Defining Townscape Characteristic of Chiang Mai Old City of Thailand through Townscape Character Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56261/built.v21.249546Keywords:
Townscape, Socio-cultural value, Townscape Character Assessment, Chiang Mai, StreetscapeAbstract
Townscape in urban heritage sites contributes a vital visual perception of the public realm. It consists of the streetscape, buildings, natural features, and human perception, which include the social, cultural, and way of life on the scenes. Historic Townscape represents tangible and intangible scenes related to historical artifacts and the historical value of the places. Townscape Character Assessment (TCA) can apply to evaluate the quality of urban elements which represent the significance of social, cultural, and human perception of urban heritage. However, Chiang Mai City Council should have paid more attention to the valued process of establishing a townscape character assessment policy and has not been part of the ongoing heritage preservation process. In the critical urban heritage environment of Chiang Mai Old City, the aim is to define the townscape characteristics of the city and to be used as fundamental knowledge to establish the suitable Townscape Character Assessment (TCA) for Chiang Mai Old City.
This research study has considered four aspects in terms of townscape Character Assessment Policy study that could establish the Townscape Characteristics of Chiang Mai Old City. These are the quality of the streetscape; cultural expression; perceptual factors; and socio-cultural values. Generally, Townscape Character Assessment employs the four significant factors to value townscape characteristics. This study has considered the ongoing new world heritage site as Chiang Mai is a “living heritage” which has faced the loss of greenery, cleanliness, and identity in its inner city and is likely to have issues when the city becomes a heritage tourism destination. The study involved twenty-five local participants and used a mixed methodology consisting of questionnaires, photo-elicitation interviews (PEI), needle method, and in-depth interviews. The results found that the connection of religious places, urban heritage artifacts, cultural activities, and the natural colors of local flowers in the city represented its characteristics. The study revealed possible factors to evaluate a townscape character assessment policy for CMOC, including the physical need for streetscape improvement, cultural expression along the streetscapes, perception of the quality of the streetscapes, and representation of socio-cultural values of the streetscapes. These results can be implemented in developing assessment guidelines for any heritage sites undergoing heritage nomination or any historical cities concerned with townscape character.
Downloads
References
Allison, N., Ray, K., & Rohel, J. (2021). Mobilizing the streets: The role of food vendors in urban life. Food, Culture & Society, 24(1), 2–15. http://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2020.1860454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2020.1860454
Angus, J. (2020). Guidelines for landscape and visual impact assessment (GLVIA3). Landscape Visual. https://www.landscapevisual.com/townscape-character-assessment-and-urban-development/
Banks, M. (2001). Visual method in social research. SAGE Publishing: California, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020284
Bertaux, D. (1981). From the life-history approach to the transformation of sociological practice. In D. Bertaux (Ed.), Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences. (pp.29-45). SAGE Publishing
Brigden, T. (2018). Value in the view: Conservation historic urban view. RIBA Publishing.
Brounéus, K. (2011). In-depth interviewing: The process, skill and ethics of interviews in peace research. In K. Höglund, & M. Oberg (Eds.), Understanding peace research. (pp 130-145). Routledge.
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Tiesdell, S., & Oc, T. (2010). Public places urban spaces. Routledge.
Cheshmehzangi, A., & Heath, T. (2012). Urban identities: Influences on socio-environmental values and spatial inter-relations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 253–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.028
Cross, J. E. (2001). What is sense of place? In 12th headwaters conference, November 2–4, Western State College. . Available online: http://www.western.edu/academics/headwaters/headwatersconference/archives/Headwaters12. (accessed on 1 October 2020)
Colchester Borough Council (2006). Townscape character assessment of Colchester, Tiptree, West Mersea and Wivenhoe. Chris Blandford Associates Environment Landscape Planning.
