A Combined DPSIR Framework and Logical Framework Approach for Sustainable Water Resources Management in the Lagoon Floodplain 10.32526/ennrj/21/202200170
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article describes a combination of the driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) framework and the logical framework approach (LFA) to develop water management strategies for a lagoon floodplain in Thailand. The DPSIR framework identified the cause-effect relationship between water and anthropogenic activities. LFA developed management strategies based on a systematic and logical approach. DPSIR analysis for the issue of water shortages for irrigated areas revealed the need for income from agriculture is a major driver, as indicated by agricultural development policy. The driver exerted pressure on increasing irrigation water demand, which increased the risk of a water shortage. The impact of water shortage was indicated by loss of farmer income. Existing responses led to inadequate problem-solving, for example, the promotion of mixed farming. Using data captured from DPSIR analysis for LFA analysis, proposed strategies to address the root causes of “ineffective irrigation water allocation” focused on improving (1) the performance of rotating irrigation systems; (2) monitoring water allocation; and (3) water use efficiency. The strategies developed using the combined DPSIR framework and LFA are effective because: (1) this method provides insight into complex water systems; (2) the strategies are developed logically to solve the problem at its root cause; and (3) there is intensive stakeholder participation and in-depth study of the area. This method is a helpful tool for developing a management strategy for a complex water system and is suitable for application by decision-makers. Stakeholder verification is required for future research to ensure that the strategies are appropriate and capable of being implemented.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Published articles are under the copyright of the Environment and Natural Resources Journal effective when the article is accepted for publication thus granting Environment and Natural Resources Journal all rights for the work so that both parties may be protected from the consequences of unauthorized use. Partially or totally publication of an article elsewhere is possible only after the consent from the editors.
References
Agramont A, Cauwenbergh NV, Griesven AV, Craps M. Integrating spatial and social characteristics in the DPSIR framework for the sustainable management of river basins: Case study of the Katari River Basin, Bolivia. Water International 2022;47:8-29.
Apostolaki S, Koundouri P, Pittis N. Using a systemic approach to address the requirement for integrated water resource management within the Water Framework Directive. Science of the Total Environment 2019;679:70-9.
Ashfaq MY, Al-Ghouti MA, Qiblawey H, Zouari N, Rodrigues DF, Hu Y. Use of DPSIR framework to analyze water resources in Qatar and overview of reverse osmosis as an environment friendly technology. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy 2018;38:1-13.
Binh NT, Tien LVT, Tang LT, Tu NM, Dung TD, Quan NH. Resilience of various innovative water management practices: The case of rice production in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta floodplains. Agricultural Water Management 2022;270: Article No. 107739.
Chambers R. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development 1994;22:953-69.
Chen M, Chen F, Tang C, Lu Y, Feng Y. Integration of DPSIR framework and TOPSIS model reveals insight into the coastal zone ecosystem health. Ocean and Coastal Management 2022;226:Article No. 106285.
European Environment Agency (EEA). Environmental Indicators: Typology and Overview: Technical Report No 25. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency; 1999.
Enteshari S, Safavi HR. Development of system dynamics for holistic conceptualization of water resources problems using grounded theory: A case study of the Zayandehrud River Basin. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering 2021;45:413-28.
Gari SR, Newton A, Icely JD. A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social-ecological system. Ocean and Coastal Management 2015;103:63-77.
Gari SR, Guerrero CEO, A-Uribe B, Icely JD, Newton A. A DPSIR-analysis of water uses and related water quality issues in the Colombian Alto and Medio Dagua Community Council. Water Science 2018;32:318-37.
Global Water Partnership. Integrated Water Resources Management: Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Background Paper No. 4. Stockholm, Sweden: Global Water Partnership; 2000.
Hashemi MS, Zare F, Bagheri A, Moridi A. Flood assessment in the context of sustainable development using the DPSIR framework. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy 2014;2:41-9.
Islam M, Braden JB. Bio-economic development of floodplains: Farming versus fishing in Bangladesh. Environment and Development Economics 2006;11:95-126.
Jago-on KAB, Kaneko S, Fujikura R, Fujiwara A, Imai T, Matsumoto T, et al. Urbanization and subsurface environmental issues: An attempt at DPSIR model application in Asian cities. Science of the Total Environment 2009; 407:3089-104.
Kagalou I, Leonardos I, Anastasiadou C, Neofytou C. The DPSIR approach for an integrated river management framework: A preliminary application on a Mediterranean site (Kalamas River-NW Greece). Water Resources Management 2012; 26:1677-92.
