Between User’s Practice and Infrastructure Condition: Safety Challenges of E-scooters Utilization in Bangkok, Thailand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56261/built.v21.247898Keywords:
Bangkok, e-scooters, micromobility, safety, urban mobilityAbstract
In Bangkok, e-scooters have become one of the transportation options for many users. Despite the growing number of users, e-scooters remain illegal to operate on public roads. The absence of regulations raises concerns about the safety of utilizing e-scooters in Bangkok. This paper aims to explore the safety challenges associated with the use of e-scoters in Bangkok, based on the practice of users and the infrastructure condition. Semi-structured interview with purposive sampling is conducted for Group A (n=6) and Group B (n=2) to discover the situation from the perspective of users, supplier, and service provider. Additionally, a combination of user interviews and field observations was conducted to assess the infrastructure. Thematic analysis was applied to analyze the interview data, leading to the identification of four themes: infrastructure condition, users practice, accident experience, and maintaining safety. The findings reveal that both user practices and infrastructure conditions contribute to the safety of e-scooters utilization in Bangkok. These include dispersed speed usage, unsafe space choice, and the lack of bike lane availability. To improve safety, Bangkok needs more bike lanes and parking spaces, standardized e-scooters use, and e-scooters education platforms. Policymakers must consider regulating and standardizing the use of e-scooters in Bangkok for its safety.
Downloads
References
Almannaa, M. H., Ashqar, H. I., Elhenawy, M., Masoud, M., Rakotonirainy, A., & Rakha, H. (2021). A comparative analysis of e-scooter and e-bike usage patterns: Findings from the City of Austin, TX. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(7), 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1833117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1833117
Anderson-Hall, K., Bordenkircher, B., O’neil, R., & Smith, C. S. (2019). Governing Micro-Mobility: A Nationwide Assessment of Electric Scooter Regulations. Transportation Research Board 98th Annual Meeting.
Bai, L., Liu, P., Guo, Y., & Yu, H. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Risky Behaviors of Electric Bicycles at Signalized Intersections. Traffic Injury Prevention, 16(4), 424–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2014.952724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2014.952724
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cao, Z., Zhang, X., Chua, K., Yu, H., & Zhao, J. (2021). E-scooter sharing to serve short-distance transit trips: A Singapore case. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 147, 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.03.004
Chen, P., Liu, Q., & Sun, F. (2018). Bicycle parking security and built environments. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 62, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.02.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.02.020
Cresswell, JW., & Plano Clark, VL. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks.
de Bortoli, A., & Christoforou, Z. (2020). Consequential LCA for territorial and multimodal transportation policies: method and application to the free-floating e-scooter disruption in Paris. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 122898. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.122898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122898
Dobromirov, V., Verkhorubov, V., & Chernyaev, I. (2018). Systematizing the factors that determine ways of developing the vehicle maintenance system and providing vehicle safety. Transportation Research Procedia, 36, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.052
Eccarius, T., & Lu, C. C. (2020). Adoption intentions for micro-mobility – Insights from electric scooter sharing in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102327
Field, C., & Jon, I. (2021). E-Scooters: A New Smart Mobility Option? The Case of Brisbane, Australia. Planning Theory and Practice, 22(3), 368–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1919746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1919746
Goldman, T., & Gorham, R. (2006). Sustainable urban transport: Four innovative directions. Technology in Society, 28(1–2), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.007
Gössling, S. (2020). Integrating e-scooters in urban transportation: Problems, policies, and the prospect of system change. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102230
Hardt, C., & Bogenberger, K. (2019). Usage of e-Scooters in Urban Environments. Transportation Research Procedia, 37, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.178
Haworth, N., Schramm, A., & Twisk, D. (2021). Comparing the risky behaviours of shared and private e-scooter and bicycle riders in downtown Brisbane, Australia. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 152, 105981. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AAP.2021.105981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.105981
Hedvall, K., Dubois, A., & Lind, F. (2016). Analysing an activity in context: A case study of the conditions for vehicle maintenance. Industrial Marketing Management, 58, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.016
Hollingsworth, J., Copeland, B., & Johnson, J. X. (2019). Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters You may also like Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8
ITDP. (2021). Maximizing Micromobility: Unlocking Opportunities to Integrate Micromobility and Public Transportation. https://www.itdp.org/publication/maximizing-micromobility/
