การทดสอบค่าสัมประสิทธิ์การแปรผันของปริมาณฝุ่นละอองขนาดเล็ก (PM2.5) ของอำเภอหาดใหญ่ จังหวัดสงขลา
คำสำคัญ:
การทดสอบสมมติฐาน, ค่าวัดการกระจาย, การแจกแจงแกมมา, มลพิษทางอากาศบทคัดย่อ
The biggest impact of particulate air pollution on public health is understood to be from long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5), which increases the age-specific mortality risk, particularly from cardiovascular causes. Usually, the hourly PM2.5 level fits a gamma distribution, and this has led us to consider testing this via the coefficient of variation (CV) of these data. Herein, we present two statistical methods for testing the CV in a gamma population based on the Score and Wald methods. To compare their performances, a simulation study was conducted under several shape parameter values for a gamma distribution. The performances of the test statistics were compared based on their empirical type I error rates and powers of the test. Their performances were then illustrated by applying them to the hourly PM2.5 level in Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand. The simulation results show that the test statistic based on the Wald method performed better than the one based on the Score method in terms of the attained nominal significance level and is thus recommended for analysis in similar scenarios.
Keyword: Hypothesis testing, Measure of dispersion, Gamma distribution, Air pollution
References
Albatineh, A.N., Boubakari, I., & Kibra, B.M.G. (2017). New confidence interval estimator of the signal-to-noise ratio based on asymptotic sampling distribution, Communication in Statistics-Theory and Methods. 46(2): 574-590.
Albatineh, A.N., Kibria, B.M.G., Wilcox, M.L., & Zogheib, B. (2014). Confidence interval estimation for the population coefficient of variation using ranked set sampling, Journal of Applied Statistics. 41(4): 733-751.
Bakowskia, A., Radziszewskia, L., & Žmindak, M. (2017). Analysis of the coefficient of variation for injection pressure in a compression ignition engine, Procedia Engineering. 177: 297-302.
Bedeian, A.G., & Mossholder, K.W. (2000). On the use of the coefficient of variation as a measure of diversity, Organizational Research Methods. 3(3): 285-297.
Calif, R., & Soubdhan, T. (2016). On the use of the coefficient of variation to measure spatial and temporal correlation of global solar radiation, Renewable Energy. 88: 192-199.
Castagliola, P., Celano, G., & Psarakis, S. (2011). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using EWMA charts, Journal of Quality Technology. 43(3): 249-265.
Döring, T.F., & Reckling, M. (2018). Detecting global trends of cereal yield stability by adjusting the coefficient of variation, European Journal of Agronomy. 99: 30-36.
Faber, D.S., & Korn, H. (1991). Applicability of the coefficient of variation method for analyzing synaptic plasticity, Biophysical Journal. 60(5): 1288-1294.
Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. (1996). R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. 5(3): 299-314.
Kang, C.W., Lee, M.S., Seong, Y.J., & Hawkins, D.M. (2007). A control chart for the coefficient of variation, Journal of Quality Technology. 39(2): 151-158.
McKay, A.T. (1932). Distribution of the coefficient of variation and the extended t distribution, Journal of the Royal Statistics Society. 95(4): 695-698.
McKenzie, J.D. (2004). Minitab Student Release 14: Statistical Software for Education. Boston: Pearson Addison-Wesley.
Nairy, K.S., & Rao, K.A. (2003). Tests of coefficients of variation of normal population, Communication in Statistics-Simulation and Computation. 32(3): 641-646.
Narita, D., Oanh, N.T.K., Sato, K., Huo, M., Permadi, D.A., Chi, N.N.H., Ratanajaratroj, T., & Pawarmart, I. (2019). Pollution characteristics and policy actions on fine particulate matter in a growing Asian economy: the case of Bangkok metropolitan region, Atmosphere. 10(5): 227.
Panichkitkosolkul, W. (2009). Improved confidence intervals for a coefficient of variation of a normal distribution, Thailand Statistician. 7(2): 193-199.
Reed, G.F., Lynn, F., & Meade, B.D. (2002). Use of coefficient of variation in assessing variability of quantitative assays, Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology. 9(6): 1235-1239.
Sangnawakij, P., & Niwitpong, S. (2017). Confidence intervals for functions of coefficients of variation with bounded parameter spaces in two gamma distributions, Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology. 39(1): 27-39.
Vangel, M. G. (1996). Confidence intervals for a normal coefficient of variation, The American Statistician. 50(1): 21-26.
World Bank. (2016). The cost of air pollution. Washington: World Bank.
Xing, Y.F., Xu, Y.H., Shi, M.H., & Lian, Y.X. (2016). The impact of PM2.5 on the human respiratory system, Journal of Thoracic Disease. 18(1): E69-74.

Downloads
เผยแพร่แล้ว
How to Cite
ฉบับ
บท
License
การดำเนินงานภายใต้ Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0