Development of a Taper Equation for Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) Growing in Western Thailand 10.32526/ennrj/19/2020183

Main Article Content

Thanapol Choochuen
Warong Suksavate
Ponthep Meunpong

Abstract

Teak is an important and valuable tropical hardwood species. In this study, we developed and evaluated suitable taper equations for teak growing in Western Thailand using a formulation of Goodwin cubic polynomial model combined with a bark thickness model. The best taper model calibration was selected based on goodness-of-fit and leave-one-out cross validation statistical testing. In total, 12 different model calibrations were tested, with Thong Pha Phum (TPP) 2 being the most suitable for teak in Western Thailand. The mean prediction error of three validation statistics: (prediction of diameter under bark given height; prediction of height given diameter under bark; and prediction of under bark volume given log length) were within 10% and the overall validation index was 5.454, which was the lowest when compared to other calibrations. A comparison of TPP 2 with a teak taper equation developed for Northern Thailand, using a graphical analysis of the stem shape and bark thickness, indicated that the teak trees growing in the two regions have similar stem shapes, but the trees in Western Thailand tend to have a thicker bark. These results will also help in further work as they indicate that bark thickness equations are particularly important.

Article Details

How to Cite
Choochuen, T., Suksavate, W., & Meunpong, P. (2021). Development of a Taper Equation for Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) Growing in Western Thailand: 10.32526/ennrj/19/2020183. Environment and Natural Resources Journal, 19(3), 176–185. Retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ennrj/article/view/241591
Section
Original Research Articles

References

Beck H, Zimmermann N, McVicar T, Vergopolan N, Berg A, Wood E. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Scientific Data 2018;5:180214.

Brooks J, Jiang L-C, Iii A. Compatible stem taper, volume and weight equations for young longleaf pine plantations in Southwest Georgia. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 2007;31:187-91.

Fonweban J, Gardiner B, Macdonald E, Auty D. Taper functions for scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) in Northern Britain. Forest 2011;84:49-60.

Forest Industry Organization (FIO). Forest Management Optimization Using Farm Forestry Toolbox. Lampang, Thailand: Forest Industry Organization Regional Office; 2013.

Forest Industry Organization (FIO). Thong Pha Phum Forest Plantation Management Summary. Kanchanaburi, Thailand: Thong Pha Phum Forest Plantation Office; 2016.

Forest Industry Organization (FIO). Business Plan 2018. Bangkok, Thailand: Policy Planning and Strategy Bureau; 2018.

Gomat H, Deleporte P, Moukini R, Mialounguila G, Ognouabi N, Saya A, et al. What factors influence the stem taper of Eucalyptus: Growth, environmental conditions, or genetics? Annals of Forest Science 2011;68:109-20.

Goodwin A. A cubic tree taper model. Australian Forestry 2009;72:87-98.

Hansen O, Changtragoon S, Ponoy B, Kjær E, Minn Y, Finkeldey R, et al. Genetic resources of teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.)-strong genetic structure among natural populations. Tree Genetics and Genomes 2014;11:1-16.

Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference and Prediction. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Springer; 2013.

Huang S, Yang Y, Wang Y. A critical look at procedures for validating growth and yield models. In: Amaro A, Reed D, Soares P, editors. Modelling Forest Systems. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing; 2003. p. 271-94.

Kollert W, Kleine M. The Global Teak Study Analysis, Evaluation and Future Potential of Teak Resources. Vienna, Austria: International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO); 2017.

Klos RJ, Wang GC, Dang QL, East EW. Taper equations for five major commercial tree species in Manitoba, Canada. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 2007;22:163-70.

Kozak A, Smith JHG. Standards for evaluating taper estimating systems. Forest Chronicle 1993;69:438-44.

Kozak A, Kozak R. Does cross validation provide additional information in the evaluation of regression models? Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2003;33:976-87.

Kuželka K, Marušák R. Use of nonparametric regression methods for developing a local stem form model. Forest Science 2014;60:464-71.

López-Martínez J, Larreta B, Calderon O, Aguirre-Calderon C, Macario P, Martinez-Salvador M, et al. Compatible taper-volume systems for major tropical species in Mexico. Forestry 2019;93:56-74.

Miguel Sd, Mehtätalo L, Shater Z, Kraid B, Pukkala T. Evaluating marginal and conditional predictions of taper models in the absence of calibration data. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2012;42:1383-94.

Morley T, Little K. Comparison of taper functions between two planted and coppiced eucalypt clonal hybrids, South Africa. New Forests 2012;43:129-41.

Nigh G, Smith W. Effect of climate on lodgepole pine stem taper in British Columbia, Canada. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research 2012;85(5):579-87.

Noda I, Himmapan W. Erratum to “Effects of silvicultural alternatives on model-based financial evaluation of teak (Tectona grandis L.) farm forestry management for small-scale farmers in Northeast Thailand”. Open Journal of Forestry 2014;4:558-69.

Ryan MG, Asao S. Phloem transport in trees. Tree Physiology 2014;34:1-4.

Rosell J. Bark thickness across the angiosperms: More than just fire. New Phytologist 2016;211:90-102.

Sabatia C, Burkhart H. On the use of upper stem diameters to localize a segmented taper equation to new trees. Forest Science 2014;61:411-23.

Sumida A, Miyaura T, Torii H. Relationships of tree height and diameter at breast height revisited: Analyses of stem growth using 20-year data of an even-aged Chamaecyparis obtusa stand. Tree Physiology 2013;33(1):106-18.

Tasissa G, Burkhart H. An application of mixed effects analysis to modeling thinning effects on stem profile of loblolly pine. Forest Ecology and Management 1998;103:87-101.

Thai Meteorological Department. Annual weather summary [Internet]. 2020 [Cited 2020 Mar 5]. Available from: https://www.tmd.go.th/en/climate.php?FileID=5.

Vanclay JK. Optimum Sampling of Sample Trees for Volume Equations. Research Note No. 35. Brisbane, Australia: Department of Forestry; 1982.

Wang Y, Baker T. A regionalised growth model for Eucalyptus globulus plantations in south-eastern Australia. Australian Forestry 2007;70:93-107.

Warner AJ, Jamroenprucksa M, Puangchit L. Development and evaluation of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) taper equations in Northern Thailand. Agriculture and Natural Resources 2016;50:362-7.

Warner AJ, Jamroenprucksa M, Puangchit L. Buttressing impact on diameter estimation in plantation teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) sample trees in Northern Thailand. Agriculture and Natural Resources 2017;51:520-5.

Westfall J, Scott C. Taper models for commercial tree species in the Northeastern United States. Forest Science 2010;56:515-28.

Yang Y, Huang S. Suitability of five cross validation methods for performance evaluation of nonlinear mixed-effects forest models-a case study. Forestry 2014;87(5):654-62.

Zheng C, Wang Y, Jia L, Mason E, We S, Sun C, et al. Compatible taper-volume models of Quercus variabilis Blume forests in North China. iForest 2017;10:567-75