Deinet, U. (2009). Methodenbuch Sozialraum (Method book for social space), Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften. | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden. pp. 65-86, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91363-6_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91363-6_5
Desouza, K. C., & Flanery, T. H. (2013). Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities a conceptual framework. Cities, 35, 89-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
Doğan, H.A. (2020). Perception of the modern movement in architecture as cultural heritage. Art History & Criticism, 16(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.2478/mik-2020-0004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mik-2020-0004
Erkartal, P. O., & Uzunkaya, A. (2019). Transparency as a component of public space. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471(9). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092026
Gibson, L. (2009). Cultural landscapes and identity. In L. Gibson & J. R. Pendlebury (Eds), Valuing historic environments (pp. 67-92). Ashgate.
Ginzarly, M., & Teller, J. (2018). Eliciting cultural heritage values: Landscape preferences vs representative images of the city. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 8(3), 257-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2017-0031
Harper, D. (1997). Visualizing structures: Reading surfaces of social life. Qualitative Sociology, 20, 57–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024764214854
Heisley, D. D., & Levy, S. J. (1991). Autodriving: A photoelicitation technique. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1086/209258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209258
Jacobs, A. (1993). Great streets. MIT Press.
Jacobs, A. (2010). The importance of streets. In: H.C. Kiang (Ed.), On Asian streets and public space. Ridge Books.
Jacobs, A. (2011). The good city: Reflections and imaginations. Routledge.
Jeffery, A. (2020). Townscape assessment. Available online: https://www.landscapevisual.com/townscape-character-assessment-and-urban-development/ (accessed on 1 October 2020)
Kim, S.S., Lee, J.-S., Lee, D.H., & Choi, Y. (2021). Citizens’ preference and perception of street trees of main boulevards in Busan, South Korea. Sustainability,13(6), 3141. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063141
Kluckhohn, C., & Mowrer, O. H. (1944). Culture and personality: A conceptual scheme. American Anthropologist, 46(1), 1-29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/662924 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1944.46.1.02a00020
Koohsari, M., Sugiyama, T., Lamb, K., Villanueva, K., & Owen, N. (2014). Street connectivity and walking for transport: Role of neighborhood destinations. Preventive Medicine, 66, 118-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.019
Landscape Institute. (2020). Guidelines for landscape and visual impact assessment (GLVIA3) (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Landry, C. (2002) The Creative City. Available online: http://www.read‐ ing.ac.uk/AcaDepts/kc/CMandE/PeBBu/state_of_art/urban_approaches/creative_city/creative_city.htm (accessed on 1 October 2020)
Lipe, W. (1984). Value and meaning in cultural resources. In H. Cleere (Ed.), Approaches to the archaeological heritage. Cambridge University Press.
Lynch, K. (1981). A theory of good city form. MIT Press.
Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews [63 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3), Art. 8. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100387.
Mason, R. (2002). Assessing values in conservation planning: Methodological issues and choices, assessing the values of cultural heritage (pp.5-30). The Getty Conservation Institute.
Mathews, G.L., Kask, S., & Stewart, S. (2004, August 1-4). The Value of the view: Valuing scenic quality using choice and contingent valuation models. The American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, United States.
May, M. A. (1930). A comprehensive plan for measuring personality. In Proceedings and Papers of the Ninth International Congress of Psychology (pp. 298-300). Princeton.
Mehta, V. (2011). Small businesses and the vitality of main street. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 28, 271-291.
Moe, Kyaw Zwa. (2001). Chiang Mai is losing its “Green and Clean”. The Irrawaddy. Retrieved June 3, 2019, from https://www2.irrawaddy.com/article.php?art_id=2411
Montgomery, J. (1995). Animation: A plea for activity in urban places. Urban Design Quarterly, 53(January), 15-17.
Morse, J.M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp.220-235). Sage.
Muangyai, N., & Lieorungruang, V. (2008). Cultural landscape analysis of Doi Suthep-Pui National Park, Chiang Mai. Silpakorn University International Journal, 8,39-72.
Ongsakul, S., Millar, D., & Barron, S. (2005). History of Lan Na. Silkworm Books.
