PERFORMANCE OF UNPAVED ROAD REINFORCED WITH TRIAXIAL GEOGRIDS SUBJECTED TO BEARING PRESSURE

Main Article Content

ฺBurassakorn Boonyakama
Pitthaya Jamsawang
Nuttawut Thanasisathit
Uthairith Rochanavibhata
Hatthairat Poorahong

Abstract

This article studies the effectiveness of unpaved roads reinforced with triaxial geogrids. The unpaved road comprises subgrade and base layers. The subgrade and base considered in this study were low-plasticity clay and crust rock, respectively. The model test was performed in a square steel mold 1.5 m in width and 1.2 m in height. The subgrade thickness was fixed at 0.8 m, whereas the crust rock thicknesses varied from 0.05 to 0.2 m. The triaxial geogrid was inserted between the subgrade and the crust rock layers. The static bearing capacity tests were conducted on the unpaved road models according to the standard TIS 1253-62. The results show that using the triaxial geogrid enhances bearing capacity by 1.46 times and reduces the crust rock thicknesses. Thus, the triaxial geogrid reinforcement can be effectively utilized in unpaved road construction.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

J. Leng, Characteristics and behavior of geogrid reinforced aggregate under cyclic loading, doctorial diss., North Carolina State University, NC, 2002.

B.A. MIR. Geosynthetics Applications In Highway Construction In J&K: Sustainable Infrastructure Development. Journal on Structural Engineering: State-of-the-art and State-of-Practice in Structural Engineering, 2014, 3 (3), pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.26634/jste.3.3.3060.

B.A. Mir, S. Ashraf, Evaluation of Load-Settlement Behaviour of Square Model Footings Resting on Geogrid Reinforced Granular Soils. In: Shehata, H., Das, B. (eds) Advanced Research on Shallow Foundations. GeoMEast 2018. Sustainable Civil Infrastructures. Springer, Cham. Chp, 2019, 9, pp. 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01923-5_9

Q.S. Banyhussan, H.A. hassan, A.J. Kadhum. Performance of reinforced subbase materials by geogrid as a base layer under weak subgrade. E3S Web of Conferences (ICGEE 2023), 2023. 427: 03008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342703008.

S.K. Shukla Geosynthetics and their applications. London: Thomas Telford Publishing; 2002.

G.T. Mehrjardi, A. Ghanbari, H. Mehdizadeh. Experimental study on the behaviour of triaxial geogrid-reinforced slopes with respect to aggregate size. Geotext. Geomembranes, 2016, 44 (6), pp.862–871.

Q. Chen, S. Hanandeh, M. Abu-Farsakh, L., Mohammad. Performance evaluation of full-scale geosynthetic reinforced flexible pavement. Geosynth., 2018.Int. 25 (1), pp. 26–36.

M. Esmaeili, J.A. Zakeri, M. Babaei. Laboratory and field investigation of the effect of triaxial geogrid-reinforced ballast on railway track lateral resistance. Geotext. Geomembranes, 2017, 45 (2), pp. 23–33.

X. Sun, J. Han, R. Corey, 2017. Equivalent modulus of triaxial geogrid-stabilized granular base back-calculated using permanent deformation. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9) 06017012.

J.Q. Wang, L.L. Zhang, J.F. Xue, Y. Tang, Load-settlement response of shallow square footings on triaxial geogrid-reinforced sand under cyclic loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2018, 46, pp.586–596.

Q. Chen, M. Abu-Farsakh, R. Sharma. Experimental and analytical studies of reinforced crushed limestone. Geotext. Geomembr, 2009, 27 (5), pp. 357–367.

Q. Chen, M. Abu-Farsakh. Ultimate bearing capacity analysis of strip footings on reinforced soil foundation. Soils Found, 2015, 55 (1), pp.74–85.

L. Suku, S.S. Prabhu, G.L.S. Babu, 2017. Effect of triaxial geogrid-reinforcement in granular bases under repeated Loading. Geotext. Geomembr, 2017, 45, pp.377-389.

M.Y. Fattah, M.R. Mahmood, M.F. Aswad, Stress Distribution from Railway Track over Geogrid Reinforced Ballast underlain by Clay. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2019, 18 (1), pp.77-93.

M.Y. Fattah, N.M. Salim, M.S. Ismaiel, Influence of Geogrid Reinforcement of Sand in Transfer of Dynamic Loading to Underground Structure. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 856 012013, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 856. Doi:10.1088/1755-1315/856/1/012013.

