Performance Verification of Hybrid Temperature Recorder Monitoring System

Main Article Content

Olarn Wongwirat
Keelati Oonchom
Benjaporn Arnuttinanon


- Currently, the calibration process of burn-in chambers used in a HDD (Hard Disk Drive) production line requires an engineer to manually monitor temperatures at the hybrid temperature recorders throughout the calibration period. It is a time consuming and inefficient operation, due to a large number of burn-in chambers used in the production line comparing with a limited number of engineers to handle. Therefore, the hybrid temperature recorder monitoring system is developed and implemented to improve the monitoring procedure used in the current calibration process of burn-in chambers. There are two subsystems included, i.e., a temperature recording subsystem and a monitoring subsystem, which are connected through a wireless network. The temperature recording subsystem performs capturing temperatures from probes inside the burn-in chamber and sending the temperature data to the monitoring subsystem. The monitoring subsystem receives the temperature data to store in a central server before processing and displaying to the engineer for monitoring in real-time. The system performance is verified by deploying the system to operate in the actual environment of current calibration process. The operation results are verified and used to reflect the system performance in four sections. As the results obtained, the system yields accurate outcomes for the four sections and can reduce the operation time in the calibration process.

Article Details

How to Cite
O. Wongwirat, K. Oonchom, and B. Arnuttinanon, “Performance Verification of Hybrid Temperature Recorder Monitoring System”, JIST, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 50–59, Jun. 2011.
Research Article: Soft Computing (Detail in Scope of Journal)


1. A. Coppola, “Experimental Determination of a More Powerful Burn-In,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R27(3), 1978, pp. 181-182.

2. W. J. Paek, K. Jeong-Min, R. Dae-Geun, S. Young-Bok, and N. Chang-Woo, System for Testing Hard Disk Drives, United States Patent No. US6169413B1, January 2001.

3. E. Angeles, K. Rajput, M. Cruz, A. Almonte, I. Libiran, K. Minor, A. Realdy, M. Li, R. Karr, M. Buchanan, and S. Ajouri, “Burn-In Operations Improvement with Full Automation and OEE/OEU,” Proceedings Internationa Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 2007, pp. 1-4.

4. N. H. Yong, L. H. Yew, and S. Demidenko, “Improving Efficiency of IC Burn-In Testing,” Proceedings 2008 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology, 2008, pp. 1685-1689.

5. M. Zaera, M. Esteve, C.E. Palau, and J.C. Guerri, “Design and Development of an Industrial Monitoring System using Windows NT as a Real-Time Operating System,” Proceedings 7th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 1999, pp. 1249-1257.

6. P. Renton, P. Bender, S. Veldhuls, D. Renton, and M. A. Elbestawi, “Internet-Based Manufacturing Process Optimization and Monitoring System,” Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2002, pp. 1113-1118.

7. K. Kusunoki, I. Imai, H. Ohtani, T. Nakakawaji, M. Ohshima, and K. Ushijima, “A CORBABased Remote Monitoring System for Factory Automation,” Proceedings 1st International Symposium on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing, 1998, pp. 396 - 402.

8. K. Oonchom, B. Arnuttinanon, and O. Wongwirat, “A Development of Hybrid Temperature Recorder Monitoring System,” Proceedings 2010 International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, 2010, pp. 271 - 275.

9. O. Wongwirat, K. Oonchom, and B. Arnuttinanon, “Operation Verification of Hybrid Temperature Recorder Monitoring System,” To be published in the Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA 2011), 2011.