Oranratmanee, R., & Sachakul, V. (2014). Streets as public spaces in Southeast Asia: Case studies of Thai pedestrian streets. Journal of Urban Design,19(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.870465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.870465
Perry, B., Ager, L., & Sitas, R. (2020). Cultural heritage entanglements: Festivals as integrative sites for sustainable urban development. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 26(6), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1578987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1578987
Phetsuriya, N. (2023). A study of the inter-relationship of identity and urban heritage in Chiang Mai old city, Thailand [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Nottingham.
Phetsuriya, N., & Heath, T. (2021). Defining the distinctiveness of urban heritage identity: Chiang Mai old city. Thailand. Social Sciences, 10(3),101. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10030101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10030101
Portella, A. (2014). Visual pollution advertising, signage and environmental quality. Ashgate.
Prachatham.com. (2021). Chiang Mai council assemble Lanna Architects to improve the cultural landscape the inner city to support the nomination of heritage site process [online] Available at: <https://prachatham.com/th/node/11404> [Accessed 1 August 2021].
Reeve, A., Goodey, B., & Shipley, R. (2007). Townscape assessment: The development of a practical tool for monitoring and assessing visual quality in the built environment. Urban Morphology, 11(1), 25–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v11i1.3932
Rehan, R. (2013) Sustainable streetscape as an effective tool in sustainable urban design. HBRC Journal, 9(2), pp.173-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.03.001
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Elam, G. (2003). Designing and selecting samples. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers (pp.77-108). Sage.
Romcai, C. (2007). Application of vernacular characteristics on shop houses in Chiang Mai historic district from residents’ perceptions [Master’s thesis]. Chiang Mai University. (in Thai).
Rooney, J., & Houlston, I. (2017). Townscape character assessment. Landscape Institute. London. https://landscapewpstorage01.blob.core.windows.net/www-landscapeinstitute-org/2017/12/tin-05-2017-townscape.pdf
Roopa, S., & Rani, M.S. (2012). Questionnaire designing for a survey. J Ind Orthod Soc, 46(4), 273-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0974909820120509S
Santosa, H., Ernawati, J., & Wulandari, L. D. (2018). Visual quality evaluation of urban commercial streetscape for the development of landscape visual planning system in provincial street corridors in Malang, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 126(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012202
Shao, Y. (2014). Local identity identification & assessment: The theory, methodology and practice of discovering local identity in Yantai, China [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Sheffield.
Sourachai T. (2006). A study on the changes of urban vista in Rattanakosin Area. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies, 4(2), 119-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56261/jars.v4i2.169243
Southworth, M. (2005). Designing the walkable city. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 131(4), 246-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
Stanczak, G.C. (2004). Visual representation. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 1471-1476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204266234
Todorova A., Asakawa S., & Aikoh, T. (2003). Preferences for and attitudes towards street flowers and trees in Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2004), 403–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.11.001
Tucker, C., Ostwald, M.J., Chalup, S.K., & Marshall, J. (2005). A method for the visual analysis of the streetscape. 5th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 519–529).
UNESCO. (2020). UNESCO World Heritage Centre—Tentative lists, from Whc.unesco.org. Retrieved June 16, 2020, from https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/state=th
Walsh, D. (2012). Historic townscape characterisation the Lincoln townscape assessment: A case study. The city of Lincoln Council.
Watson, B.G., & Bentley, I. (2007). Identity by design. Elsevier; Oxford.
Willson, G. B. (2016). The spiritual dimension of heritage building. ASEAN Journal on Hospitality and Tourism, 12(2), 107-118. https://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/ajht/article/view/3498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5614/ajht.2013.12.2.03
Worpole, K. (2007). The social value of public space. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/2050-public-space-community.pdf
Yatmo, Y.A. (2008). Street vendors as “Out of Place” urban elements. Journal of Urban Design, 13(3), 387–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802320889
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Building, Urban, Interior and Landscape Technology (BUILT)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
