ENHANCING GRADUATE INSTRUCTION THROUGH THE ESSENCE PROCESS IN A PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY OF EDUCATION COURSE

Authors

  • Narong Kanchana Songkhla Rajabhat University, Songkhla 90000 Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55003/IJIET.7213

Keywords:

ESSENCE processฃ, Graduate instruction, Philosophy and theory of education, Integrated learning unit, Reflective thinking

Abstract

This classroom action research addressed a persistent research gap concerning the limited availability of structured instructional processes that effectively translate philosophical and educational theory into practice at the graduate level by exploring the use of the ESSENCE instructional process—a seven-step framework designed to bridge theory and practice—in a graduate-level Philosophy and Theory of Education course. Instruction was delivered online over four consecutive weeks through synchronous sessions. The study aimed to (1) examine learning achievement following the intervention, (2) assess graduate students’ ability to design an Integrated Learning Unit synthesizing philosophical and educational theories, contemplative education, experiential learning theory, participatory action research (CPAR), and the sufficiency economy philosophy, and (3) analyze the quality of students’ reflective thinking regarding learning and self-change. Participants were 11 graduate students—all full-time university lecturers from non-education fields (4 doctoral, 7 master’s). The ESSENCE-based intervention comprised four lesson plans. Research instruments included an achievement test (Cronbach’s α = .86), a performance assessment rubric, and a reflective-journal protocol. Quantitative data were analyzed using mean and standard deviation; qualitative data were examined through content analysis. Results indicated gains in learning achievement, with mean scores increasing from 16.20 to 23.11 out of 34. Graduate students demonstrated the ability to translate theory into practice through integrated learning unit design products (equation = 25.05 out of 30),  reflecting creative synthesis of conceptual frameworks with instructional planning. Reflective-journal analysis revealed a shift from externally oriented practice toward internalized professional growth, including increased attention to deep listening and deliberate mental cultivation. Overall, the findings highlight the distinctive contribution of the ESSENCE process in supporting theory-in-action and transformative professional learning by integrating structured public reasoning, collaborative design, and reflective refinement in graduate instruction.

References

Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808.

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001.

Carney, M., Cowie, B., & Moreland, J. (2022). Formative assessment and learning improvement: Research evidence and implications for practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2031823.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2.

Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., III, & Swanson, R. A. (2020). The adult learner (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429299612.

Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). FT Press.

National Economic and Social Development Council. (2023). The 13th national economic and social development plan (2023–2027). Office of the Prime Minister.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.

OECD. (2024). Education at a glance 2024: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en.

Office of the Education Council. (2023). Education in Thailand 2022. Ministry of Education.

Phenwan, T. (2024). How the concept of reflection is taught in higher education: A narrative review. MedEdPublish, 13(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.23153.1.

UNDP. (2007). Thailand human development report 2007: Sufficiency economy and human development. United Nations Development Programme.

UNDP. (2024). Sufficiency economy philosophy: Thailand’s contribution to sustainable development. United Nations Development Programme.

UNESCO. (2012). Education for sustainable development sourcebook. UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023/4: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? (Executive summary). UNESCO.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469- 7610.1976.tb00381.x.

Zajonc, A. (2013). Contemplative pedagogy: A quiet revolution in higher education. In S. R. Steinberg & G. Jean-Marie (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 83–94). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles