Multi-Objective Generation Maintenance Scheduling Using Global Criterion and Lexicographic Methods
Keywords:
Coefficient search space, Global criteria method, Generation maintenance scheduling, Generation maintenance cost, Lexicographic method, System reliabilityAbstract
Generation maintenance scheduling (GMS) is a power system maintenance model that allows system equipment to provide electricity continuously, while also improving system reliability (SR). However, turning off a distributed generator (DG) for maintenance prevents it from generating power for sale. As a result, revenue that a generation company (GenCo) might potentially receive is decreased. Therefore, reliability and cost outcomes should be considered when planning maintenance. Several studies recommend the GMS model, based on multi-objective problems solved through optimization methods. The global criterion and lexicographic methods, by contrast, are two mathematical approaches individually applied in distinct network topologies, objectives, and constraints. In addition, the coefficient search space, specified as a single constant, is also used in the lexicographic method. This paper uses the GMS model with global criteria and lexicographic methods in the same systems to assess efficiency of multi-objective problem solutions based on cost and system reliability for both methods. Coefficient search space is adjusted for the lexicographic method, depending on the first objective. Based on the IEEE 6 and IEEE 18-bus test networks, a numerical example is investigated. Results indicate that the two methods provide distinct GMS plans for a GenCo to select. If the GMS problem is based on a few objectives, DGs, or loads, the global criterion is preferable to the lexicographic method for mathematical findings. The main objective of coefficient search space settings for the lexicographic method should be adjusted to obtain results close to the main objective.
References
Endrenyi J, Aboresheid S, Allan RN, Anders GJ, Billinton R, Chowdhury N, Dialynas EN. The present status of maintenance strategies and the impact of maintenance on reliability. IEEE Trans. Power Syst 2001;16:638-46.
Endrenyi J, Ander GJ, Leite da Silva AM. Probabilistic evaluation of the effect of maintenance on reliability. An application to power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst 1998;13:576-83.
Balaji G, Balamurugan R, Lakshminarasimman L. Mathematical approach assisted differential evolution for generator maintenance scheduling. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst 2016;82: 508-18.
Wang Y, Li Z, Shahidehpour M, Wu L, Guo CX, Zhu B. Stochastic co-optimization of midterm and short-term maintenance outage scheduling considering covariates in power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst 2016;31:4795-805.
Ekpenyong UE, Zhang J, Xia X. An improved robust model for generator maintenance scheduling. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2012;92:29-36.
Schlünz EB, J.H. van Vuuren. An investigation into the effectiveness of simulated annealing as a solution approach for the generator maintenance scheduling problem. Int j. electr. power energy syst. 2013;53:166-74.
Sadeghian O, Oshnoei A, Nikkhanh S, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B. Multi‐objective optimisation of generation maintenance scheduling in restructured power systems based on global criterion method. IET Smart Grid 2019;2:203-13.
Eygelaar J, J.H. van Vuuren, D.P. Lötter. Generator maintenance scheduling based on the risk of power generating unit failure. Int j. electr. power energy syst 2018;95:83-95.
Kumarappan N, Suresh K. Combined SA PSO method for transmission constrained maintenance scheduling using levelized risk method. Int j. electr. power energy syst 2015;73:1025-34.
Salvador Perez-Canto, Juan Carlos Rubio-Romero. A model for the preventive maintenance scheduling of power plants
including wind farms. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf 2013;119:67-75.
Wang Y, Krischen SD, Zhong H, Xia Q, Kang C. Coordination of Generation Maintenance Scheduling in Electricity Markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst 2016;31:4565-74.
Mollahassani-Pour M, Rashidinejad M, Pourakbari-Kasmaei M. An Environmentally-Constrained Reliability-Based Generation Maintenance Scheduling Considering Demand-Side Management. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib 2018;13:1153-39.
Muniz Moro L, Ramos A. Goal programming approach to maintenance scheduling of generating units in large scale power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst 1999;14: 1021-8.
Subramanian S, Abirami M, Ganesan S. Reliable/cost-effective maintenance schedules for a composite power system using fuzzy supported teaching learning algorithm. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib 2015;9:805-19.
Parhizkar T, Mosleh A, Roshandel R. Aging based optimal scheduling framework for power plants using equivalent operating hour approach. Appl. Energy 2017;205:1345-63.
Pandzic H, Conejo AJ, Kuzle I. An EPEC approach to the yearly maintenance scheduling of generating units. IEEE Trans. Power Syst 2013;28:922-30.
Feng C, Wang X, Li F. Optimal maintenance scheduling of power producers considering unexpected unit failure. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib 2009;3:460-71.
Moghbeli M, Sharifi V, Abdollahi A, Rashidinejad M. Evaluating the impact of energy efficiency programs on generation maintenance scheduling. Int j. electr. power energy syst 2020;119.
Manuel S, Alvarez-Alvarado, Dilan Jayaweera. Reliability-based smart-maintenance model for power system generators. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib 2020;14:1770-80.
Bahareh Bagheri, Nima Amjady. Adaptive-robust multi-resolution generation maintenance scheduling with probabilistic reliability constraint. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib 2019;13:3292-301.
Lou X, Feng C, Chen W, Gou C. Risk-Based Coordination of Maintenance Scheduling and Unit Commitment in Power Systems. IEEE Access 2020;8: 58788-99.
Wang Y, Kirschen DS, Zhong H, Xia Q, Kang C. Coordination of generation maintenance scheduling in electricity markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst 2016;31:4565-74.
Lindner BG, Brits R, J.H. van Vuuren, Bekker J. Tradeoffs between levelling the reserve margin and minimising production cost in generator maintenance scheduling for regulated power systems. Int j. electr. power energy syst 2018;101:458-71.
Moradkhani A, Haghifam MR, Abedi SM. Risk-based maintenance scheduling in the presence of reward penalty scheme. Electr. Power Syst. Res 2015;121:126-36.
Bagheri B, Amjady N, Dehghan S. Multiscale Multiresolution Generation Maintenance Scheduling: A Stochastic Affinely Adjustable Robust Approach. IEEE Syst J 2020;15:893-904.
Duarte YS, Szpytko J, Alfredo M. del Castillo Serpa. Monte Carlo simulation model to coordinate the preventive maintenance scheduling of generating units in isolated distributed Power Systems. Electr. Power Syst. Res 2020;182.
Prukpanit P, Keawprapha P, Leeprechanon N. Optimal generation maintenance scheduling considering financial return and unexpected failure of distributed generation. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib 2021;15: 1787-97.
Prukpanit P, Keawprapha P, Leeprechanon N. Optimizing Generation Maintenance Scheduling Considering Emission Factors, MDPI 2023;16:7775.
Sadeghian O, Shotorbani AM, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B. Generation maintenance scheduling in virtual power plants. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib 2019;13:2584-96.
Conejo AJ, Garcia-Bertrand R, Diaz-Salazar M. Generation maintenance scheduling in restructured power systems. 2005;20:984-92.
Marler RT, Arora JS. Survey of Multi-Objective Optimization Methods for Engineering. Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim 2004;26:369-95.
Stanimirović I. Compendious lexicographic method for multi-objective optimization. Ser.Math. Inf 2012;27:55-66
Kuang-Hua Chang. Design Theory and Methods Using CAD/CAE (the Computer Aided Engineering Design Series). 1st ed. Academic Press; 2014
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Science & Technology Asia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
