Airflow Study for a Cluster of Campus Buildings using Different Turbulence Modeling Approaches

Authors

  • Danko Davidovic Department of Architectural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA, Huber Engineered Woods, Commerce, GA, 30530, USA
  • Jiying Liu Department of Architectural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA, School of Thermal Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, 250101, China
  • Mohammad Heidarinejad Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA
  • Jelena Srebric Department of Architectural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56261/built.v3.170267

Keywords:

Turbulent eddy viscosity, Zero-equation (ZEQ) turbulence model, Revised “Kato-Launder” turbulence model (MMK), Smagorinsky Subgrid-scale model (SMG), Airflow around multiple buildings, Wind tunnel experiment

Abstract

btaining accurate numerical simulations of airflows for actual building clusters is time consuming due to a vast variety of characteristic flow patterns, combined with a wide spectrum of spatial and temporal scales. In order to provide a faster, yet reliable and simple modeling approach for simulation of outdoor airflow around multiple buildings, the presentstudy evaluated a performance of the modified zero-equation turbulence model (ZEQ). A comprehensive set of velocity field measurements in the wind tunnel experiment was conducted, and the results were used to calibrate the ZEQ model. Additional measured data are used for the validation of different turbulence modeling approaches. The performance of the modified and improved zero-equation turbulence model was compared to the revised “Kato-Launder” version of the “k-ε” model (MMK), and Large Eddy Simulations(LES) using the standard Smagorinsky Subgrid-scale model (SMG). The validation revealed a satisfactory performance of the calibrated ZEQ turbulence model in predicting streamwise mean velocity profiles, and demonstrated its comparative competitiveness with the two other turbulence modeling approaches. A less than satisfactory agreement between numerical results and measured data was identified in the prediction of vertical and lateral velocity components regardless of the turbulence modeling approach. Overall, the calibrated ZEQ turbulence model provided results that were comparable to MMK and SMG and required substantially smaller computational resources. An additional outcome of the present study is a recommendation for future research to improve performance of the calibrates ZEQ turbulence model using more advanced experimental techniques and implementation of macroscopic morphological parameters to account for realistic representation of the buildings settings in urban areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barlow, J. B., Rae, W. H. & Pope, A. (1999). Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing. New York, UK: Wiley.

Bartzis, J. G., Vlachogiannis, D. & Sfetsos, A. (2004). Thematic area 5: Best practice advice for environmental flows. The QNET-CFD Network Newsletter, 2(4), 34-39.

Blocken, B., Carmeliet, J. & Stathopoulosc, T. (2007). CFD evaluation of wind speed conditions in passages between parallel buildings—effect of wall-function roughness modifications for the atmospheric boundary layer flow. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 95(9-11), 941-962.

Blocken, B. & Gualtiieri, C. (2012). Ten iterative steps for model development and evaluation applied to Computational Fluid Dynamics for Environmental Fluid Mechanics. Environmental Modelling & Software, 33, 1-22.

Blockena, B., Stathopoulosb, T., Carmelietc, J. & Hensena, J. L. M. (2011). Application of computational fluid dynamics in building performance simulation for the outdoor environment: An overview. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 4(2), 157-184.

Blocken, B. J. E., Stathopoulos, T., Saathoff, P. & Wang, X. (2008). Numerical evaluation of pollutant dispersion in the built environment: comparisons between models and experiments. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96(10-11), 1817-1831.

Blocken, B., Tominaga, Y. & Stathopoulos, T. (2013). CFD simulation of micro-scale pollutant dispersion in the built environment. Building and Environment, 64, 225- 230.

Bruun , H. H. (1995). Hot-Wire anemometry: Principles and signal analysis. USA: Oxford University Press

Cermark, J. E., Cochran, L. S. & Leflier, R. D. (1995). Wind- tunnel modelling of the atmospheric surface layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 54-55, 505-513.

Cheng, Y., Lien, F. S., Yee, E. & Sinclair, R. (2003). A comparison of large Eddy simulations with a standard k–e Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes model for the prediction of a fully developed turbulent flow over a matrix of cubes. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 91, 1301-1328.

Chen, Q. & Xu, W. (1998). A zero-equation turbulence model for indoor airflow simulation. Energy and Building, 28(2), 137-144.

Chungloo, S. (2012). Numerical Simulation of Forced Convective Heat Transfer Coefficients on Shaded Roofs with Wind Circulation in Low-Rise Buildings. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies, 9(2), 63-80.

Cook, N. J. (1978). Determination of the model scale factor in wind-tunnel simulations of the adiabatic atmosphericboundary layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2(4), 311-321.

