A Structure Equation Modeling of Guidelines on Effective Meeting Management in Industrial Business Sector
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research were to investigate guidelines on effective meeting management in different sizes of industrial business corporates, and to develop a structure equation model based on those found guidelines. Quantitative and qualitative research methods were employed in this study. The quantitative data were obtained from interviewing 500 employees responsible for business meeting arrangement. Investigated guidelines on effective meeting management in industrial business sector were of 4 aspects; namely, meeting leader, premeeting operation, meeting operation, and post-meeting operation. Most important guidelines respectively found in each aspect were: punctuality had to be strictly observed, meeting chairperson had to check and recheck the agenda to get ready for the meeting, attendees should honor and respect each other when expressing opinions, and the meeting secretary had to send the minutes of the previous meeting to the participants allowing them to have enough time to consider the resolutions before the next meeting. For the hypothesis testing, it was found that all sizes of industrial business similarly recognized the importance of the guidelines on effective meeting management in the industry sector. The analysis of the developed structure equation model showed that it was in accordance and in harmony with the empirical data and passed the evaluation criteria. Its Chi-square probability level, relative Chi-square, goodness of fit index, and root mean square error of approximation were 0.149, 1.139, 0.970, and 0.017 respectively. The statistical significance of this study was set at 0.05.
Article Details
References
[2] P. Buzz, “Avoid bad meetings,” Bee Culture, vol. 130, pp. 7, 2002.
[3] Faculty of Business Administration, “Research report of management problem level in Provincial Chambers of Commerce,” King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand, 2016 (in Thai).
[4] L. Gulick and L. Urwick, Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration, 1937.
[5] L. A. Allen, Professional Management: New Concepts and Proven Practices. London, England: McGraw-Hill, 1937.
[6] S. P. Robins and M. Coulter, Management, 11th ed., New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2012.
[7] Wikimedia Foundation. (2017, May). PDCA. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Florida, US [Online]. Available: https://th.wikipedia.org/ wiki/PDCA (in Thai)
[8] J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing, “Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 103, pp. 3, pp. 411–423, 1988.
[9] I. Odermatt, C. J. König, M. Kleinmann, R. Nussbaumer, A. Rosenbaum, J. L. Olien, and S. G. Rogelberg, “On leading meetings: Linking meeting outcomes to leadership styles,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 189–200.
[10] B. J. Streibel, The Manager’s Guide to Effective Meetings. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003.
[11] N. Siripraphawan, Professional Meeting and Presentation Techniques. Bangkok, Thailand: Siriwattana Inter Print, 2005.
[12] M. A. Cohen, S. G. Rogelberg, J. A. Allen, and A. Luong. Meeting Design Characteristics and Attendee Perceptions of Staff/Team Meeting Quality. Omaha, Nebraska: Psychology Faculty Publications, 2011.
[13] G. Parker and R. Hoffman, Meeting Excellence: 33 Tools to Lead Meetings that Get Results. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006.
[14] Skills You Need. (2016, Mar.). Planning and Structuring Effective Meetings. Skills You Need. United Kingdom [Online]. Available: http://www.skillsyouneed.com/ips/meetings. html