Assessing the Quality of Third Places in Nakhon Ratchasima Old Town Through the Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)

Authors

  • Apinan Seemuangngam Department of Architecture, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand
  • Nittaya Padkoh Department of Architecture, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand
  • Srivieng Gapphimai Department of Architecture, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand
  • Kanjana Wuttipongpreecha Department of Architecture, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand
  • Supachai Chaijan Department of Architecture, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56261/built.v23.261825

Keywords:

Third Places Evaluation, Analytical Hierarchy Process, Safe Places, Priority Dynamics

Abstract

Third Places foster informal social interaction beyond home and work. Spatial and design features greatly influence how these places function and are perceived. Many characteristics of these places are linked to public spaces; however, simply having numerous public areas does not guarantee that third places meet residents’ needs. Nakhon Ratchasima Old Town demonstrates this issue. Many public areas look attractive but are socially disconnected and underused. This study employs the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to assess the Old Town’s Third Places based on eight key factors. Results show that safety, efficiency, and accessibility are the top priorities. Still, the rankings differ among professionals, suggesting that practical improvements should address the diverse needs and traits of residents, rather than focusing solely on aesthetic upgrades. By integrating expert judgment with a systematic evaluation, the research provides evidence-based guidance for identifying, ranking, and implementing initiatives that improve social functionality, increase community engagement, and preserve the livability of the historic town center. The findings emphasize that successful revitalization depends on social value driving design decisions, ensuring public spaces serve as proper third places rather than mere visual features.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banwell, K., & Kingham, S. (2023). Living well in your local neighbourhood: The value of bumping and gathering places. Wellbeing, Space and Society, 4(December 2022), 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2022.100124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2022.100124

Bosman, C., & Dolley, J. (2019). Rethinking third places and community building. Rethinking Third Places: Informal Public Spaces and Community Building, October, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433916.00009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433916.00009

Boussaa, D., & Madandola, M. (2024). Cultural heritage tourism and urban regeneration: The case of Fez Medina in Morocco. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 13(6), 1228–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2024.04.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2024.04.008

Cabras, I., & Mount, M. P. (2017). How third places foster and shape community cohesion, economic development and social capital: The case of pubs in rural Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies, 55, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.013

Cilliers, E. J. (2019). Planning for third places through evidence-based urban development. In Rethinking Third Places (Issue March, pp. 73–94). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433916.00013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433916.00013

Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., Owusu, E. K., Pärn, E., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(5), 436–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452098

Dudek, J. (2019). The influence of “third Places” on the quality of the public domain. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 603(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/603/3/032009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/603/3/032009

Goosen, Z., & Cilliers, E. J. (2018). Third places for social sustainability : A planning framework based on local and international Comparisons. International Journal of Urban and Civil Engineering, 12(3), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1315983

Goosen, Z., & Cilliers, E. J. (2020). Enhancing social sustainability through the planning of third places: A Theory-based framework. In Social Indicators Research (Vol. 150, Issue 3). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02350-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02350-7

Hussein, N. (2018). The Pedestrianisation and its relation with enhancing walkability in urban spaces. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 2(1), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.3666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.3666

Joshi, U., & Nagarsheth, S. (2024). Analysing the role of the perceptual dimension in the formation of the urban third place. Enquiry, 21(2), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.17831/enqarcc.v21i2.1233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17831/enqarcc.v21i2.1233

Joshi, U. V., & Nagarsheth, S. (2024). People, places, and perceptions: Assessing spatial quality attributes of urban third-place with projective survey. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 8(2), 509–528. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2024.v8n2-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2024.v8n2-13

Malczewski, J., & Rinner, C. (2015). Multicriteria decision analysis in geographic information science. In Analysis methods (Issue Massam 1993). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74757-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74757-4_4

Marinos, C., Bourdin, S., & Baudelle, G. (2025). The new geography of “third places” in France: Explaining a deconcentration process outside metro areas. Applied Geography, 175(January). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103493

Mehta, V., & Bosson, J. K. (2010). Third places and the social life of streets. Environment and Behavior, 42(6), 779–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509344677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509344677

Nasehi, H., Saberi, H., Ghaedrahmati, S., & Khademolhoosini, A. (2023). Social sustainability and urban third places: The case of the city of Isfahan in Iran. GeoJournal, 88(5), 4873–4885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-023-10839-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-023-10839-0

Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Da Capo Press.

Oppio, A., Bottero, M., & Arcidiacono, A. (2022). Assessing urban quality: A proposal for a MCDA evaluation framework. Annals of Operations Research, 312(2), 1427–1444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2738-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2738-2

Pettersen, G. R., Nordbø, E. C. A., Skipstein, A., & Ihlebæk, C. (2024). Shopping centres as third places: Sociodemographic differences in use of shopping centres and non-shopping motivations for visits. Cities, 153(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105268

Ptak-Wojciechowska, A. (2024). Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to assess the urban quality of life of seniors in terms of architectural and urban planning aspects. Architectus, 4(4(80)). https://doi.org/10.37190/arc240409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37190/arc240409

Rezaei, A., & Tahsili, S. (2018). Urban Vulnerability Assessment Using AHP. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2018601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2018601

Rosenbaum, M. S. (2006). Exploring the social supportive role of third places in consumers’ lives. Journal of Service Research, 9(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670506289530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670506289530

Saaty, T. L. (2002). Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Scientia Iranica, 9(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijssci.2008.017590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

Saaty, T., & Vargas, L. (2012). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process (International Series in Operations Research & Management Science Vol. 175). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6

Saravisutra, A. (2016). Multi-criteria decision making : Comparison between SAW , AHP and TOPSIS Concept and Methods. Princess of Naradhiwas University Journal, 8(2), 180–192.

Seemuangngam, A., & Lin, H.-L. (2024). The impact of urbanization on urban flood risk of Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. Applied Geography, 162(1), 103152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103152

Sheikhbaglou, O., & Xi, W. B. (2021). Explanation the role of third-places in the socialization of urban districts. Inernational Journal of Urabn Management Energy Sustainability, 2(4), 23–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22034/jumes.2021.249507

Yıldız, S., Kıvrak, S., Gültekin, A. B., & Arslan, G. (2020). Built environment design - social sustainability relation in urban renewal. Sustainable Cities and Society, 60(July 2019), 102173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102173

Yuen, F., & Johnson, A. J. (2017). Leisure Spaces, Community, and Third Places. Leisure Sciences, 39(3), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2016.1165638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2016.1165638

Yunitsyna, A., & Shtepani, E. (2023). Investigating the socio-spatial relations of the built environment using the Space Syntax analysis – A case study of Tirana City. Cities, 133(December 2022), 104147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104147

Zarie, E., Sepehri, B., Adibhesami, M. A., Pourjafar, M. R., & Karimi, H. (2024). A strategy for giving urban public green spaces a third dimension: A case study of Qasrodasht, Shiraz. Nature-Based Solutions, 5(June 2023), 100102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100102

Zhang, Q., Lu, L., Huang, J., & Zhang, X. (2022). Uneven development and tourism gentrification in the metropolitan fringe: A case study of Wuzhen Xizha in Zhejiang Province, China. Cities, 121(September 2021), 103476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103476

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Seemuangngam, A., Padkoh, N., Gapphimai, S. ., Wuttipongpreecha, K., & Chaijan, S. (2025). Assessing the Quality of Third Places in Nakhon Ratchasima Old Town Through the Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp). International Journal of Building, Urban, Interior and Landscape Technology, 23(2), Research Article 261825. https://doi.org/10.56261/built.v23.261825

Issue

Section

Research Article