Influence of setting time and compressive strength for coal bottom ash as partial cement replacement in mortar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Environmental degradation from forestry practices to extract limestone from mountains, as well as subsequent calcination in cement factories and dumping of coal bottom ash (CBA) waste from thermal power plants, are among the wastes from industry. However, it is essential for the construction industry to look for sustainable solutions to mitigate the negative impact on the environment. In order to promote an environmentally friendly and sustainable ecosystem, the use of recycled CBA waste as a partial substitute for cement in the manufacturing process has significant potential to mitigate the environmental damage caused by the two distinct sectors of cement and waste management. A series of six mortar preparations were prepared, each containing varying percentages of CBA as a partial substitute for cement. The percentages used ranged from 0% to 50% by weight of cement. The time tests were performed on freshly prepared pastes. All samples were cured with water until the respective test time was reached. The experiment included the evaluation of the compressive strength of hardened mortar cubes at three different time intervals: 7, 14 and 28 days. The findings of the study demonstrate that the incorporation of CBA as a partial substitute for cement affects both the setting time and the compressive strength of the mortar. It has been shown that the use of up to 20% CBA as a cement replacement effectively increases the compressive strength of the mortar. Conclusively, the successful use of CBA as a partial substitute for cement in the manufacture of mortar has the potential to reduce the amount of cement consumed, eliminate the need for landfill space for waste disposal, and contribute to the production of a more sustainable environment, thereby promoting a better lifestyle for the surrounding population.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2019 MIJEEC - Maejo International Journal of Energy and Environmental Communication, All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License
References
Abdulmatin, A., Tangchirapat, W., & Jaturapitakkul, C. (2018). An investigation of bottom ash as a pozzolanic material. Construction and Building Materials, 186, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.101
Al-Rifaie, W., Alawaneh, A., Al-Bajawi, M., & Ahmed, W. (2018). Effect of nano silica on compressive strength of concrete. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 52170, V012T11A044.
Al Biajawi, M. I., Embong, R., Muthusamy, K., & Mohamad, N. (2023a). Effect of fly ash and coal bottom ash as alternative materials in the production of self compacting concrete: A review. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2688(1).
Al Biajawi, M. I., Embong, R., & Tayeh, B. A. (2023b). A review of the role of glass waste on the fresh and mechanical properties of concrete as an environmentally friendly materials. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 8(11), 283.
Al Biajawi, M. I., & Embong, R. (2023). The Impact of Varying Ratios of Water-to-Cement Content on the Fresh and Strength Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete. Construction Technologies and Architecture, 4, 69-80.
American Society for Testing and Materials. (2019). ASTM C618-19, Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, C, 5. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0618-19.
Argiz, C., Sanjuán, M. Á., & Menéndez, E. (2017). Coal bottom ash for portland cement production. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2017.
Asmara, Y. P. (2023). Concrete reinforcement degradation and rehabilitation: Damages, Corrosion and Prevention. Springer, 7-24.
Adams, T. H. (2020). Fly ash use in concrete increases slightly as overall coal ash recycling rate declines. https://www. acaa-usa. org.
ASTM, S. (2008). 191-08. Standard test methods for time of setting of hydraulic cement by vicat needle. ASTM International : West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
Aydin, E. (2016). Novel coal bottom ash waste composites for sustainable construction. Construction and Building Materials, 124, 582-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.142.
Biernacki, J. J., Bullard, J. W., Sant, G., Brown, K., Glasser, F. P., Jones, S., Ley, T., Livingston, R., Nicoleau, L., & Olek, J. (2017). Cements in the 21st century: Challenges, perspectives, and opportunities. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 100(7), 2746-2773.
C150: Standard Specification for Portland Cement (2017). Annual Book of ASTM Standards.
Canpolat, F., Yilmaz, K., Köse, M. M., Sümer, M., & Yurdusev, M. A. (2004). Use of zeolite, coal bottom ash and fly ash as replacement materials in cement production. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(5), 731-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00063-2.
Embong, R. B. (2019). Pozzolanic and strength properties of mortar containing chemically pre-treated coal bottom ash. In Doctor of Philosophy. Faculty of Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Malaysia.
