Spatial and Temporal Habitat Use by the Main Prey Species of Tigers in Two Protected Areas of Thailand’s Southern Western Forest Complex 10.32526/ennrj/20/202200046
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Tigers (Panthera tigris) have disappeared from over 90% of their historical range, and extant populations face habitat loss, direct poaching, and prey depletion in otherwise suitable habitats. In Thailand, tiger numbers continue to decline due to prey depletion, yet a few strongholds remain. Recently, tigers have been detected in the Southern Western Forest Complex (sWEFCOM), following intensification of conservation efforts. However, there is still a lack of primary data on the status of tigers and their prey in the sWEFCOM. To fill this knowledge gap, we conducted camera trapping surveys between 2019 and 2020 in Khuean Srinagarindra National Park (KSR) and Salakphra Wildlife Sanctuary (SLP). Located near a tiger source population in Thungyai Naresuan and Huai Kha Khaeng, these areas are potential areas for tiger recovery. In particular, our study assessed the status of prey, a prerequisite to the persistence and recovery of tigers. Based on relative abundance indices, time overlap and occupancy models, we analysed the effect of anthropogenic and ecological factors on the spatial and temporal habitat use of the main prey species. We highlight that anthropogenic factor impacted species-specific habitat relationships. Mainly, shifts in ungulate temporal and spatial habitat use was linked to human activities. These relationships, however, differed between the two protected areas. As tiger recovery depends on prey recovery, we suggest that increased conservation law enforcement and greater engagement with villages within and adjacent to protected areas are essential to minimising unsustainable resource use practices that currently affect prey.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Published articles are under the copyright of the Environment and Natural Resources Journal effective when the article is accepted for publication thus granting Environment and Natural Resources Journal all rights for the work so that both parties may be protected from the consequences of unauthorized use. Partially or totally publication of an article elsewhere is possible only after the consent from the editors.
References
Amorntiyangkul P, Pattanavibool A, Ochakul W, Chinnawong W, Klanprasert S, Aungkeaw C, et al. Dynamic occupancy of wild Asian Elephant: A case study based on the SMART database from the Western Forest Complex in Thailand. Environment and Natural Resources Journal 2022;20(3):310-22.
Arjkumpa O, Suwannaboon M, Boonrod M, Punyawan I, Liangchaisiri S, Laobannue P, et al. The first lumpy skin disease outbreak in Thailand (2021): Epidemiological features and spatio-temporal analysis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2021;8:Article No. 799065.
Carbone C, Christie S, Conforti K, Coulson T, Franklin N, Ginsberg JR, et al. The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals. Animal Conservation 2001;4(1):75-9.
Chaiyarat R, Srikosamatara S. Populations of domesticated cattle and buffalo in the Western Forest Complex of Thailand and their possible impacts on the wildlife community. Journal of Environmental Management 2009;90(3):1448-53.
Chaiyarat R, Sakchan P, Panprayun G, Thongthip N, Nakbun S. Monitoring of forage and nutrition before and after reintroduction of banteng (Bos javanicus d’Alton, 1823) to Salakphra Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Scientific Reports 2020;10(1):Article No. 11135.
Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP). Summary of Forestry Case Reports: Fiscal Year 2019. Bangkok, Thailand: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment; 2019. (in Thai).
Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP). Thailand Tiger Action Plan 2010-2022. Bangkok, Thailand: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment; 2010a.
Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP). Status of Large Mammals in Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment; 2010b.
Duangchantrasiri S, Umponjan M, Simcharoen S, Pattanavibool A, Chaiwattana S, Maneerat S, et al. Dynamics of a low‐density tiger population in Southeast Asia in the context of improved law enforcement. Conservation Biology 2016; 30(3):639-48.
Duangchatrasiri S, Jornburom P, Jinamoy S, Pattanvibool A, Hines JE, Arnold TW, et al. Impact of prey occupancy and other ecological and anthropogenic factors on tiger distribution in Thailand’s Western Forest Complex. Ecology and Evolution 2019;9(5):2449-58.
