The Fraction Nonconforming m-of-m Control Chart with Warning Limits

Authors

  • Shashikant Kuber Khilare Department of Statistics, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India
  • Digambar Tukaram Shirke Department of Statistics, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India

Keywords:

Fraction nonconforming, steady-state, Markov chain, runs rules, warning limits

Abstract

This article addresses the development of the fraction nonconforming m-of-m control chart with warning limits to increase the sensitivity of the fraction nonconforming control chart. When the process runs in an in-control state for a long time, it is appropriate to investigate the steady-state average run length. We use average run length, standard deviation of run length and quartiles to measure the performance of the proposed chart under steady-state mode. The Markov chain technique is employed to compute the average run length and standard deviation of run length. The study shows that the proposed runs rule schemes with warning limits performs better than the runs rule schemes without warning limits to detect small to moderate shifts. Usefulness of the proposed control chart is explained by giving the numerical example.

References

Amdouni A, Castagliola P, Taleb H, Celano G. One-sided run rules control charts for monitoring the coefficient of variation in short production runs. Eur J Ind Eng. 2016; 10(5): 639-663.

Antzoulakos DL, Rakitzis AC. The modified r out of m control chart. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2008; 37(2): 396-408.

Bissel AF. An attempt to unify the theory of quality control procedures. Bull Appl Stat. 1978; 5(2): 113-128.

Champ CW, Woodall WH. Exact results for Shewhart control chart with supplementary runs rules. Technometrics. 1987; 29(4): 393-399.

Crosier RB. A new two-sided cumulative sum quality control scheme. Technometrics. 1986; 28(3): 187-194.

Hurwitz AM, Mathur M. A very simple set of process control rules. Qual Eng. 1992; 5(1): 21-29.

Khilare SK, Shirke DT. Fraction nonconforming control chart with m-of-m runs rules. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2015; 78: 1305-1314.

Khoo MBC. Design of runs rules schemes. Qual Eng. 2003; 16(1): 27-43.

Khoo MBC. Increasing the sensitivity of control chart for fraction nonconforming. Qual Eng. 2003; 16(2): 307-319.

Klein M. Two Alternatives to the Shewhart X-bar control chart. J Qual Technol. 2000; 32(4): 427-431.

Lim T, Cho M. Design of control charts with m-of-m runs rules. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2009; 25(8): 1085-1101.

Montgomery DC. Introduction to statistical quality control. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2005.

Page ES. Control charts with warning lines. Biometrics. 1955; 42: 243-257.

Rakitzis AC, Antzoulakos DL. Control charts with switching and sensitizing runs rules for monitoring process variation. J Stat Comput Simul. 2014; 84(1): 37-56.

Roberts SW. Properties of control chart zone tests. Bell Labs Tech J. 1958; 37(1): 83-114.

Shepherd DK, Rigdon SE, Champ CW. Using runs rules to monitor an attribute chart for a Markov process. Qual Technol Quant Manag. 2012; 9(4): 383-406.

Tran KP. Run rules median control charts for monitoring process in manufacturing. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2017; 33(8): 2437-2450.

Tran KP. Designing of run rules t control charts for monitoring changes in the process mean. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2018; 174: 85-93.

Zang S, Wu Z. Designs of control charts with supplementary runs rules. Comput Ind Eng. 2005; 49(1): 76-97.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-29

How to Cite

Kuber Khilare, S. ., & Tukaram Shirke, D. . (2023). The Fraction Nonconforming m-of-m Control Chart with Warning Limits. Thailand Statistician, 21(2), 435–449. Retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thaistat/article/view/249012

Issue

Section

Articles