The Adaptive Hybrid MCDA for Land Use Prioritization: Case Study Dry Port Size Analysis

Authors

  • Patiphan Kaewwichian Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Khon Kaen Campus, Thailand.
  • Wantana Prapaporn Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Khon Kaen Campus, Thailand.
  • Prin Nachaisit Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Khon Kaen Campus, Thailand.
  • Suparerk Charmongkolpradit Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Khon Kaen Campus, Thailand.
  • Haris Prasanchum Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Khon Kaen Campus, Thailand.
  • Wuttikrai Chaipanha Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Khon Kaen Campus, Thailand.
  • Warunvit Auttha Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Khon Kaen Campus, Thailand.
  • Boonyaporn Duangsa Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Khon Kaen Campus, Thailand.

Keywords:

dry port, multi criteria decision analysis, plot area, prioritization analysis

Abstract

The development of Dry Ports serves as a crucial strategy in modern logistics, enhancing supply chain efficiency and resilience. The boundary area of Dry Ports necessitates the integration of diverse analytical approaches to ensure their effective area development, within 3 Main criteria’s and 16 Minor’s factors. The comprehensive framework that amalgamates Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) including SAW, TOPSIS and VIKOR, size analysis, and land use planning represented the alternative of effective boundaries. The result revealed the size of the Dry Port context. Considering conventional and TOPSIS land acquisition prioritization presents the pricing effectiveness. Additionally, sensitivity analysis indicates that the distance between the dry port and the conventional railway network identified as the most influential factor significantly impacts effectiveness once it exceeds 35%.

References

O. B. Adekoya, J. A. Oliyide, O. T. Kenku, and O. F. Ajayi, “China’s technological spillover effect on the energy efficiency of the BRI countries,” Energy Policy, vol. 182, p. 113740, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113740.

M. Zaman, A. Ullah, C. Pinglu, and M. Kashif, “Sustainable Silk roads future: Examining the nexus of inflation, regional integration, globalization and sustainability in BRI economies,” Sustainable Futures, vol. 7, p. 100172, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100172.

S. C. Joyce, A. Meeran, and A. Agrawal, “A global population-driven perspective on South-East Asia’s air transport growth prospects in the 21st century,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 56, pp. 79–87, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.09.010.

C. Nedopil, “Countries of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI),” Green Finance & Development Center, FISF Fudan University, Shanghai, China, 2025. [Online]. Available from : https://greenfdc.org/countries-of-the-belt-and-road-initiative-bri/

Q. Lin, K. Zhang, D. Huang, M. Grifoll, and H. Feng, “Evaluating the impact of Trans-Asian railway on logistics mode selection between Thailand and China: An AHP-TOPSIS approach,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 98, pp. 147–158, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2024.04.041.

V. Roso, J. Woxenius, and K. Lumsden, “The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland,” J Transp Geogr, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 338–345, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.10.008.

J. Woxenius, V. Roso, and K. Lumsden, “The dry port concept—Connecting seaports with their hinterland by rail,” in First International Conference on Logistics Strategy for Ports (ICLSP), Dalian, China, September. 22–26, 2004, pp.305-319.

X. Zhao and Z. Sun, “Investment modes in dry port with network effect under regionally competitive environment,” J Transp Geogr, vol. 121, p. 103987, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103987.

G. Kurnia, Hanan Fatika Adzkia, and Nur Layli Rachmawati, “Dry Port Location Selection: A Case Study of Tanjung Intan Port,” Journal of Emerging Supply Chain, Clean Energy, and Process Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 45–58, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.57102/jescee.v2i1.53.

X. Feng, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, and W. Wang, “A Location-Allocation Model for Seaport-Dry Port System Optimization,” Discrete Dyn Nat Soc, vol. 2013, pp. 1–9, 2013, doi: 10.1155/2013/309585.

J. Guo, Z. Wang, and X. Yu, “Accessibility measurement of China’s coastal ports from a land-sea coordination perspective - An empirical study,” J Transp Geogr, vol. 105, p. 103479, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103479.

