Coconut and to a lesser extent krabok oil, depress rumen protozoa in beef cows

Main Article Content

Paiwan Panyakaew

Abstract

Krabok and coconut oil were assessed for their ability to affect rumen protozoa via a 3×3 Latin square design experiment with three rumen cannulated beef cows. The diets consisted of a concentrate supplemented with either 25.5 g/kg of tallow (control) or the same quantity of coconut oil or krabok oil. The animals were fed at 1.5% of their body weight per d for 28 d per period. The samples of rumen fluid were collected on day 23 and 27 of each period, 3, 6, 9 and 12h after morning feeding. Rumen protozoa numbers, as well as amylolytic, cellulolytic and proteolytic bacteria were counted microscopically. Fragments of the 18S rRNA gene were amplified in a nested PCR using general eukaryotic and ciliate protozoa-specific primers (Euk1a and 539r followed by 316f- Euk516r-GC). Diversity of the ciliate community was analyzed by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) (7% acrylamide, 35-50% gradient; 38 V for 16h at 60 ºC) and gels were processed with BioNumeric software. Protozoa numbers decreased by 0.33 log units in the coconut (P<0.05) and 0.21 log units in the krabok oil diet (P<0.05) compared with the control diet. The ciliate value was not significantly different between treatment but were strongly (R2=0.88) linearly associated with protozoa counts. The concentration of total VFA was not affected (P=0.804) by the diet. Except propionic acid which showed a trend (P=0.056), the proportions of the remaining VFA were not significantly (P>0.10) different between treatments. The propionate proportion was only reduced by supplementation of coconut oil to the TMR. Neither oils affected amylolytic, cellulolytic or proteolytic bacteria counts. Cluster analysis of the DGGE profile showed two clusters of ciliate communities, one including all the T diet-fed animals. All except one DGGE profile of a cow fed the KO diet group into the second cluster. Coconut oil, and to a lesser extent krabok oil, has a marked effect on the numbers of rumen protozoa.

Article Details

How to Cite
Panyakaew, P. (2020). Coconut and to a lesser extent krabok oil, depress rumen protozoa in beef cows. Journal of Science and Agricultural Technology, 1(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.14456/jsat.2020.4
Section
Research Article

References

Asanuma, N., Iwamoto, M., and Hino, T. 1999. Effect of the addition of fumarate on methane production by ruminal microorganisms i n vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 780-787. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75296-3.

Boeckaert, C., Fievez, V., Vanhecke, D., Verstraete, W., and Boon, N. 2007. Changes in rumen biohydrogenation intermediates and ciliate protozoa diversity after algae supplementation to dairy cattle. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 109, 767-777. DOI:10.1002/ejlt.200700052.

Boeckaert, C., Jouany, J.P., Lassalas, B., Morgavi, D.P., Vlaeminck, B., Boon, N., and Fievez, V. 2008. The rumen protozoon Isotricha prostoma and its associated bacteria play no major role in the biohydrogenation of linoleic acid. In Gut microbiome: Functionality, Interaction with thehost and Impact on the Environment. 6th INRA-RRI symposium, Clermont-Ferrand, France, p. 44. DOI:10.1017/S1751731109004285

Boon, N., Top, E.M., Verstraete, W., and Siciliano, S.D. 2003. Bioaugmentation as a tool to protect the structure and function of an activated-sludge microbial community against a 3-chloroaniline shock load. Appl. Environm. Microbiol. 69, 1511-1520. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1511-1520.2003

Dohme, F., Machmüller, A., Estermann, B.L., Pfister, P., Wasserfallen, A., and Kreuzer, M., 1999. The role of the rumen ciliate protozoa for methane suppression caused by coconut oil. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 29, 187-192. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00614.x

Dohme, F., Machmüller, A., Wasserfallen, A., and Kreuzer, M. 2001. Ruminal methanogenesis as influenced by individual fatty acids supplemented to complete ruminant diets. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 32, 47-51. DOI: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2001.00863.x

Finlay, B.J., Esteban, G., Clarke, K.J., Williams, A.G., Embley, T.M., and hirt, R.P. 1994. Some rumen ciliateshave endosymbiotic methanogens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 117, 157-162. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06758.x

Galyean, M., 1989. Laboratory Procedure in Animal Nutrition Research. 1st edn., Department of Animal and Life Science, New Mexico States University, USA., pp. 162-167.

