Estimation Methods for the Modified Generalized Linear Exponential Distribution and Its Applications in Engineering Data

Authors

  • M.G.M. Ghazal Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Minia University, Minia, Egypt

Keywords:

Modified generalized linear exponential distribution, hazard rate, simulation, Cramer von-Mises estimation, Anderson-Darling estimation

Abstract

This paper investigates different methods for estimating the unknown parameters of the modified generalized linear exponential distribution (MGLED), a flexible lifetime model that can accommodate bathtub-shaped, increasing, and decreasing hazard rate functions. The MGLED is of practical importance in reliability and engineering applications because it includes several well-known lifetime distributions as special cases, such as the exponential, Rayleigh, Weibull, modified Weibull, and generalized linear exponential distributions. Five classical estimation methods are considered, namely maximum likelihood estimation, least squares estimation, weighted least squares estimation, Cramer von-Mises estimation, and Anderson-Darling estimation. The performance of these estimation methods is assessed through two real engineering data sets and an extensive simulation study. For the real data applications, the fitted models are compared using non-parametric goodness-of-fit measures, including the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic with its corresponding P-value, the Anderson-Darling statistic, and the Cramer von-Mises statistic. In addition, parametric model selection criteria, including the Akaike information criterion, the corrected Akaike information criterion, and the Hannan-Quinn information criterion, are used to evaluate the adequacy of the MGLED relative to several competing lifetime models. The simulation study compares the proposed estimation methods in terms of mean squared error and average absolute bias. The numerical results show that the MGLED provides a better fit than the competing models for the considered engineering data sets, while the simulation results indicate that the maximum likelihood estimation and Anderson-Darling estimation methods generally perform better than the other estimation methods as the sample size increases.

References

Aarset MV. How to identify a bathtub hazard rate. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. IEEE Trans.

Reliab. 1987; R-36(1):106–108.

Afify AZ, Gemeay AM, Ibrahim NK. The heavy-tailed exponential distribution: risk measures, estimation, and application to actuarial data. Mathematics. 2020; 8(8):1276.

Bain LJ. Analysis for the linear failure-rate life-testing distribution. Technometrics. 1974; 16(4):551–

Balakrishnan N, Kateri M. On the maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of Weibull distribution based on complete and censored data. Stat Probabil Lett. 2008; 78(17):2971–2975.

Boos DD. Minimum distance estimators for location and goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc. 1981;

(375):663–670.

Cohen AC. Maximum likelihood estimation in the Weibull distribution based on complete and on

censored samples. Technometrics. 1965; 7(4):579–588.

Ghitany ME, AL-Hussaini EK, Al-Jarallah RA. Marshall-Olkin extended Weibull distribution and its

application to censored data. Journal of Applied Statistics. J Appl Stat. 2005; 32(10):1025–1034.

Ibrahim M, Handique L, Chakraborty S, Butt NS, Yousof HM. A new three-parameter xgamma frchet

distribution with different methods of estimation and applications. Pak J Stat Oper.Res. 2021;

(1): 291–308.

Kumar I, Jha S, Kumar K. On some estimation methods for the inverse pareto distribution. Ann Data

Sci. 2021.

Lai CD, Murthy DN, Xie M. Weibull distributions and their applications. Springer London, London;

; 63–78.

MacDonald PDM. Comment on ”An estimation procedure for mixtures of distributions” by Choi and

Bulgren. J R Stat Soc B. 1971; 33(2):326–329.

Mahmoud MAW, Alam FMA. The generalized linear exponential distribution. Stat Probabil Lett.

; 80(11):1005–1014.

Mahmoud MAW, Ghazal MGM, and Radwan HMM. Modified generalized linear exponential distribution: Properties and applications. Stat Optim Inf Comput. 2024; 12:231–255.

Ghazal MGM, Tashkandy YA, Balogun OS and Bakr ME. Exponentiated extended extreme value

distribution: Properties, estimation, and applications in applied fields. AIMS Math. 2024;

(7):17634–17656.

Nelson W. Applied life data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1982.

Okasha HM, Kayid M. A new family of MarshallOlkin extended generalized linear exponential distribution. J Comput Appl Math. 2016; 296:576–592.

Popovic, BV., Risti ´ c, M M., and Cordeiro GM. A two-parameter distribution obtained by com- ´

pounding the generalized exponential and exponential distributions. Mediterr J Math. 2016;

(5):2935–2954.

Swain JJ, Venkatraman S, Wilson JR. Least-squares estimation of distribution functions in johnsons

translation system. J Stat Comput Simul. 1988; 29(4):271–297.

Tian Y, Tian M, and Zhu Q. Transmuted linear exponential distribution: a new generalization of the

linear exponential distribution. Commun Stat Simulat. 2014; 43(10):2661–2677.

Weibull WA. Statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech. 1951; 18(3):293–

Waller A, Gotway C. Applied Spatial Statistics for Public Health Data. New York: John Wiley &

Sons; 2004.

Zeng H, Lan T, Chen Q. Five and four-parameter lifetime distributions for bathtub-shaped failure rate

using Perks mortality equation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2016; 152:307–315.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Ghazal, M. (2026). Estimation Methods for the Modified Generalized Linear Exponential Distribution and Its Applications in Engineering Data. Thailand Statistician, 24(4), 783–802. retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thaistat/article/view/268361

Issue

Section

Articles