Zainuddin, Nizamuddin, et al. "A Review on Development Challenges for an Inland Port at Malaysia-Thailand Border." Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 2, no. 6, 2021, pp. 113-125, doi:10.55197/qjssh.v2i6.114.

H. Flämig and M. Hesse, “Placing dryports. Port regionalization as a planning challenge – The case of Hamburg, Germany, and the Süderelbe,” Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 42–50, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2011.08.005.

M. F. De Souza, P. H. G. Pinto, R. B. A. Teixeira, C. de O. L. Nascimento, and R. A. de A. Nóbrega, “Dry port location optimization to foster sustainable regional development,” Sustentabilidade em Debate, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 208–237, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.18472/SustDeb.v11n2.2020.27073.

R. Bergqvist, C. Macharis, D. Meers, and J. Woxenius, “Making hinterland transport more sustainable a multi actor multi criteria analysis,” Research in Transportation Business & Management, vol. 14, pp. 80–89, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.10.009.

K. Komchornrit, “The Selection of Dry Port Location by a Hybrid CFA-MACBETH-PROMETHEE Method: A Case Study of Southern Thailand,” The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 141–153, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.09.004.

Z. Chang, T. Notteboom, and J. Lu, “A two-phase model for dry port location with an application to the port of Dalian in China,” Transportation Planning and Technology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 442–464, May 2015, doi: 10.1080/03081060.2015.1026103.

H. Wei and Z. Sheng, “Dry Ports-Seaports Sustainable Logistics Network Optimization: Considering the Environment Constraints and the Concession Cooperation Relationships,” Polish Maritime Research, vol. 24, no. s3, pp. 143–151, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1515/pomr-2017-0117.

O. K. Bhatti and A. R. Hanjra, “Development prioritization through analytical hierarchy process (AHP) - decision making for port selection on the one belt one road,” Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 121–150, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1108/JCEFTS-04-2019-0020.

D. S. Augustin, D. L. Akossiwa, and D. N. Esther, “Dry Port Development in Togo: A Multi-Criteria Approach Using Analytic Network Process [ANP],” American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, vol. 09, no. 06, pp. 1301–1317, 2019, doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2019.96086.

S. Tadić, M. Krstić, V. Roso, and N. Brnjac, “Dry Port Terminal Location Selection by Applying the Hybrid Grey MCDM Model,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 17, p. 6983, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12176983.

J. Božičević, I. Lovrić, D. Bartulović, S. Steiner, V. Roso, and J. Pašagić Škrinjar, “Determining Optimal Dry Port Location for Seaport Rijeka Using AHP Decision-Making Methodology,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 6471, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13116471.

V. G. Mohan and M. A. Naseer, “Prioritisation of Dry Port Locations Using MCDM Methods: A Case of Cochin Port,” Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 841–856, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40030-022-00648-y.

M. M. H. Chowdhury and Z. Haque Munim, “Dry port location selection using a fuzzy AHP-BWM-PROMETHEE approach,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 301–329, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1057/s41278-022-00230-0.

Y. Kaymaz and U. G. Çiçekli, “Selection of Dry Port Locations Using PROMETHEE Approach: Case for Türkiye”, JEBUPOR, vol. 8, no. "Cumhuriyet’in 100. Yılında Türkiye’nin Sosyo-Ekonomisi" Özel Sayısı, pp. 21–38, 2023, doi: 10.25204/iktisad.1192459.

S. Rekabi and zeinab sazvar, “A Circular Human-Centric Dry Port-Seaport Network with Viability Dimension: A Case Study,” 2024. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5002215.

T. M. H. Nguyen, Arjan van Binsbergen, and C. T. Dinh, “Dry port location selection for integration with inland waterway transport in developing countries: A case study in Northern Vietnam,” Journal of Supply Chain Management Science, vol. 5, no. 1–2, pp. 1–29, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.59490/jscms.2024.7743.

The Office of Transport and Traffic Policy and Planning (OTP), “Study to prepare a master plan for the development of a land port (Dry Port) to lead to being the logistics center of the region,” The Office of Transport and Traffic Policy and Planning, Ministry of transport, Bangkok, Thailand, Final report, 2018.

