SELECTION OF MAINTENANCE STRATEGY FOR GAS TURBINE SYSTEM IN COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANT

Main Article Content

Jittra Rukijkanpanich
Punnawit Ritthidet

Abstract

More than forty percent of electricity in Thailand is generated from combined cycle power plants. This type of power plant uses a combination of gas turbine and steam turbine systems. From the study of the past 2.5 years of the power plant case study found that the gas turbine system caused the power plant to shut down suddenly, accounting for 88.7% of all sudden downtime. This research focused on strategy maintenance improvement in gas turbine system by analyzing the criticality of the equipment to determine the appropriate maintenance strategy. The analysis results could be divided into 4 levels of criticality, 278 items of level A, 94 items of level B, 197 items of level C, and 267 items of level D, representing 33%, 11%, 24%, 32% respectively. Use a proactive maintenance (PaM) strategy for devices with critical A level. Use preventative maintenance (PM) strategy for devices with critical B levels. Use a corrective maintenance strategy (CM) for levels C and D. After implementing the maintenance strategy for one year, the results showed that the average value of sudden breakdown of the power plant decreased from 2,371.48 hours per year to 1,094 hours per year, representing a decrease of 53.86%.  The availability of power plants increased from 86.18% to 93.18%.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

[1] Paul Breeze. Gas Turbine Power Generation, 2016.
[2] สำนักงานโยบายและแผนพลังงาน. แผนพัฒนากำลังผลิตไฟฟ้าของประเทศไทย พ.ศ. 2561-2580 (PDP2018), 2019
[3] Nowlan, F. S., & Howard, ADAM SVENSSON F. H. (1978). Reliability-Centered Maintenance. Report No. AD-A066579. United Airlines, San Francisco, 1978.
[4] Norsok z-008. Criticality analysis for maintenance purposes, 2011
[5] Alexander börjesson, Adam Svensson. Critical equipment classification and cost reduction within professional maintenance. Master of Science Thesis in
Production Engineering.Chalmers University of Technology, 2011.
[6] Paul A. Ozor, Joseph O. Aniobasi, Chimaobi K. Olua. Critical Equipment Identification Approach for Condition-Based Maintenance Planning in a Beverage Plant.
Industrial Engineering Letters, 2015 Vol 5.
[7] Fe´lix C. Go´mez de Leo´n Hijes, Jose´ Javier Ruiz Cartagena. Maintenance strategy based on a multicriterion classification of equipments. Reliability Engineering
and System Safety, 2006, pp. 444–451.
[8] GT24/26 Operation, Power Plant Training Center, ALSTOM ,2014.
[9] GT24/26 Overview & Introduction, Gas Turbine Fundamentals, ALSTOM, 2010.
[10] Rukijkanpanich, J. and Mingmongkol, M. Enhancing performance of maintenance in solar power plant. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 2019.
[11] Dr. E.C. Fitch. Proactive Maintenance for Mechanical Systems, 1992.
[12] สุภนิติ แสงธรรม, การบำรุงรักษาเน้นความเชื่อถือได้. กรุงเทพมหานคร. เอ็ม แอนด์ อี, 2560
[13] T.Álvarez Tejedor, R.Singh, P.Pilidis. Advance gas turbine asset and performance management. Modern Gas Turbine System, 2013, pp. 515-564, 593.
[14] Tim J Cater. Common failures in gas turbine blades. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2005, pp. 237–247.
[15] G.H. Farrahi, M. Tirehdast, E. Masoumi Khalil Abad, S. Parsa, M. Motakefpoor. Failure analysis of gas turbine compressor. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2011.
[16] Meherwan Boyce. Maintenance Techniques. Gas Turbine Engineering Handbook, 2011.