B.A. Mir, B.A. Wani, N. Ahmad, R. Ayoub, J. Aziz, Comparative Study on Load-Settlement Behavior of Shallow Footings on Dredged Material underlain by a Rigid Base. World Res J Civ Eng, 2014, 3 (1), pp.34-38.

Q. Chen, An Experimental Study on Characteristics and Behavior of Reinforced Soil Foundation. Doctoral Dissertation 3361, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 2007.

Q. Chen, M. Abu-Farsakh. Mitigating the bridge end bump problem: A case study of a new approach slab system with geosynthetic reinforced soil foundation. Geotext. Geomembr, 2016, 44, pp.39–50.

C.C. Huang, M.Y. Al-Aghbari, Y.E.A. Mohamedzein, Ultimate bearing capacity of saturated reinforced horizontal ground. Geosynth. Int, 2006, 23, pp. 1–8.

M. Mosallanezhad, N. Hataf, S.S. Taghavi. Experimental and large-scale field tests of grid-anchor system performance in increasing the ultimate bearing capacity of granular soils. Can. Geotech. J. 2016, 53, pp.1047–1058.

Perkins SW Geosynthetic reinforcement of flexible pavements: laboratory-based pavement test sections. Federal Highway, 1999.Administration Report No. FHWA/MT-99-001/81838

C.-C. Huang, F. Tatsuoka. Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy ground. Geotext. Geomembr, 1990, 9, pp. 51–82.

Q. Chen, Triaxial Geogrid-Enhanced Modulus and Stress Distribution in Clay Soil Geotechnics, 2024, 4, pp. 41–53.

Zhou, J., Kong, X.L., Wang, X.C. Bearing capacity behaviours and failure models of reinforced ground. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2008, 30 (9), pp.1265–1269 (In Chinese)

Kazi, M., Shukla, S.K., Habibi, D. An improved method to increase the load-bearing capacity of strip footing resting on geotextile-reinforced sand bed. Indian Geotech. J, 2015, 45 (1), pp. 98–109.

ASTM D854-23 Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer, 2023.

ASTM D4318-17e1 Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils, 2018.

ASTM D1557-12 Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort, 2021.

ASTM D6913/D6913M-17 Standard Test Method for Particle-size Distribution of Soil Using Sieve Analysis, 2021.

ASTM D7928-21e1 Standard Test Method for Particle-size Distribution Soil Using the Sedimentation (Hydrometer) Analysis, 2021.

ASTM D1883-21 Standard Test Method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Laboratory Compacted Soil, 2021.

มยผ.1253-62 มาตรฐานการทดสอบความสามารถในการรับน้ำหนักบรรทุกของดิน, กรมโยธาและผังเมือง, กระทรวงมหาดไทย พ.ศ.2562

Lutenegger, A.J. and Adams, M.T. Bearing Capaicty of Footings on Compacted Sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 123(1): 30–36. Proceedings: Fourth International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, St. Louis, Missouri, March 9-12, 1998.

Lekshmi Suku, Sudheer S. Prabhu, G.L. Sivakumar Babu Effect of triaxial geogrid-reinforcement in granular bases under repeated Loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2017, 45, pp. 377-389

Binquet, J., Lee, K.L. Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng, 1975, 101 (12), pp. 1241–1255.

Badakhshan, E., & Noorzad, A. Load eccentricity effects on behavior of circular footings reinforced with triaxial geogrid sheets. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 7 (6), pp. 691–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.08.006

Xu, Y., Yan, G., Williams, D.J., Serati, M., Scheuermann, A., & Vangsness, T. Experimental and numerical studies of a strip footing on geosynthetic-reinforced sand. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotech, 2019, 20 (5), pp. 1–14

Ahmet Demir, Mustafa Laman, Abdulazim Yildiz, Murat Ornek Large scale field tests on triaxial geogrid-reinforced granular fill underlain by clay soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2013, 38, pp. 1-15

Bowles, J. E. Foundation Analysis and Design. 4th ed., McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, USA, 1998.

Sharma, R., Q. Chen, M. Abu-Farsakh, and S. Yoon. Analytical modeling of triaxial geogrid reinforced soil foundation. Geotext. Geomembr, 2009, 27 (1) pp. 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.07.002.

Chen, Q., M. Abu-Farsakh, and R. Sharma. “Experimental and analytical studies of reinforced crushed limestone.” Geotext. Geomembr, 2009, 27 (5), pp. 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.002.

Chen, Q., and M. Abu-Farsakh. Ultimate bearing capacity analysis of strip footings on reinforced soil foundation. Soils Found, 2015, 55 (1), pp. 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.12.006.