Emmons LH, Stark NM. Elemental composition of a natural mineral lick in Amazonia. Biotropica 1979;11(4):311-3.
Francis C. Field Guide to the Mammals of South-East Asia. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2019.
Gaillard JM, Brandt S, Jullien JM. Body weight effect on reproduction of young wild boar (Sus scrofa) females: A comparative analysis. Folia Zoologica (Brno) 1993;42(3): 204-12.
Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, Ilyushchenko S, Thau D, Moore R. Google earth engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment 2017;202:18-27.
Harihar A, Chanchani P, Borah J, Crouthers RJ, Darman Y, Gray TN, et al. Recovery planning towards doubling wild tiger Panthera tigris numbers: Detailing 18 recovery sites from across the range. PLoS One 2018;13(11):e0207114.
Hayward MW, O’Brien J, Kerley GI. Carrying capacity of large African predators: Predictions and tests. Biological Conservation 2007;139:219-29.
Johann F, Handschuh M, Linderoth P, Dormann CF, Arnold J. Adaptation of wild boar (Sus scrofa) activity in a human-dominated landscape. BMC Ecology 2020;20(1):1-4.
Jornburom P, Duangchantrasiri S, Jinamoy S, Pattanavibool A, Hines JE, Arnold TW, et al. Habitat use by tiger prey in Thailand’s Western Forest Complex: What will it take to fill a half-full tiger landscape? Journal for Nature Conservation 2020;58:Article No. 125896.
Khoewsree N, Charaspet K, Songsasen N, Pla-Ard M, Thongbantum J, Kongchaloem W, et al. Abundance, prey, and activity period of dholes (Cuon alpinus) in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity 2020;21(1):345-54.
Knight RL, Cole DN. Wildlife and recreationists: Coexistence through management and research. In: Knight RL, Gutzwiller KJ, editers. Wildlife Responses to Recreationists. Washington DC, USA: Island Press; 1995.
Lahkar D, Ahmed MF, Begum RH, Das SK, Harihar A. Responses of a wild ungulate assemblage to anthropogenic influences in Manas National Park, India. Biological Conservation 2020;243:Article No. 108425.
MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Andrew Royle J, Langtimm CA. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 2002; 83(8):2248-55.
McShea WJ, Davies SJ, Bhumpakphan N. The Ecology and Conservation of Seasonally Dry Forests in Asia. Washinton DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press; 2011.
O’Brien TG, Kinnaird MF, Wibisono HT. Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape. Animal Conservation 2003;6(2):131-9.
Ohashi H, Saito M, Horie R, Tsunoda H, Noba H, Ishii H, et al. Differences in the activity pattern of the wild boar Sus scrofa related to human disturbance. European Journal of Wildlife Research 2013;59(2):167-77.
Olliff ERR, Cline CW, Bruen D, Yarmchuk EJ, Pickles RSA, Hunter L. The panthercam-a camera-trap optimized for monitoring wild felids. Wild Felid Monitor 2014;7(2):21-8.
Paansri P, Sangprom N, Suksavate W, Chaiyes A, Duengkae P. Spatial modeling of forage crops for tiger prey species in the area surrounding highway 304 in the Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex. Environment and Natural Resources Journal 2021;19(3):220-9.
Paansri P, Suksavate W, Chaiyes A, Chanteap P, Duengkae P. Use of Bayesian, lasso binary quantile regression to identify suitable habitat for tiger prey species in Thap Lan National Park, Eastern Thailand. Environment and Natural Resources Journal 2022;20(3):266-78.
Pakpien S, Simcharoen A, Duangchantrasiri S, Chimchome V, Pongpattannurak N, Smith JL. Ecological covariates at kill sites influence tiger (Panthera tigris) hunting success in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Tropical Conservation Science 2017;10:1-7.
Panthera. Enabling the Recovery and Conservation of Tiger and Tiger Prey in Southern Western Forest Complex (sWEFCOM): Annual Report 2018. Karnchanaburi, Thailand: Panthera Corporation; 2018.