ITF. (2020). Safe Micromobility. https://www.itf-oecd.org/safe-micromobility
Jensen, P., Rouquier, J. B., Ovtracht, N., & Robardet, C. (2010). Characterizing the speed and paths of shared bicycle use in Lyon. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(8), 522–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.07.002
King, C. C. S., Liu, M., Patel, S., Goo, T. T., Lim, W. W., & Toh, H. C. (2020). Injury patterns associated with personal mobility devices and electric bicycles: An analysis from an acute general hospital in Singapore. Singapore Medical Journal, 61(2), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2019084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2019084
Lanza, K., Burford, K., & Ganzar, L. A. (2022). Who travels where: Behavior of pedestrians and micromobility users on transportation infrastructure. Journal of Transport Geography, 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103269
Ma, Q., Yang, H., Mayhue, A., Sun, Y., Huang, Z., & Ma, Y. (2021). E-Scooter safety: The riding risk analysis based on mobile sensing data. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105954 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105954
Meyer, G., & Shaheen, S. (2017). Lecture Notes in Mobility Disrupting Mobility Impacts of Sharing Economy and Innovative Transportation on Cities. http://www.springer.com/series/11573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51602-8
Murthy, D. N. P., Atrens, A., & Eccleston, J. A. (2002). Strategic maintenance management. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 8(4), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510210448504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510210448504
Nikolaj, S., Blomberg, F., Moeller Rosenkrantz, O. C., Lippert, F., Christensen, H. C., Stig, M., & Fasmer Blomberg, N. (2019). Injury from electric scooters in Copenhagen: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open, 9, 33988. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033988
Oeschger, G., Carroll, P., & Caulfield, B. (2020). Micromobility and public transport integration: The current state of knowledge. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102628
O’hern, S., & Estgfaeller, N. (2020). A scientometric review of powered micromobility. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(22), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229505
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: 3rd Edition Sage Publications.
Pazzini, M., Cameli, L., Lantieri, C., Vignali, V., Dondi, G., & Jonsson, T. (2022). New Micromobility Means of Transport: An Analysis of E-Scooter Users’ Behaviour in Trondheim. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), 7374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127374
PS Intelligence. (2021). Thailand Micromobility Market Research Report: By Type (E-Scooters, E-Bikes, E-Mopeds, E-Pods, Bikes, Scooters), Model (First- and Last-Mile, Multimodal), Sharing System (Docked, Dockless) - Industry Analysis and Growth Forecast to 2030. https://www.psmarketresearch.com/market-analysis/thailand-micromobility-market
Shafi, U., Safi, A., Shahid, A. R., Ziauddin, S., & Saleem, M. Q. (2018). Vehicle remote health monitoring and prognostic maintenance system. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8061514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8061514
Shah, N. R., Aryal, S., Wen, Y., & Cherry, C. R. (2021). Comparison of motor vehicle-involved e-scooter and bicycle crashes using standardized crash typology. Journal of Safety Research, 77, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.03.005
Sheller, M. (2011). Mobility. Sociopedia. https://doi.org/10.1177/205684601163
Störmann, P., Klug, A., Nau, C., Verboket, R. D., Leiblein, M., Müller, D., Schweigkofler, U., Hoffmann, R., Marzi, I., & Lustenberger, T. (2020). Characteristics and injury patterns in electric-scooter related accidents—A prospective two-center report from Germany. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051569
Thornley, S. J., Woodward, A., Langley, J. D., Ameratunga, S. N., & Rodgers, A. (2008). Conspicuity and bicycle crashes: Preliminary findings of the Taupo Bicycle Study. Injury Prevention, 14(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2007.016675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2007.016675
Ulrich, K. T. (2005). Estimating the technology frontier for personal electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 13(5–6), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2006.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2006.01.002
Yang, H., Ma, Q., Wang, Z., Cai, Q., Xie, K., & Yang, D. (2020). Safety of micro-mobility: Analysis of E-Scooter crashes by mining news reports. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105608
Zagorskas, J., & Burinskiene, M. (2020). Challenges caused by increased use of E-powered personal mobility vehicles in European cities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010273
Zhu, R., Zhang, X., Kondor, D., Santi, P., & Ratti, C. (2020). Understanding spatio-temporal heterogeneity of bike-sharing and scooter-sharing mobility. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101483
Zuniga-Garcia, N., Ruiz Juri, N., Perrine, K. A., & Machemehl, R. B. (2021). E-scooters in urban infrastructure: Understanding sidewalk, bike lane, and roadway usage from trajectory data. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(3), 983–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.04.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Building, Urban, Interior and Landscape Technology (BUILT)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