Davidovic, D. (2009). Improvements in numerical airflow modeling around multiple buildings [PhD]. PA: The Pennsylvania State University

Delaunay, B. (1934). Sur la sphère vide. A la mémoire de Georges Voronoï. Bulletin de l’Académie des Sciences de l’URSS. Classe des sciences mathématiques et na, 6, 793–800.

Franke, J., Hellsten, A., Schlunzen, H. K. & Carissimo, B. (2007). The COST 732 Best Practice Guideline for CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment: a summary. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 44, 419-427.

Gousseau, P., Blocken, B.J.E., Stathopoulos, T. & Heijst, G.J.F. van (2011). CFD simulation of near-field pollutant dispersion on a high-resolution grid : a case study by LES and RANS for a building group in downtown Montreal. Atmospheric Environment, 45(2), 428-438.

Hanson, T., Smith, F., Summers, D. & Wilson, C. B. (1982). Computer simulation of wind flow around buildings. Computer-aided Design, 14(1), 27-31.

Hefny, M. M. & Oooka, R. (2009). CFD analysis of pollutant dispersion around buildings: Effect of cell geometry. Building and Environment, 44(8), 1699-1706.

Huang, S., Li, Q. S. & Xu, S. (2007). Numerical evaluation of wind effects on a tall steel building by CFD. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63(5), 612-627.

Hu, CH., Ohba, M. & Yoshie, R. (2008). CFD modelling of unsteady cross ventilation flows using LES. Journal ofWind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96 (10-11), 1692-1706.

Isyumov, N. (1999). Wind tunnel studies of buildings and structures [ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice], 14-15. Reston, VA: Aerospace Division of ASCE.

Janssen, W. D., Blocken, B. & Hooff, T. V. (2013). Pedestrian wind comfort around buildings: Comparison of wind comfort criteria based on whole-flow field data for a complex case study. Building and Environment, 59, 547-562.

Kato, M. & Launder, B. E. (1993). The modelling of turbulent flow around stationary and vibrating square cylinders. Proceeding of 9th Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Kyoto, August 1993 (pp. 10.4.1-10.4.6). Kyoto, Japan.

Lateb, M., Masson, C., Stathopoulos, T. & Bédard, C. (2010). Numerical simulation of pollutant dispersion around a building complex. Building and Environment, 45(8), 1788-1798.

Letzel, O. L., Krane, M. & Raasch, S. (2008). High resolution urban large-eddy simulation studies from street canyon to neighborhoods scale. Atmospheric Environment, 42(38), 8770-8784.

Li, C., Li, X., Su, Y. & Zhu, Y. (2012). A new zero-equation turbulence model for microscale climate simulation. Building and Environment, 47, 243-255.

Lim, H. C., Thomas, T. G. & Casto, I. P. (2009). Flow around a cube in a turbulent boundary layer: LES and experiment.Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 97(2), 96-109.

Liu, C-H. , Cheng, W. C., Leung , T. C. Y. & Leung, D. Y.C. (2011). On the mechanism of air pollutant re-entrain- ment in two-dimensional idealized street canyons. Atmospheric Environment, 45(27), 4763–4769.

Liu, J., Srebric, J. & Yu, N. (2013). Numerical simulation of convective heat transfer coefficients at the external surfaces of building arrays immersed in a turbulent boundary layer. International Journal of Heat and MassTransfer, 61, 209-225.

Ludwig, J. C. (Ed.). (2010). PHOENICS-VR Reference Mannual. London, UK: CHAM.

Maruyamaa, T., Taniguchib, T., Okazakic, M. & Taniikeb, Y. (2008). Field experiment measuring the approaching flows and pressures on a 2.4 m cube. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96(6-7), 1084-1091.

Mochida, A. & Lun, I. Y. F. (2008). Prediction of wind environment and thermal comfort at pedestrian level in urban area. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96(10-11), 1498-1527.

Montazeri, H. & Blocken, B. (2013). CFD simulation of wind-induced pressure coefficients on buildings with and without balconies: Validation and sensitivity analysis. Building and Environment, 60, 137-149.

Murakami, S. (1993). Comparison of various turbulence models applied to a bluff body. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 46-47, 21-36.

Murakami, S. (1998). Overview of turbulence models applied in CWE-1997. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 74(6), 1-24.

Nozawaa, K. & Tamurab, T. (2002). Large eddy simulation of the flow around a low-rise building immersed in a roughwall turbulent boundary layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 90(10), 1151- 1162.

