การวิเคราะห์ปัจจัยในการผลิตสื่อการสอนทางการแพทย์จากการพิมพ์แบบเพิ่มขึ้นด้วยกระบวนการลำดับชั้นเชิงวิเคราะห์
คำสำคัญ:
กระบวนการลำดับชั้นเชิงวิเคราะห์, สื่อการสอน, การพิมพ์แบบ 3 มิติบทคัดย่อ
This research aims to analyze criteria for healthcare educational media from using the 3D printing technology. Healthcare model is fabricated using Envisiontec ULTRA 3SP printer. The 3D printed model is then compared with gross anatomy and textbook. Four key criteria inclusive of education factor, cost factor, appearance factor, and realism factor, are then analyzed using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. Analyzed results show that 3D printed healthcare model is most outstanding in terms of appearance factor. On the other hand, gross anatomy is superior in the education and realism factors, whereas textbook is outstanding with regard to cost factor. The overall analysis suggests that 3D printing technology is a suitable alternative as an educational media for medical students. It is recommended that 3D printed model can be used together with gross anatomy and textbook
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B. Additive manufacturing technologies. New York: Springer; 2014.
Gardan J. Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends. International Journal of Production Research. 2016 May 18;54(10):3118-3132.
Campbell I, Diegel O, Kowen J, Wohlers T. Wohlers report 2018: 3D printing and additive manufacturing state of the industry: annual worldwide progress report. Wohlers Associates; 2018.
Khamhong P, Yingviwatanapong C, Ransikarbum K. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-based criteria analysis for 3d printer selection in additive manufacturing. In 2019 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C) 2019 Dec 11, 1-5.
Ransikarbum K.Multi-criteria decision analysis-based orientation selection problem for integrated 3D printing and subtractive manufacturing. The Journal of Industrial Technology. 2020;16:15-30. Thai.
ASTM Committee F42 on Additive Manufacturing Technologies, ASTM Committee F42 on Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Subcommittee F42. 91 on Terminology. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies. Astm International; 2012.
Budsapab J, Krongyuti F, Suebauan K, Ransikarbum K. Appropriate production analysis from traditional and three-dimensional production with multi-criteria decision making tools. IE Network Conference, 2018 July 23-26, Ubon Ratchathani, 317-322, 2018. Thai.
Wisedla K, Chantakot W, Wattanasang N, Ransikarbum K. Research and development trends in 3d printing technology in Thailand. IE Network Conference, 2018 July 23-26, Ubon Ratchathani, 1635-1639, 2018. Thai.
Ransikarbum K, Thongklom T, Wisedla K, Rakngam P, Somnuek S, Srisopa J. The study of efficiency and feasibility of prosthetic production with 3d printing technology. The 7th Congress of the College of Medicine and Public Health, 2018 August 31, Ubon Ratchathani, 110-116, 2018. Thai.
Ransikarbum K, Ha S, Ma J, Kim N. Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Production Planning of the Build Chamber Utilization in Fused Deposition Modeling. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2017;43:35-46.
Ransikarbum K, Kim N. Data envelopment analysis-based multi-criteria decision making for part orientation selection in fused deposition modeling. In 2017 4th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA) 2017 Apr 21, 81-85.
Ransikarbum K, Kim N. Multi-criteria selection problem of part orientation in 3D fused deposition modeling based on analytic hierarchy process model: A case study. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) 2017 Dec 10, 1455-1459.
Ford S, Minshall T. Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education.
Ransikabum K, Yingviwatanapong C, Leksomboon R, Wajanavisit T, Bijaphala N. Additive Manufacturing-based Healthcare 3D Model for Education: Literature Review and A Feasibility Study. In 2019 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C) 2019 Dec 11, 1-6.
Mimics Available https://www.materialise.com/ [2019, 5, January].
Jiang M, Chen G, Coles‐Black J, Chuen J, Hardidge A. Three‐dimensional printing in orthopaedic preoperative planning improves intraoperative metrics: a systematic review. ANZ journal of surgery. 2019 Nov 7.
Hong D, Lee S, Kim T, Baek JH, Kim WW, Chung KW, Kim N, Sung TY. Usefulness of a 3D-printed thyroid cancer phantom for clinician to patient communication. World Journal of Surgery. 2020 Mar;44(3):788-794.
Suksri S, Ransikarbum K, Sinthuchao S. Analytic hierarchy process technique for selecting the location of the infectious waste incinerator of the community hospital in Surin province. IE Network Conference, 2018 July 23-26, Ubon Ratchathani, 48, 2018. Thai.
Saaty TL. Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. RACSAM-Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales. Serie A. Matematicas. 2008 Sep 1;102(2):251-318.
Ishizaka A, Labib A. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert systems with applications. 2011 Oct 1;38(11):14336-14345.
Vaidya OS, Kumar S. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of operational research. 2006 Feb 16;169(1):1-29.
Velasquez M, Hester PT. An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. International journal of operations research. 2013 May;10(2):56-66.
