Business Intelligence for Road Network Vulnerability Assessment
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
- At present, a series of road network disruption, being caused by various kinds of events such as natural disasters, and human errors act of human intention, frequently take place around the globe and create a direct impact to all mankind. Configuration has, therefore, played a critical role to the road system planning. In order to initiate the road network vulnerability analysis, it requires all involved parties to have a visibility in accessing all the relevant factors that can create severe impact on the road network at what level. By possessing such valued data, all person-in-charge, then, will be able to identify preventive actions and corrective actions practically. Without any doubts, vulnerability of road network has become one of the precious factors to be counted when it comes down to the road planning process. Attached with this particular research, vulnerability of road network is measured in many different ways and will be taken into consideration as one of the beneficial factor for road planning process. The “significance” of certain road (s) in surface transport network will be named since the vulnerability of road network will identify which traffic link (s) and/or line (s) are cut off, temporarily shut down or severely damaged. The vulnerability measurements are presented and elaborated in graph and GIS.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
I/we certify that I/we have participated sufficiently in the intellectual content, conception and design of this work or the analysis and interpretation of the data (when applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it and have agreed to have my/our name listed as a contributor. I/we believe the manuscript represents valid work. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my/our authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in the covering letter. I/we certify that all the data collected during the study is presented in this manuscript and no data from the study has been or will be published separately. I/we attest that, if requested by the editors, I/we will provide the data/information or will cooperate fully in obtaining and providing the data/information on which the manuscript is based, for examination by the editors or their assignees. Financial interests, direct or indirect, that exist or may be perceived to exist for individual contributors in connection with the content of this paper have been disclosed in the cover letter. Sources of outside support of the project are named in the cover letter.
I/We hereby transfer(s), assign(s), or otherwise convey(s) all copyright ownership, including any and all rights incidental thereto, exclusively to the Journal, in the event that such work is published by the Journal. The Journal shall own the work, including 1) copyright; 2) the right to grant permission to republish the article in whole or in part, with or without fee; 3) the right to produce preprints or reprints and translate into languages other than English for sale or free distribution; and 4) the right to republish the work in a collection of articles in any other mechanical or electronic format.
We give the rights to the corresponding author to make necessary changes as per the request of the journal, do the rest of the correspondence on our behalf and he/she will act as the guarantor for the manuscript on our behalf.
All persons who have made substantial contributions to the work reported in the manuscript, but who are not contributors, are named in the Acknowledgment and have given me/us their written permission to be named. If I/we do not include an Acknowledgment that means I/we have not received substantial contributions from non-contributors and no contributor has been omitted.
References
2. Asakura, Y. 1999. Evaluation of network reliability using stochastic user equilibrium. Journal of Advanced Transportation 33 (2), pp.147-158.
3. Bell, M.G.H. and Y. Iida. 1997. Transportation Network Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
4. Bell, M.G.H.and C. Cassir (eds.). 2000. Reliability of Transport Networks. Baldock, Herts: Research Studies Press. Transport Network Vulnerability 29.
5. Berdica, K., 2002a. An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done. Transport Policy 9, 117–127.
6. Chen, A., Yang, H., Lo, H.K. and Tang, W.H. 1999. A capacity related reliability for transportation networks. Journal of Advanced Transportation 33 (2), 183- 200.
7. Chen, A., Yang, H., Lo, H.K., Tang, W.H., 2002. Capacity reliability of a road network: an assessment methodology and numerical results. Transportation Research Part B 36 (3), 225–252.
8. Chang, S.E. 2000. “Disasters and Transport Systems: Loss, Recovery, and Competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 Earthquake,” Journal of Transport Geography, Vol.8, No.1, pp.53-65.
9. Dijkstra, E.W. 1959. “A note on two problems in connection with graphs.” Numerical Mathematics 1: 269-271.
10. Department Of Highway. 2008. Prefeasibility Study and Initial Envirronment Examination for Executive Summary Report,70-71.