López-Juambeltz F, Rodríguez-Gallego L, Dabezíes JM, Chreties C, Narbondo S, Conde D. A GIS-based assessment combined with local ecological knowledge to support the management of Juncus acutus L. spreading in the floodplain of a protected coastal lagoon. Journal for Nature Conservation 2020; 57:Article No. 125891.
Lu M, Wang S, Wang X, Liao W, Wang C, Lei X, et al. An assessment of temporal and spatial dynamics of regional water resources security in the DPSIR framework in Jiangxi Province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19:Article No. 3650.
Malmir M, Javadi S, Moridi A, Neshat A, Razdar B. A new combined framework for sustainable development using the DPSIR approach and numerical modeling. Geoscience Frontiers 2021;12:Article No. 101169.
Maxim L, Spangenberg JH, O’Connor M. An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework. Ecological Economics 2009;69:12-23.
Musiyarira HK, Pillalamarry M, Tesh D, Nikowa N. Formulating strategic interventions for the coloured gemstone industry in Namibia by utilising the logical framework approach.The Extractive Industries and Society 2019;6:1017-29.
National Economic and Social Development Board. The Second National Economic and Social Development Plan (1967-1971). Bangkok, Thailand: Office of the Prime Minister; 1967.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews: Environmental Monograph. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 1993.
Reddy K, Reddy LN, Nagothu S, Nakka SBR. Sensors for water monitoring for improved on farm water management. Proceedings of the 2nd World Irrigation Forum (WIF2); 2016 Nov 6-8; Chiang Mai International Convention and Exhibition Center, Chiang Mai: Thailand; 2016.
Regional Irrigation Office 16. Ranod-Krasasin Operation and Maintenance of Irrigation Project. Songkhla, Thailand: Royal Irrigation Department; 2011.
Republic of Serbia Government European Integration Office. Guide to Logical Framework Approach. Belgrade, Republic of Serbia: Global Print; 2011.
Rey D, Pérez-Blanco CD, Escriva-Bou A, Girard C, Veldkamp TIE. Role of economic instruments in water allocation reform: Lessons from Europe. International Journal of Water Resources Development 2019;35:206-39.
Roy K, Gain AK, Mallick B, Vogt J. Social, hydro-ecological and climatic change in the southwest coastal region of Bangladesh. Regional Environmental Change 2017;17:1895-906.
Royal Irrigation Department (RID). Sathing Phra Peninsula Flood Alleviation Study Project: Final Report. Bangkok, Thailand: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives; 2012.
Songkhla Provincial Agriculture and Cooperatives Office. Agricultural Information of Songkhla Province in 2019. Songkhla, Thailand: Department of Agricultural Extension; 2020.
Songkhla Provincial Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Office. Statistics of disasters for the year 2015 [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Jan 10]. Available from: https://kb.psu.ac.th/psukb/ handle/2016/13642.
Songkhla Provincial Agriculture and Cooperatives Office. Basic information of important agricultural products of Songkhla province (rice): Under the BCG Model for agriculture in Songkhla Province for 2022 [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.opsmoac.go.th/songkhla-dwl-preview-441291791020.
Teamsuwan V, Satho M. Comparative analysis of management of three water users’ organizations: Successful cases in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand. Paddy and Water Environment 2009;7:227-37.
Teodosiu C, Ardeleanu C, Lupu L. An overview of decision support systems for integrated water resources management. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 2009;8:153-62.
The World Bank. The Logframe Handbook: A Logical Framework Approach to Project Cycle Management. Washington DC, USA: The World Bank; 2000.
Tscherning K, Helming K, Krippner B, Sieber S, Paloma SG. Does research applying the DPSIR framework support decision making? Land Use Policy 2012;29:102-10.
Uprety M, Orchoa-Tocachi B, Paul JD, Regmi S, Buytaert W. Improving water resources management using participatory monitoring in a remote mountainous region of Nepal. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 2019;23:Article No. 100604.
Wang W, Sun Y, Wu J. Environmental warning system based on the DPSIR model: A practical and concise method for environmental assessment. Sustainability 2018;10:Article No. 1728.
Zare F, Elsawah S, Bagheri A, Nabavi E, Jakeman AJ. Improved integrated water resource modeling by combining DPSIR and system dynamics conceptual modeling techniques. Journal of Environmental Management 2019;246:27-41.