DEVELOPMENT OF THE DOUBLE P-CE MODEL INTEGRATED WITH CONTEXT-BASED LEARNING TO ENHANCE CRITICAL THINKING FOR 11TH GRADE STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55003/IJIET.8108Keywords:
Double P-CE model, Critical thinking, Context-based learning, Learning achievementAbstract
This study aimed to: 1) develop a learning facilitation model to enhance critical thinking integrated with context-based learning, 2) compare the learning achievement and critical thinking of the experimental group and control group after using the learning facilitation model, 3) study the students’ satisfaction of the experimental group toward the learning facilitation model. The participants consisted of students in Matthayom 5/3 as the experimental group and students in Matthayom 5/4 as the control group from Watsothonwararamworawiharn School. The research methodology followed a Research and Development. The findings indicated that: 1) The learning facilitation model consisted of four components: the principles of the model, the objectives of the model, the learning facilitation process, which consisted of four steps (Double P-CE model): Step 1: Preparation (P), Step 2: Process (P), Step 3: Conclusion (C), Step 4: Evaluation (E) and the model’s measurement and evaluation methods. and the overall appropriateness of the model was rated at the highest level ( = 4.92, SD = 0.15). 2) The findings from the comparison of posttest learning achievement and critical thinking between the experimental and control groups indicated that the post-test learning achievement of the experimental group, which received the Double P-CE model, was significantly higher than that of the control group, which received traditional teaching, at the .05 level. 3) The experimental group students’ satisfaction with the Double P-CE model designed to develop critical thinking, was at a high level.
References
Bunyodom, N., Ugsonkid, S., & Kasemsukpipat, W. (2023). The effect of learning management based on constructivist theory using hands-on activities of grade 6 students’ geometrical concepts on triangle. Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal, 3(5), 481-496. https://doi.org/10.14456/iarj.2023.263.
Chand, S. P. (2024). Constructivism in education: Exploring the contributions of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner. International Journal of Science and Research, 12(7), 274-278. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR23630021800.
Dehkordi, H. A. (2021). Comparison of context-based learning and traditional method in cognitive and psychomotor domains and critical thinking of undergraduate nursing students. Przegl Epidemiol, 75(3), 424-429. https://doi.org/10.32394/pe.75.39.
Dori, Y. J., Avargil, S., Kohen, Z., & Saar, L. (2018). Context-based learning and metacognitive prompts for enhancing scientific text comprehension. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1198-1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470351.
Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the Nature of “context” in Chemical Education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957-976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470.
Indah, P. P., Herawati, S., & Betty, L. (2023). The Integration of Group Investigation and Reading, Questioning, Answering (GIRQA): An Instructional Model to Enhance Metacognition and Critical Thinking of Students in Science Classroom. Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(4), 214-223. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.04.26.
Khamthanu, K. (2024). Development of teaching methods to promote critical thinking skills and scientific concepts. Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal, 4(1), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2024.273178.
Klockars, A. J. (1992). Evaluating Pretest-Posttest Control Group Experiments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75(1), 96–98. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1992.75.1.96.
Rubini, B., & Ardianto, D. (2021). Empowering contextual approach in science learning to enhance critical thinking skills: Some cases of learning science at secondary school. In A. Permanasari, I. Hamidah, R. Hurriyati, A. G. Abdullah, L. P. Artini, N. N.
Padmadewi, S. Aisyah, V. Andriany, H. S. H. Munawaroh, G. Yuliani, I. Kustiawan, P. I. Rahmawati, Trianasari, A. A. Danuwijaya, C. U. Abdullah, & N. K. Wedhanti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Asian Education Symposium 2020 (AES 2020): Vol. 566. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (pp. 304-307). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210715.064.
Rullis, R. M., & Fauzan, A. (2021). Development of constructivism-based mathematics interactive learning media tools on the material of constructing a flat side space for class VIII junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1742, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1742/1/012031.
Schochet, P. Z. (2010). The late pretest problem in randomized control trials of education interventions. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(4), 379-406. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998609353112.
Siregar, H. D., Salim, A., Jannah, M. R., Nurkhayati, A., & Hidayati, N. (2025). Development of constructivism-based learning models to improve student learning outcomes. Journal of Gateway for Understanding Research in Education, 1(2), 11-19.
https://doi.org/10.69855/guru.v1i2.335.
Vong, S. A., & Kaewurai, W. (2017). Instructional model development to enhance critical thinking and critical thinking teaching ability of trainee students at regional teaching training center in Takeo province, Cambodia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.05.002.
Yulaisa, G., & Desnita, D. (2024). The Effect of Using Context-Based Learning Videos on Fluid Materials on Students Critical Thinking Ability. Journal Pijar Mipa, 19(3), 391-395. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v19i3.6510.
Zandvakili, E., Washington, E., Gordon, E. W., Wells, C., & Mangaliso, M. (2019). Teaching patterns of critical thinking: The 3CA model—Concept maps, critical thinking, collaboration, and assessment. SAGE Open, 9(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019885142.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Industrial Education and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.