Embong, R., Kusbiantoro, A., Abd Wahab, A., & Muthusamy, K. (2021a). Soluble pozzolanic materials from coal bottom ash as cement replacement material. Key Engineering Materials, 879, 68-80.
Embong, R., Kusbiantoro, A., Muthusamy, K., & Ismail, N. (2021b). Recycling of coal bottom ash (CBA) as cement and aggregate replacement material: a review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 682(1), 12035.
Ghazali, N., Muthusamy, K., Embong, R., Rahim, I. S. A., Razali, N. F. M., Yahaya, F. M., Ariffin, N. F., & Ahmad, S. W. (2021). Effect of fly ash as partial cement replacement on workability and compressive strength of palm oil clinker lightweight concrete. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 682(1), 12038.
Hammond, G. P., & Jones, C. I. (2008). Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy, 161(2), 87-98.
Hossain, M. U., Cai, R., Ng, S. T., Xuan, D., & Ye, H. (2021). Sustainable natural pozzolana concrete-A comparative study on its environmental performance against concretes with other industrial by-products. Construction and Building Materials, 270, 121429.
Hossain, M. U., Poon, C. S., Lo, I. M. C., & Cheng, J. C. P. (2017). Comparative LCA on using waste materials in the cement industry: A Hong Kong case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 199-208.
Khan, R. A., & Ganesh, A. (2016). The effect of coal bottom ash (CBA) on mechanical and durability characteristics of concrete. Journal of Building Materials and Structures, 3(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.242470
Kusbiantoro, A., Embong, R., & Abd Aziz, A. (2018). Strength and microstructural properties of mortar containing soluble silica from sugarcane bagasse ash. Key Engineering Materials, 765, 269-274.
Kusbiantoro, A., Embong, R., & Shafiq, N. (2017). Adaptation of eco-friendly approach in the production of soluble pozzolanic material. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 12(2), 246-253.
Kusbiantoro, A., Hanani, A., & Embong, R. (2019). Pozzolanic reactivity of coal bottom ash after chemically pre-treated with sulfuric acid: Materials Science Forum, MSF, 212-216. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.947.212.
Mangi, S. A., Wan Ibrahim, M. H., Jamaluddin, N., Arshad, M. F., Memon, S. A., & Shahidan, S. (2019). Effects of grinding process on the properties of the coal bottom ash and cement paste. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 51(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2019.51.1.1
Mansour, A. M., & Al Biajawi, M. I. (2022). The effect of the addition of metakaolin on the fresh and hardened properties of blended cement products: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings.
Muthusamy, K., Embong, R., Mohamad, N., Kamarul Bahrin, N. S. H., & Yahaya, F. M. (2021). Setting time and compressive strength of mortar containing cockle shell powder as partial cement replacement. Key Engineering Materials, 879, 62-67.
Oruji, S., Brake, N. A., Nalluri, L., & Guduru, R. K. (2017). Strength activity and microstructure of blended ultra-fine coal bottom ash-cement mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 153, 317-326.
Rafieizonooz, M., Mirza, J., Salim, M. R., Hussin, M. W., & Khankhaje, E. (2016). Investigation of coal bottom ash and fly ash in concrete as replacement for sand and cement. Construction and Building Materials, 116, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.080
Ruether, J. A., Ramezan, M., & Balash, P. C. (2004). Greenhouse gas emissions from coal gasification power generation systems. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 10(3), 111-119.
Standard, A. (2013). C109/C109M-07, 2007 Standard test method for compressive strength of concrete cube specimens. Annual book of ASTM standrd. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 04-01, 4-8.
Tanash, A. O. A. A. L. R., & Muthusamy, K. (2022). Concrete Industry, Environment Issue, and Green Concrete: A Review. Construction, 2(1), 1-9.
Tayebani, B., Said, A., & Memari, A. (2023). Less carbon producing sustainable concrete from environmental and performance perspectives: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 404, 133234.
Tenaga, S. (2014). Malaysia Electricity Supply & Voltage.
Townsend, T. G., & Anshassi, M. (2023). Construction materials and their properties: Construction and Demolition Debris. Springer, 29-71.