Main Article Content
This paper presents the confidence intervals for the effect size base on bootstrap resampling method. The metaanalytic confidence interval for effect size is proposed that are easy to compute. A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to compare the performance of the proposed confidence intervals with the existing confidence intervals. The best confidence interval method will have a coverage probability close to 0.95. Simulation results have shown that our proposed confidence intervals perform well in terms of coverage probability and expected length.
 L. V. Hedges, “Fixed and random effects models in meta-analysis,” Psychological Methods, vol. 3, pp. 486–504, 1998.
 C. F. Bond, W. L. Wiitala, and F. D. Richard, “Meta-analysis of raw mean differences,” Psychological Methods, vol. 8, pp. 406–418, 2003.
 D. G. Bonett, “Confidence intervals for standardized linear contrasts of means,” Psychological Methods, vol. 13, pp. 99–109, 2008.
 D. G. Bonett, “Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences,” Psychological Methods, vol. 14, pp. 225–238, 2009.
 B. Efron and R. Tibshirani, “Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals and other measure of statistical accuracy,” Statistical Science, vol. 1, pp. 54–57, 1986.
 J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1988.