Pettorelli N, Ryan S, Mueller T, Bunnefeld N, Jedrzejewska B, Lima M, et al. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI): Unforeseen successes in animal ecology. Climate Research 2011;46(1):15-27.
Phoonjampa R, Steinmetz R, Phumanee W, Bunchornratana K, Kaewsrisod T, Srirattanaporn S, et al. Recolonization of former range by endangered banteng Bos javanicus in Mae Wong National Park, Thailand. Tropical Conservation Science 2021;14:1-6.
Phumanee W, Steinmetz R, Phoonjampa R, Bejraburnin T, Grainger M, Savini T. Occupancy‐based monitoring of ungulate prey species in Thailand indicates population stability, but limited recovery. Ecosphere 2020;11(9):e03208.
Phumanee W, Steinmetz R, Phoonjampa R, Weingdow S, Phokamanee S, Bhumpakphan N, et al. Tiger density, movements, and immigration outside of a tiger source site in Thailand. Conservation Science and Practice 2021a;3(12): e560.
Phumanee W, Steinmetz R, Phoonjampa R, Bejraburnin T, Bhumpakphan N, Savini T. Coexistence of large carnivore species in relation to their major prey in Thailand. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2021b;32:e01930.
Prayoon U, Suksavate W, Chaiyes A, Winitpornsawan S, Tunhikorn S, Faengbubpha K, et al. Past, present and future habitat suitable for gaur (Bos gaurus) in Thailand. Agriculture and Natural Resources 2021;55(5):743-56.
Reed DH. Extinction risk in fragmented habitats. Animal Conservation 2004;7(2):181-91.
Ridout MS, Linkie M. Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 2009;14(3):322-37.
Saisamorn A, Duengkae P, Pattanavibool A, Duangchantrasiri S, Simcharoen A, Smith JL. Spatial and temporal analysis of leopards (Panthera pardus), their prey and tigers (Panthera tigris) in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Folia Oecologica 2019;46(2):73-82.
Simcharoen A, Savini T, Gale GA, Roche E, Chimchome V, Smith JL. Ecological factors that influence sambar (Rusa unicolor) distribution and abundance in western Thailand: Implications for tiger conservation. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 2014; 62:100-6.
Simcharoen A, Simcharoen S, Duangchantrasiri S, Bump J, Smith JLD. Tiger and leopard diets in western Thailand: Evidence for overlap and potential consequences. Food Webs 2018;15:e00085.
Spitz F, Janeau G. Daily selection of habitat in wild boar (Sus scrofa). Journal of Zoology 1995;237(3):423-34.
Srikosamatara S, Suteethorn V. Populations of gaur and banteng and their management in Thailand. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 1995;43(1):55-83.
Steinmetz R, Chutipong W, Seuaturien N, Chirngsaard E, Khaengkhetkarn M. Population recovery patterns of Southeast Asian ungulates after poaching. Biological Conservation 2010;143(1):42-51.
Suttidate N, Steinmetz R, Lynam AJ, Sukmasuang R, Ngoprasert D, Chutipong W, et al. Habitat connectivity for endangered Indochinese tigers in Thailand. Global Ecology and Conservation 2021;29:e01718.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). World Heritage list: Thungyai-huai kha khaeng wildlife sanctuaries [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jan 20]. Available from: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/591/.
Vinitpornsawan S, Fuller TK. Spatio-temporal correlations of large predators and their prey in Western Thailand. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 2020;68.118-31.
Western Forest Complex (WEFCOM). GIS Database and Its Applications for Ecosystem Management. Bangkok, Thailand: Department of National Park, Wildlife, and Plant Conservation; 2004.
Widodo FA, Imron MA, Sunarto S, Giordano AJ. Carnivores and their prey in Sumatra: Occupancy and activity in human-dominated forests. PLoS One 2022;17(3):e0265440.
Wolf C, Ripple WJ. Prey depletion as a threat to the world’s large carnivores. Royal Society Open Science 2016;3(8):Article No. 160252.
Wolf C, Ripple WJ. Range contractions of the world’s large carnivores. Royal Society Open Science 2017;4(7):Article No. 170052.