A Comparative Study of Characteristic Finite Element and Characteristic Finite Volume Methods for Convection-Diffusion-Reaction Problems on Triangular Grids

Main Article Content

Sutthisak Phongthanapanich
Robert Eymard

Abstract

The paper aims to compare the accuracy and robustness of the characteristic finite element method (CFEM) and characteristic finite volume method (CFVM) for solving convection-diffusion-reaction problems on two-dimensional triangular grids. The tests are performed on a square unit domain, to which an advective field is imposed in a domain. The results show that the CFEM gives less accurate solution than CFVM for the rotation of a slotted-cylinder and rotation of Gaussian cone problems. Moreover, CFEM gives oscillate solution while the CFVM provides an oscillation-free solution for the skew flow to the grid problem.

Article Details

How to Cite
Phongthanapanich, S., & Eymard, R. (2019). A Comparative Study of Characteristic Finite Element and Characteristic Finite Volume Methods for Convection-Diffusion-Reaction Problems on Triangular Grids. Applied Science and Engineering Progress, 12(4), 235–242. Retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ijast/article/view/232518
Section
Research Articles

References

[1] A. N. Brooks and T. J. R. Hughes, “Streamline upwind Petrov-Galerkin formulation for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 32, pp. 199–259, 1982.

[2] R. Codina, “A discontinuity-capturing crosswind dissipation for the finite element solution of the convection-diffusion equation,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 110, pp. 325–342, 1993.

[3] O. C. Zienkiewicz and R. Codina, “A general algorithm for compressible and incompressible flow - part I. the split, characteristic based scheme,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 20, pp. 869–885, 1995.

[4] R. Codina, “Comparison of some finite element methods for solving the diffusion-convectionreaction equation,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol.156, no. 1–4, pp. 185–210, 1998.

[5] S. Phongthanapanich and P. Dechaumphai, “A characteristic-based finite volume element method for convection-diffusion-reaction equation,” Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, vol. 32, pp. 549–560, 2008.

[6] S. Phongthanapanich and P. Dechaumphai, “Explicit characteristic finite volume method for convectiondiffusion equation on rectangular grids,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, vol. 34, pp. 239–252, 2011.

[7] S. Phongthanapanich and P. Dechaumphai, “An explicit characteristic finite volume element method for non-divergence free convectiondiffusion- reaction equation,” International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics, vol. 4, pp. 179–192, 2012.

[8] Finite Volume Methods, Elsevier Science, North Holland, Netherlands, 2000, pp. 715–1022.

[9] J. Chessa and T. Belytschko, “An extended finite element method for two-phase fluids,” Transaction of ASME, vol. 70, pp. 10–17, 2003.

[10] S. T. Zalesak, “Fully multidimensional flux-corrected transport algorithms for fluids,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 31, pp. 335–362, 1979.

[11] H. Wang and J. Liu, “Development of CFL-free, explicit schemes for multidimensional advectionreaction equations,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 23, pp.1418–1438, 2001.

[12] G. Hauke, “A simple subgrid scale stabilized method for the advection-diffusion-reaction equation,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 191, pp. 2925–2947, 2002.