Estimation of Stress-Strength Reliability of Power Distribution under Type-II Censored Data

Authors

  • Sachin Chaudhary Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Kannauj, U.P. India
  • Srikant Gupta Department of Decision Sciences, Jaipuria Institute of Management, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Jitendra Kumar Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Planning Department, Delhi, India

Keywords:

Maximum likelihood estimator, P[Y<X], right censoring, asymptotic confidence interval, real data

Abstract

In the statistical literature, there are many lifetime distributions used in reliability analysis, including exponential, normal, gamma, and Weibull distributions. Power distribution is also useful in many scientific contexts, with significant consequences for our understanding of natural and man-made phenomena. This expository paper presents the evaluation of reliability when stress and strength follow power distribution with a common scale and different shape parameters. We obtain maximum likelihood (ML) estimates of stress-strength reliability with their confidence intervals. Furthermore, to compare the performance of various procedures, we apply statistical simulation. Finally, an analysis of a real dataset is given for illustrative purposes.

References

Al-Mutairi DK, Ghitany ME, Kundu D. Inferences on stress-strength reliability from Lindley distributions. Commun Stat-Theory Methods. 2013; 42(8): 1443-1463.

Banerjee A, Kundu D. Inference based on type-II hybrid censored data from a Weibull distribution. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2008; 57(2): 369-378.

Birnbaum ZW, McCarty RC. A distribution-free upper confidence bound for P[Y

Birnbaum, Z.W. On a use of Mann-Whitney statistics. Proceeding Third Berkley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1956; 1: 13-17.

Chaudhary S, Kumar J, Tomer SK. Estimation of P[Y< X] for Maxwell distribution. J Stat Manag Syst. 2017; 20(3): 467-481.

Cheng KF, Chao A. Confidence intervals for reliability from stress-strength relationships. IEEE Trans Reliab. 1984; 33(3): 246-249.

Cordeiro GM, dos Santos Brito R. The beta power distribution. Braz J Prob Stat. 2012; 26(1): 88-112.

Dhillon BS. Stress-strength reliability models. Micro Reliab. 1980; 20(4): 513-516.

Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1994.

Gaudoin O, Yang B, Xie M. A simple goodness-of-fit test for the power-law process, based on the Duane plot. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2003; 52(1): 69-74.

Goldstein ML, Morris SA, Yen GG. Problems with fitting to the power-law distribution. Eur Phys J B. 2004; 41(2): 255-258.

Govindarazulu Z. Two-sided confidence limits for P[X< Y] based on normal samples of X and Y. Sankhyā. 1967; 29(2): 35-40.

Juvairiyya RM, Anilkumar P. Estimation of stress-strength reliability for the Pareto distribution based on upper record values. Statistica. 2018; 78(4): 397-409.

Koen C, Kondlo L. Fitting power-law distributions to data with measurement errors. Mon Not R Astron Soc 2009; 397(1): 495-505.

Kumar I, Kumar K. On estimation of P(V< U) for inverse Pareto distribution under progressively censored data. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. 2021; 13(1): 189-202.

Saini S, Chaturvedi A, Garg R. Estimation of stress-strength reliability for generalized Maxwell failure distribution under progressive first failure censoring. J Stat Comput Simul. 2021; 91(7): 1366-1393.

Kumar K, Krishna H, Garg R. Estimation of P(Y< X) in Lindley distribution using progressively first failure censoring. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. 2015; 6(3): 330-341.

Kumar J, Tomer SK. Reliability estimation for negative binomial distribution under Type-II censoring scheme. J Stat Appl Prob. 2016; 5(1): 89-98.

Lorenz MO. Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Am Stat Assoc. 1905; 9(70): 209-219.

Meniconi M, Barry DM. The power function distribution: a useful and simple distribution to assess electrical component reliability. Microele Reliab. 1996; 36(9): 1207-1212.

Okorie IE, Akpanta AC, Ohakwe J, Chikezie DC. The modified power function distribution. Cog Math. 2017; 4(1): 1-20.

Panahi H, Asadi S. Analysis of the type-II hybrid censored burr type XII distribution under linex loss function. Appl Math Sci. 2011; 5: 3929-3942.

Pham T, Almhana J. The generalized gamma distribution: its hazard rate and stress-strength model. IEEE Trans Reliab. 1995; 44(3): 392-397.

Oehlert GW. A note on the delta method. Am Stat. 1992; 46(1): 27-29.

Rigdon SE. Testing goodness-of-fit for the power law process. Commun Stat-Theo Meth. 1989; 18(12): 4665-4676.

Sharma VK, Singh SK, Singh U, Agiwal V. The inverse Lindley distribution: a stress-strength reliability model with application to head and neck cancer data. J Indus Prod Engg. 2015; 32(3): 162-173.

Surles JG, Padgett WJ. Inference for P(Y< X) in the burr type X model. J Appl Stat Sci. 1998; 7(4): 225-238.

Weerahandi S, Johnson RA. Testing reliability in a stress-strength model when X and Y are normally distributed. Technometrics 1992; 34(1): 83-91.

Xia ZP, Yu JY, Cheng LD, Liu LF, Wang WM. Study on the breaking strength of jute fibres using modified Weibull distribution. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2009; 40(1): 54-59.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-29

How to Cite

Chaudhary, S. ., Gupta, S. ., & Kumar, J. . (2024). Estimation of Stress-Strength Reliability of Power Distribution under Type-II Censored Data. Thailand Statistician, 22(3), 701–719. Retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thaistat/article/view/254783

Issue

Section

Articles