Assessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy and Readiness in Thailand’s Workforce: Challenges and Opportunities for Digital Transformation

Main Article Content

Vachirawit Kaewsawad
Jerzy Duda

Abstract

As this paper seeks to examine how Thailand’s workforce readiness for AI technologies can be influenced by AI literacy, anxiety, and acceptance factors, the researcher has conducted an online survey of 318 respondents across multiple Thai industries as well as employing the Structural Equation Modeling or SEM to analyze the relationship between these factors. The modified Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework has also been implemented and revealed that AI literacy can significantly reduce anxiety (𝛽 = -0.892, 𝑝 < 0.001) while the effort expectancy strongly influences the AI acceptance (𝛽 = 0.370, 𝑝 < 0.001). This suggests that there is a psychological barrier that should be addressed alongside technical skills improvement. The study has also found that AI literacy can positively influence performance expectancy (𝛽 = 0.262, 𝑝 < 0.001) and effort expectancy (𝛽 = 0.327, 𝑝 < 0.001) which enhances AI’s perceived usefulness and ease of use. The author’s model validates ten of the fourteen hypotheses, confirming that the facilitating conditions can significantly impact AI’s acceptance while social influences show positive yet non-significant effects. These findings altogether provided actionable insights for policymakers and organizations to develop and adopt the targeted interventions that can enhance both AI competency and a more optimistic environment towards integration of AI technologies in Thailand’s workforce.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kaewsawad, V. ., & Duda, . J. . (2025). Assessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy and Readiness in Thailand’s Workforce: Challenges and Opportunities for Digital Transformation. Science & Technology Asia, 30(3), 209–231. retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SciTechAsia/article/view/256785
Section
Engineering

References

Babashahi L, Barbosa CE, Lima Y, Lyra A, Salazar H, Argôlo M, et al. AI in the workplace: A systematic review of skill transformation in the industry. Adm Sci. 2024;14(6):127.

Hradecky D, Kennell J, Cai W, Davidson R. Organizational readiness to adopt artificial intelligence in the exhibition sector in Western Europe. Int J Inf Manag. 2022;65:102497.

Li H, Kim S. Developing AI literacy in HRD: Competencies, approaches, and implications. Hum Resour Dev Int. 2024;27(3):345–66.

de Andrés-Sánchez J, Gené-Albesa J. Explaining policyholders’ chatbot acceptance with an unified technology acceptance and use of technology-based model. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res. 2023;18(3):1217–37.

Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–478.

Schiavo G, Businaro S, Zancanaro M. Comprehension, apprehension, and acceptance: Understanding the influence of literacy and anxiety on acceptance of artificial intelligence. Technol Soc. 2024;77:102537.

Chetty K. AI literacy for an ageing workforce: Leveraging the experience of older workers. OBM Geriatr. 2023;7(3):1–17.

Dingel J, Kleine AK, Cecil J, Sigl AL, Lermer E, Gaube S. Predictors of health care practitioners’ intention to use AI enabled clinical decision support systems: Meta-analysis based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26(1):e57224.

Thailand national AI strategy annual report 2023. [cited 2024 Nov 30]. Available from: https://ai.in.th/wpcontent/uploads/2024/06/AI-ThailandAnnual-Report-2023.pdf

National Science and Technology Development Agency. Thailand national AI strategy and action plan (2022–2027). [cited 2024 Nov 30]. Available from: https://ai.in.th/wpcontent/uploads/2022/12/2022-NAISPresentation-eng.pdf

Jang M. AI literacy and intention to use text-based GenAI for learning: The case of business students in Korea. Informatics. 2024;11(3):54.

Özçevik Subaşi D, Akça Sümengen A, Semerci R, Şimşek E, Çakır GN, Temizsoy E. Paediatric nurses’ perspectives on artificial intelligence applications: A cross-sectional study of concerns, literacy levels and attitudes. J Adv Nurs. 2024.

Alkhalifah JM, Bedaiwi AM, Shaikh N, Seddiq W, Meo SA. Existential anxiety about artificial intelligence (AI) – is it the end of humanity era or a new chapter in the human revolution: Questionnaire based observational study. Front Psychiatry. 2024;15:1368122.

Allahham M, Ahmad AYB. AI-induced anxiety in the assessment of factors influencing the adoption of mobile payment services in supply chain firms: A mental accounting perspective. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2024;8(1):505–14.

Chaudhry IS, Paquibut RY, Chabchoub H. Factors influencing employees trust in AI & its adoption at work: Evidence from United Arab Emirates. 2022 Int Arab Conf Inf Technol (ACIT). 2022:1–7.

Falebita OS. Assessing the relationship between anxiety and the adoption of artificial intelligence tools among mathematics preservice teachers. Interdiscip J Educ Res. 2024;6:1–13.

Wang Y, Wang Y. Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: An initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior. Interact Learn Environ. 2019;30:619–34.

Tanantong T, Wongras P. A UTAUT based framework for analyzing users’ in tention to adopt artificial intelligence in human resource recruitment: a case study of Thailand. Syst. 2024;12(1):28.