11. FHWA. 1983. “Seismic Retrofitting Guidelines for Highway Bridges.” Report FWHA/RD83/007.
12. Hansen, W.G. 1959. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25, 73-76.
13. Husdal, J. 2004. Reliability and vulnerability versus costs and benefits. 2nd International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR2004): New Zealand.
14. Holmgren,A ° ., 2004. Vulnerability analysis of electrical power delivery networks. Licentiate thesis TRITA-LWR LIC 2020, Department of Land and Water Resources Engineering, KTH, Stockholm.
15. Immers, L.H., Stada, J.E., Yperman, I., Bleukx, A., 2004. Robustness and resilience of transportation networks. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Scientific Conference MOBILITA, Bratislava, Slovenia, May 6–7.
16. Iida Y, Bell MGH (eds) 2003 The network reliability of transport. Pergamon-Elsevier, Oxford Koenig JG (1980) Indicators of urban accessibility: theory and application. Transportation 9:145–172.
17. Jenelius, E. 2007. Incorporating dynamic and information in consequence model for road network vulnerability analysis. INSTR 2007: The Netherlands.
18. Koenig, J.G. 1980. Indicators of urban accessibility: theory and application. Transportation 9, 145-172.
19. Lam WHK (ed) 1999 Special issue on transport network reliability. J Adv Transp 33(2):121–251.
20. Lam, W.H.K. and Xu, G. 2000. Calibration of traffic flow simulator for network reliability assessment. In Reliability of Transport Networks. Edited by M.G.H. Bell and C. Cassir. Baldock, Herts: Research Studies Press, 139-157.
21. Morris, J.M., Dumble, P.L. and Wigan, M.R. 1979. Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research 13A, 91-109.
22. Nicholson, A.J., Du, Z.P., 1994. Improving network reliability: a framework. In: Proceedings of 17th Australian Road Research Board Conference, pp. 1–17.
23. Nicholson, A. and Du, Z. P. (1997). ‘Degradable transportation systems: An integrated equilibrium model’. Transportation Research Part B, 31, pp.209-223.
24. Nicholson, A.J. and Dalziell, E. 2003. Risk evaluation and management: a road network reliability study. In The Network Reliability of Transport. Edited by Y. Iida and M.G.H. Bell. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier, 45-59.
25. Nicholson, A.J. and Dante, A. (eds.). 2004. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR04). Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
26. Niemeier, D. A. 1997. Accessibility: an evaluation using consumer welfare. Transportation 24, 377-396.
27. Primerano, F. 2003. Towards a policy-sensitive accessibility measure. Papers of the Australasian Transport Research Forum 27, paper no 35, CD-ROM. Wellington: Transit New Zealand.
28. Richardson, A.J. and Taylor, M.A.P. 1978. A study of travel time variability on commuter journeys. High Speed Ground Transportation Journal 12 (1), 77- 99.
29. State of Minnesota. 2008. “Economic impacts of the I-35W bridge collapse.” Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, Minnesota Department of Transport. PM.
30. Taylor MAP 1999 Dense network traffic models, travel time reliability and traffic management II: application to reliability. J Adv Transp 33(2):235–251 Taylor MAP (2000) Using network reliability concepts for traffic calming—permeability, approachability and tortuosity—in network design. In: Bell MGH, Cassir C (eds) Reliability of transport networks. Research Studies, Baldock, Herts, pp 217–242.
31. Taylor MAP, D’Este GM 2004a Critical infrastructure and transport network vulnerability: developing a method for diagnosis and assessment. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR04). Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, pp 96–102.
32. Yang, H., Lo, H.K. and Tang, W.H. 2000. Travel time versus capacity reliability of a road network. In Reliability of Transport Networks. Edited by M.G.H. Bell and C. Cassir. Baldock, Herts: Research Studies Press, 119-138.
33. Nectec 2004 Online], The Great Asian Earthquake and Tsunami 2004, Available : https://www.nectec.or.th/users/htk/20041226- quake/
34. Thairath 2010 Online], Road network Vulnerability in Khao Yai, Thailand, Available: https://www.thairath.co.th/today/view/119426
35. Thairath 2011 Online], Flooding in South of Thailand, Available : https://www.thairath.co.th/feed/4