An Investigation of Project Management Factors for Carbon Dioxide Reduction in Railway Infrastructure Projects

Authors

  • Kanyarat Khemnak Student, Master of Engineering Program in Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University
  • Preenithi Aksorn Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University

Keywords:

Project management, Carbon dioxide reduction, Railway infrastructure projects

Abstract

The rapid expansion of railway infrastructure construction projects in Thailand plays a crucial role in supporting sustainable national development. However, the construction phase is recognized as a major contributor to carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. This study aims to investigate and analyze project management factors that contribute to CO2 emission reduction in railway infrastructure construction projects in Thailand. A quantitative research approach was employed. Based on an extensive literature review, 27 project management variables were identified and incorporated into a five-point Likert scale questionnaire. Data were collected from 407 practitioners involved in railway infrastructure construction projects and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). The results reveal that the extracted factors explain a total variance of 70.538% and can be classified into four principal components: (1) Project Planning and Management Approaches, (2) Site and Resource Management, (3) Personnel and Stakeholder Readiness, and (4) Standards and Operational Control. The findings indicate that strategic planning, managerial support, stakeholder cooperation, and systematic operational control play a significant role in reducing CO2 emissions during the construction phase. This study provides practical and policy-relevant insights for enhancing project management practices in railway infrastructure construction, thereby supporting sustainable carbon emission reduction and long-term infrastructure sustainability in Thailand.

References

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021.

National Economic and Social Development Council. Master plan under the National Strategy (2018-2037) (revised edition) [summary] [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Dec 20]. Available from: https://www.nesdc.go.th/nscr/main/

International Union of Railways. Carbon footprint of railway infrastructure: Comparing existing methodologies on typical corridors – recommendations for harmonized approach. Paris: International Union of Railways; 2016.

Huang L, Krigsvoll G, Johansen F, Liu Y, Zhang X. Carbon emission of global construction sector. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;81:1906-16.

Akbarnezhad A, Xiao J. Estimation and minimization of embodied carbon of buildings: A review. Buildings. 2017;7(1):5.

Hwang BG, Ng WJ. Project management knowledge and skills for green construction: Overcoming challenges. Int J Proj Manag. 2013;31(2):272-84.

Kaewunruen S, Sussman JM, Einstein HH. Strategic framework to achieve carbon-efficient construction and maintenance of railway infrastructure systems. Front Environ Sci. 2015;3:6.

Yamane T. Statistics: An introductory analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row; 1973.

Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932;22(140):1-55.

Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563-75.

Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53-5.

Wanitbancha K. Structural equation modeling (SEM) with AMOS. 4th ed. Bangkok: Samlada Limited Partnership; 2019.

Allison PD. Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press; 1999.

Barrett P. Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;42(5):815-24.

Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2003.

Tang JR, Zhang BY, Wu LJ. Path analysis on the influence factors of construction carbon emissions and policy implications for Jiangsu in China. Adv Mater Res. 2012;524-527:2595-601.

Li S, Wu Q, Zheng Y, Sun Q. Study on the spatial association and influencing factors of carbon emissions from the Chinese construction industry. Sustainability. 2021;13(4):1728.

Karlsson I, Rootzén J, Johnsson F. Reaching net-zero carbon emissions in construction supply chains: Analysis of a Swedish road construction project. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2020;120:109651.

Seo MS, Kim T, Hong G, Kim H. On-site measurements of CO2 emissions during the construction phase of a building complex. Energies. 2016;9(8):599.

Wang X, Duan Z, Wu L, Yang D. Estimation of carbon dioxide emission in highway construction: A case study in southwest region of China. J Clean Prod. 2015;103:705-14.

Kaewunruen S, Sresakoolchai J, Yu S. Global warming potentials due to railway tunnel construction and maintenance. Appl Sci. 2020;10(18):6459.

Ortega A, Blainey S, Preston J. Assessing whole-life carbon footprint of under sleeper pad installation for ballasted track. J Transp Eng Part A Syst. 2018;144(12):04018073.

Cho SH, Chae CU. A study on life cycle CO2 emissions of low-carbon building in South Korea. Sustainability. 2016;8(6):579.

Zhang Z, Wang B. Research on the life-cycle CO2 emission of China's construction sector. Energy Build. 2016;112:244-55.

Tirth V, Algarni S, Agarwal N, Saxena A. Greenhouse gas emissions due to the construction of residential buildings in Moradabad, India. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2019;17(5):12111-26.

Lin J, Li H, Huang W, Xu W, Cheng S. A carbon footprint of high-speed railways in China: A case study of the Beijing-Shanghai line. J Ind Ecol. 2019;23(4):869-78.

Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall; 2010.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-28

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย