. Kawbunjun, U. Thongsatapornwatana, and W. Lilakiatsakun, “Marketing or Newsletter Sender Reputation System Using Association Analysis Concept,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, IEEE, Oct. 2015, pp. 262–269. doi: 10.1109/CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM.2015.38.
A. Kawbunjun, W. Lilakiatsakun, and U. Thongsatapornwatana, “Advertising Email Management Using Multi-Level Reputation System,” in 2018 IEEE/ACIS 17th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), IEEE, Jun. 2018, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/ICIS.2018.8466418.
A. Benlahbib and E. H. Nfaoui, “Aggregating customer review attributes for online reputation generation,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 96550–96564, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2996805.
S. Mahmood, A. Ghani, A. Daud, R. Alharbey, A. Bukhari, and B. Alshemaimri, “Expert Ranking of Employees in Large Enterprises Using Tacit Reputation,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 178309–178319, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3506819.
R. Cedazo, E. Gonzalez, M. Serra-Ricart, and A. Brunete, “Improving the results of citizen science projects through reputation systems: The case of wolf’s number experiment,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 186026–186038, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3030006.
Y. Dong, S. Sun, C. Xia, and M. Perc, “Second-Order Reputation Promotes Cooperation in the Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Game,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 82532–82540, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2922200.
K. Mrabet, F. El Bouanani, and H. Ben-Azza, “Generalized Secure and Dynamic Decentralized Reputation System With a Dishonest Majority,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 9368–9388, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3239394.
E. Troncoso, F. Ganga-Contreras, and M. Briceño, “Incentive Policies for Scientific Publications in the State Universities of Chile,” 2022, doi: 10.3390/publications.