Goel, G., Arvidsson, K., Vlaeminck, B., Bruggeman, G., Deschepper, K., and Fievez, V. 2009. Effects of capric acid on rumen methanogenesis and biohydrogenation of linoleic and alpha-linolenic acid. Animal 3, 810-816. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731109004352.

Guyader, J., Eugene, M., Noziere, P., Morgavi, D.P., Doreau, M., and Martin, C. 2014. Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach. Animal 8, 1816-1825. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114001852

Hobson, P.N. 1969. Rumen bacteria. In Methods in Microbiology, Vol. 3B, eds. J.R. Norris and D.W. Ribbons. Academic Press, London, pp.133-149.DOI :10.1007/BF01576265.

Hook, S.E., Wright, A.D.G., and Mcbride, B.W. 2010. Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies. Archaea, 11p. DOI: 10.1155/2010/945785.

Hungate, R.E., 1969. A roll tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes. Meth. Microbiol. 3, 117-132. DOI: 10.1038/d42859-019-00007-1.

Jordan, E., Lovett, D.K., Monahan, F.J., Callan, J., Flynn, B., and O’Mara, F.P. 2006. Effect of refined coconut oil or copra meal on methane output and on intake and performance of beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 84, 162-170. DOI: 10.2527/2006.841162x

Kreuzer, M. 1986. Methodik und anwendung der defaunierung beim wachsenden wiederkäuer. J. Vet. Med. 33A, 721-745. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1986.tb00586.x

Lila, Z.A., Mohammed, N., Ksanda, S., Kamada, T., and Itabashi, H. 2003. Effect of sarsaponin on ruminal fermentation with particular reference to methane production in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 3330-3336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73935-6

Machmüller, A., and Kreuzer, M. 1999. Methane suppression by coconut oil and associated effects on nutrient and energy balance in sheep. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 79, 65-72.https://doi.org/10.4141/A98-079

Machmüller, A., Soliva, C.R., and Kreuzer, M. 2003. Effect of coconut oil and defaunation treatment on methanogenesis in sheep. Reprod. Nutr. Develop. 43(1), 41-55. Machmüller, A. 2006. Medium-chain fatty acids and their potential to reduce methanogenesis in domestic ruminants. Agricul. Ecosys. Environm. 112, 107-114.

Panyakaew, P., Goel, G., Lourengo, M., Yuangklang, C., and Fievez, V. 2013a. Medium-chain fatty acids from coconut or krabok oil inhibit in vitro rumen methanogenesis and conversion of non-conjugated dienoic biohydrogenation intermediates. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 180, 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.12.005.

Panyakaew, P., Goel, G., Yuangklang, C., Boon, N., Schonewille, J. Th.,hendriks, W.H., and Fievez, V. 2013b. Effect of supplementing coconut or krabok oil, rich in medium chain fatty acids on ruminal fermentation, protozoa and archaeal population of bulls. Animal, 1950-1958. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113001766.

Van Ranst, G., Fievez, V., Vandewalle, M., Van Waes, C., De Riek, J., and Van Bockstaele, E. 2010. Influence of damaging and wilting red clover on lipid metabolism during ensiling and in vitro rumen incubation. Anim. Sci. 4, 1528-1540. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731110000625.

Soliva, C.R., Hindrichsen, I.K., Meile, L., Kreuzer, M., and Machmüller, A. 2003. Effects of mixtures of lauric and myristic acid on rumen methanogens and methanogenesis in vitro. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 37, 35-39. DOI: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2003.01343.x

Wongsuthavas, S., Yuangklang, C., Wittayakun, S., Vasupen, K., Mitchaothai, J., Srenanul, P., and Beynen, A.C. 2007. Dietary soybean oil, but not krabok oil, diminishes abdominal fat deposition in broiler chickens. Poultry Sci. 6, 792-795. DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2007.792.795.

Yu, Z., and Morrison, M. 2004. Comparisons of Different Hypervariable Regions of rrs Genes for Use in Fingerprinting of Microbial Communities by PCR-Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 7, 4800-4806. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4800–4806.2004