A Structural Equation Modeling of Factors Affecting the Implementation of Architecture Framework for Electronic Transaction Documents Interchange Using Blockchain Technology
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were (1) to analyze factors affecting the implementation of architecture framework for electronic transaction documents interchange using Block chain Technology; and (2) to analyze the goodness-of-fit with empirical data of the developed structural equation model of factors affecting the implementation of architecture framework for electronic transaction documents interchange using Block chain Technology. This study was a quantitative research. The sample was selected based on cluster random sampling. The sample of this study consisted of 500 electronic transaction users from 20 ministries. The total number of 500 copies of a questionnaire was used as the data collecting instruments. Data collected were then analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). The results of this study indicated that the most direct influential factor for implementation of architecture framework for electronic transaction documents interchange using Block chain Technology was the strategy/policy factor, followed by the technology factor, the society and culture factor, and the semantics factor, respectively. In contrast, the most indirect influential factor for implementation of architecture framework for electronic transaction documents interchange using Block chain Technology was the society and culture factor through the strategy/policy factor, followed by the technology factor through the semantics factor, and the strategy/policy factor through the semantics factor, respectively. In conclusion, the strategy/policy factor, society and culture factor, technology factor, and semantics factor were factors influencing the implementation of architecture framework for electronic transaction documents interchange using Block chain Technology.
Article Details
References
Chirapunya, K. (2018). Technical and Legal Feasibility Study of Using “Blockchain” For Preventing the Illegal Issuing Land Right Documents. Thesis of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Criminology and Criminal Justice. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
Comrey, A. L. and Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Psychology Press.
Gem. (2017). Blokchain Healthcare 2016 Report – Promise and Pitfalls. [Online]. Retrieved May 23, 2018, from: https://gem.co.
Hair, J. F. J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd ed. CA: Sage.
Haber, S., and Stornetta, W. S. (1991). How to time-stamp a digital document. Journal of Cryptology, 3(2). 99-111.
Keretho, S. (2017). Cross-border Single Window Interoperability (based on a new UNNExT Guide). The Proceedings of the International conference on Cross-border Paperless Trade, Single Window in the context of the New Technology Wave, Moscow, Russian Federation, 7-8 December 2017, 6-8.
Meijer, W. K., Middendorp, D., Raes, J. M. and Tubbing, R. (2017). Digital Voting Pass. Thesis of the Degree of Bachelor in Science. Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Merkle, R. C. (1988). A Digital Signature Based on a Conventional Encryption Function. Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO, 87, 369-378.
Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. (2010). Thailand Digital Economy and Society Development Plan (2018-2037). [Online]. Retrieved February 2, 2019, from: https://www.dga.or.th/upload/download/file_9fa5ae40143e13a659403388d226efd8.pdf. (in Thai)
National Science Technology and Innovation Policy Office. (2017). Digital Government Technology Roadmap. [Online]. Retrieved Jan 10, 2017, from: https://www. dga.or.th/th/content/920/13589.
NIST. (2014). Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurit [Online].Retrieved Feb 2, 2019, from: http:22www.nist.gov/cyberfreamwork.
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer to peer electronic cash system. [Online]. Retrieved January 10, 2017, from: http://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
Office of the Public Sector Development Commission. (2005). Report of Sector Development Commission year 2005. Bangkok: Office of the Public Sector Development Commission.
Popatchai. (2018). Digital Money – Blockchain [Online]. Retrieved January 10, 2017,From: https://www.prachachat.net/columns/news-127289.
Santhanamery, T. and Ramayah, T. (2012). Continued Usage Intention of E-Filing: The Role of Optimism Bias. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(1), 397–403.
Srupsrisopa. (2018). Importance and investment in the blockchain evolution. [Online]. Retrieved January 27, 2018, from: https://www.marketingoops.com/insiders.
Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. (Vol. 6). California: O'Reilly Media.
Tapscott, D., and Tapscott, A. (2015). Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin and Other Cryptocurrencies is Changing the World. New York: Penguin Pub.
Thoppae, C. and Praneetpolgrang, P. (2018). The Investigation and Design of Blockchain Archiecture for Secure Nation e-Transaction Services. The Proceedings of the International Conference of Robotics, Informatics, and Intelligent control Technology (RIIT2018), Bangkok Thailand On September, 5-6, 2018, 68-73.
Tierion. (2017). Blockchain Healthcare 2016 Report – Promise & Pitfalls. [Online]. Retrieved May 23, 2018, https://tierion.com/blog/blockchain-healthcare-2016-report/.