C. Macharis and A. Bernardini, “Reviewing the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: Time for a multi-actor approach,” Transp Policy (Oxf), vol. 37, pp. 177–186, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.11.002.

W. Alajali, W. Zhou, S. Wen, and Y. Wang, “Intersection Traffic Prediction Using Decision Tree Models,” Symmetry (Basel), vol. 10, no. 9, p. 386, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.3390/sym10090386.

G. Yannis, A. Kopsacheili, A. Dragomanovits, and V. Petraki, “State-of-the-art review on multi-criteria decision-making in the transport sector,” Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 413–431, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jtte.2020.05.005.

Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. “About us.” Accessed: March. 19, 2024. [Online.] Available from: https://www.gcc.

go.th/?page_id=101

S. M. Müller, M. Liebherr, E. Wegmann, and M. Brand, “Decision Making – A Neuropsychological Perspective,” in Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience, 2nd edition, Elsevier, 2022, pp. 396–403. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819641-0.00132-8.

E. Broniewicz and K. Ogrodnik, “Multi-criteria analysis of transport infrastructure projects,” Transp Res D Transp Environ, vol. 83, p. 102351, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102351.

J. J. Thakkar, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, vol. 336. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-981-33-4745-8.

J. Wątróbski, J. Jankowski, P. Ziemba, A. Karczmarczyk, and M. Zioło, “Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection,” Omega (Westport), vol. 86, pp. 107–124, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004.

C. L. Hwang, K. Yoon, C.L. Hwang, and K. Yoon, “Methods for multiple attribute decision making.” in Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey, 1981, pp. 58-191.

T. L. Saaty, “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process,” Eur J Oper Res, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26, Sep. 1990, doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.

T. L. Saaty, “How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Interfaces (Providence), vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 19–43, Dec. 1994, doi: 10.1287/inte.24.6.19.

N. G. Raad, S. Rajendran, and S. Salimi, “A novel three-stage fuzzy GIS-MCDA approach to the dry port site selection problem: A case study of Shahid Rajaei Port in Iran,” Comput Ind Eng, vol. 168, p. 108112, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108112.

T. Y. Pham, H. M. Ma, and G. T. Yeo, “Application of Fuzzy Delphi TOPSIS to Locate Logistics Centers in Vietnam: The Logisticians’ Perspective,” The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 211–219, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.12.004.

E. Özceylan, M. Erbaş, M. Tolon, M. Kabak, and T. Durğut, “Evaluation of freight villages: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis,” Comput Ind, vol. 76, pp. 38–52, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2015.12.003.

L. C. Nguyen and T. Notteboom, “A Multi-Criteria Approach to Dry Port Location in Developing Economies with Application to Vietnam,” The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 23–32, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.03.003.

A. Rikalovic, I. Cosic, and D. Lazarevic, “GIS Based Multi-criteria Analysis for Industrial Site Selection,” Procedia Eng, vol. 69, pp. 1054–1063, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.090.

S. Shahparvari, A. Nasirian, A. Mohammadi, S. Noori, and P. Chhetri, “A GIS-LP integrated approach for the logistics hub location problem,” Comput Ind Eng, vol. 146, p. 106488, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106488.

F. K. P. Hui, L. Aye, and C. F. Duffield, “Engaging Employees with Good Sustainability: Key Performance Indicators for Dry Ports,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 2967, May 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11102967.

A. Taibi and B. Atmani, “Combining Fuzzy AHP with GIS and Decision Rules for Industrial Site Selection,” International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 6, p. 60, 2017, doi: 10.9781/ijimai.2017.06.001.

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Kaewwichian, P. ., Prapaporn, W., Nachaisit, P. ., Charmongkolpradit, S. ., Prasanchum, H. ., Chaipanha, W. ., Auttha, W. ., & Duangsa, B. . (2025). The Adaptive Hybrid MCDA for Land Use Prioritization: Case Study Dry Port Size Analysis . Engineering Access, 12(1), 86–98. retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/mijet/article/view/256312

Issue

Section

Research Papers