Petchdee, P. & Chungloo, S. (2013). Improvement of Louvers and Openings of Factory Building to Remove Heat through Natural Wind. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies, 10(2), 31-44.

Qian, Y. (2004). Development of an Algebraic Turbulence Model for Airflow and Contaminant Simulations around a Building. M.Sc. Thesis, Dept. of Architectural Engineering. The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA.

Qian, Y. & Srebric, J. (2011). Development and Validation of an Algebraic Turbulence Model for Outdoor Airflow and Contaminant Simulations around a Building.International Journal of Building, Urban, Interior and Landscape Technology, 1(1), 43-51.

Ramponi, R. & Blocken, B. (2012a). CFD simulation of crossventilation for a generic isolated building: Impact of computational parameters. Building and Environment, 53, 34-48.

Ramponi, R. & Blocken, B. J. E. (2012b). CFD simulation of cross-ventilation flow for different isolated building configurations: validation with wind tunnel measure- ments and analysis of physical and numerical diffusion effects.Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 104-106, 408-418.

Remennikov, A. M. & Rose, T. A. (2005). Modelling blast loads on buildings in complex city geometries. Computers and Structures, 83(27), 2197-2205.

Roache, P. J. (1998). Verification and validation in compu- tational science and engineering. New Mexico: Hermosa Publishers.

Roache, P. J. (1994). Perspective: A method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 116(3), 405-413.

Salim, S. M., Cheah, S. C. & Chan, A. (2011). Numerical simulation of dispersion in urban street canyons with avenue-like tree plantings: comparison between RANS and LES’. Building and Environment, 46(9), 1735-1746.

Santiago, J. L., Dejoan, A., Martilli, A., Martin, F. & Pinelli, A. (2010). Comparison between large-eddy simulation and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes computations for the MUST field experiment. Part I: Study of the flow for an incident wind directed perpendicularly to the front array of containers. Boundary-layer meteorology, 135(1). pp. 109-132.

Scaperdas, A. & Gilham, S. (2004). Thematic Area 4: Best practice advice for civil construction and HVAC. The QNET-CFD Network Newsletter, 2(4), 28-33.

Shi, R. F., Cuia, G. X., Wangb, Z. S., Xua, C. X. & Zhanga, Z. S. (2008). Large eddy simulation of wind field and plume dispersion in building array. Atmospheric Environment, 42(6), 1083-1097.

Stathopoulos, T. (1997). Computational wind engineering: Past achievements and future challenges. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 67-68, 509-532.

Tantasavasdi, C., Sreshthaputra, A., Suwanchaiskul, A. & Pichaisak, M. (2009). Predicting Airflow in Naturally- ventilated Generic Houses. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies, 6(1), 31-46.

Tominaga, Y., Mochida, A., Yoshie, R., Kataoka, H., Nozu, T. & Yoshikawa M, et al. (2008). AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96(10-11), 1749–1761.

Tominaga, Y. & Stathopoulos, T. (2010). Numerical simulation of dispersion around an isolated cubic building: Model evaluation of RANS and LES. Journal of Building and Environment, 45(10), 2231-2239.

Tsuchiya, M., Murakami, S., Mochida, A., Kondo, K. & Ishida, Y. (1997). Development of a new kappa-epsilon model for flow and pressure fields around bluff body. Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics, 67-68, 169-182.

Xie, Z. & Castro, I. P. (2006). LES and RANS for turbulent flow over arrays of wall-mounted obstacles. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 76(3), 291-312.

Yakhot, A., Anor, T., Liu, H. P. & Nikitin, N. (2006). Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow around a wallmounted cube: spatio-temporal evolution of largescale vortices. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 566, 1-9.

Yoshihide, T., Akashi, M., Shuzo, M. & Satoshi, S. (2008). Comparison of various revised k-[epsilon] models and LES applied to flow around a high-rise building model with 1:1:2 shape placed within the surface boundary layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96(4), 389-411.

Zhang, Y. Q., Arya, S. P. & Snyder, W. H. (1996). A comparison of numerical and physical modeling of stable atmospheric flow and dispersion around a cubical building. Atmospheric Environment, 30(8), 1327-1345.

Downloads

Published

2014-10-30

How to Cite

Davidovic, D., Liu, J., Heidarinejad, M., & Srebric, J. (2014). Airflow Study for a Cluster of Campus Buildings using Different Turbulence Modeling Approaches. International Journal of Building, Urban, Interior and Landscape Technology (BUILT), 3, 33–58. https://doi.org/10.56261/built.v3.170267