A Multi-Methodological Approach to Evaluating the Biological Activity of Erythropoietin Marketed in Thailand
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
This study evaluated and validated two analytical methods, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a cell-based bioassay, for the determination of erythropoietin in pharmaceutical formulations marketed in Thailand. Method validation was carried out following ICH guidelines. The ELISA method demonstrated high specificity, as the erythropoietin standard and formulated samples produced clear absorbance signals that were clearly different from those of the excipient matrix. The excipients alone showed minimal response, confirming that formulation components did not interfere with the assay. A strong relationship between absorbance and erythropoietin concentration was observed, and the method showed excellent linearity over the tested range, with coefficients of determination greater than 0.99 across three consecutive days. Accuracy results were acceptable for a biological assay, with recovery values within the expected range. Although some variability was observed in repeatability testing, this was consistent with the nature of immunoassays. Intermediate precision results were consistent across different days and analysts, indicating that the ELISA method is reliable for routine analysis. The cell-based bioassay also showed good specificity. Parallel dilution curves of the erythropoietin standard and sample demonstrated consistent relationships between response and concentration, while formulation excipients produced only weak signals. The assay was linear over a concentration range of 0.0625 to 1 IU/mL, with strong correlations observed over three days. Accuracy testing showed recovery values within acceptable limits, and precision results were within the expected range for cell-based assays, where higher variability is commonly observed. The precision of the assay across different days and analysts confirmed its robustness. In conclusion, both the ELISA and cell-based bioassay methods were successfully validated and shown to be suitable for erythropoietin determination. The ELISA method provides reliable quantitative measurement, while the cell-based assay effectively assesses biological activity and potency. Together, these complementary methods offer a practical and reliable approach for routine quality control of erythropoietin products.
Article Details

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ข้อความภายในบทความที่ตีพิมพ์ในวารสารทั้งหมด รวมถึงรูปภาพประกอบ ตาราง เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของมหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลรัตนโกสินทร์ การนำเนื้อหา ข้อความหรือข้อคิดเห็น รูปภาพ ตาราง ของบทความไปจัดพิมพ์เผยแพร่ในรูปแบบต่าง ๆ เพื่อใช้ประโยชน์ในเชิงพาณิชย์ ต้องได้รับอนุญาตจากกองบรรณาธิการวารสารอย่างเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษร
มหาวิทยาลัยฯ อนุญาตให้สามารถนำไฟล์บทความไปใช้ประโยชน์และเผยแพร่ต่อได้ โดยต้องแสดงที่มาจากวารสารและไม่ใช้เพื่อการค้า
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความในวารสารเป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับราชวิทยาลัยจุฬาภรณ์ และบุคลากร คณาจารย์ท่านอื่น ๆ ในมหาวิทยาลัยฯแต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใด ๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเอง ตลอดจนความรับผิดชอบด้านเนื้อหาและการตรวจร่างบทความเป็นของผู้เขียน ไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับกองบรรณาธิการ
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Lin, F. K., Suggs, S., Lin, C. H., Browne, J. K., Smalling, R., Egrie, J. C., Chen, K. K., Fox, G. M., Martin, F., & Stabinsky, Z. (1985). Cloning and expression of the human erythropoietin gene. proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of America, 82(22): 7580-7584. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.22.7580
Murakami, M., Kiuchi, T., Nishihara, M., Tezuka, K., Okamoto, R., Izumi, M., & Kajihara, Y. (2016). Chemical synthesis of erythropoietin glycoforms for insights into the relationship between glycosylation pattern and bioactivity. Science Advances, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500678
Nascimento, M. C., Abreu, C. L., Costa, R. N., Delgado, W. C., & Fernandes, I. (2015). Potency evaluation of recombinant human erythropoietin in brazil: assessment of reproducibility using a practical approach. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 58(4), 562-568. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-8913201500228
Barth, T., Abreu, C. L., Albani, S. M. V., Dalmora, S. L., & Schwingel, I. C. (2008). Validation of the normocythemic mice bioassay for the potency evaluation of recombinant human erythropoietin in pharmaceutical formulations. Journal of AOAC International, 91(2), 285-291. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/91.2.285
Rey, G., Schuetz, F., Schroeder, D., Kaluschke, C., Wendeler, M. W., Hofmann, I., Dumbliauskas, E., & Obrdlik, P. (2024). Automated ELISA for potency measurements of therapeutic antibodies and antibody fragments. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 245, 116141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116141
Hendriksen, C. F. M. (2002). Refinement, reduction, and replacement of animal use for regulatory testing: Current best scientific practices for the evaluation of safety and potency of biologicals. ILAR Journal, 43(Suppl. 1), S43–S48. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.43.Suppl_1.S43
Noé, G., Riedel, W., Kubanek, B., & Rich, I. N. (1992). A sensitive sandwich elisa for measuring erythropoietin in human serum. British Journal of Haematology, 80(3), 285-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.1992.tb08134.x
Okano, M., Suga, H., Masuda, S., Nagao, M., Narita, H., Ikura, K., & Sasaki, R. (1993). Characterization of erythropoietin isolated from rat serum: biochemical comparison of rat and human erythropoietins. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 57(11), 1882-1885. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.57.1882
Kitamura, T., Tange, T., Terasawa, T., Chiba, S., Kuwaki, T., Miyagawa, K., Piao, Y.-F., Miyazono, K., Urabe, A., & Takaku, F. (1989). Establishment and characterization of a unique human cell line that proliferates dependently on GM-CSF, IL-3, or erythropoietin. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 140(2), 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041400219
Suresh, S., Rajvanshi, P. K., & Noguchi, C. T. (2020). The many facets of erythropoietin physiologic and metabolic response. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, 1534. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01534
Ramos, A. S., Schmidt, C. A., Andrade, S. S., Fronza, M., Rafferty, B., & Dalmora, S. L. (2003). Biological evaluation of recombinant human erythropoietin in pharmaceutical products. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 36(11), 1561-1569. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-879x2003001100014
International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. (2005). Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2(R1). Search at https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q2%28R1%29%20Guideline.pdf
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2009). Guidance for the validation of analytical methodology and calibration of equipment used for testing of illicit drugs in seized materials and biological specimens. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Search at https://www.unodc.org/documents/scientific/validation_E.pdf
Lee, J. W., Devanarayan, V., Chen Barrett, Y., Weiner, R., Allinson, J., Fountain, S., Keller, S., Weinryb, I., Green, M., Duan, L., Rogers, J. A., Millham, R., O'Brien, P. J., Sailstad, J., Khan, M., Ray, C., & Wagner, J. A. (2006). Fit-for-purpose method development and validation for successful biomarker measurement. Pharmaceutical Research, 23(2), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-005-9045-3
Fang, Z., Tao, X., Liu, S., Liu, Q., Zhang, M., Yang, N., Hu, Z., Jin, T., Tsao, E., Yu, P., & Zhu, W. (2026). Validation of the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test for rabies virus neutralizing antibodies — China, 2025. China CDC Weekly, 8(3), 64–70. Search at https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12982118/
Markalunas, E. G., Harold, S. E., Arnold, D. H., Martin, J. C., Edenfield, W. J., & Blenda, A. V. (2025). Comparative analysis of manual elisa and ella, an automated instrument for elisa, in measuring serum galectin-3 levels in breast cancer patient samples. Cancers, 17(19), 3206. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17193206