Do Managed Hill Sal (Shorea robusta) Community Forests of Nepal Sequester and Conserve More Carbon than Unmanaged Ones? 10.32526/ennrj/21/202200259
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Nepalese community forests are globally recognized for sustainable forest management and improving the livelihoods of forest-dependent communities, but their contribution to carbon sequestration in trees and soil is rarely studied. This study was performed to understand the effect of management practices on carbon stock of two community forests (CFs) - Taldanda (managed) and Dangdunge (unmanaged) - dominated by Sal (Shorea robusta) in the mid-hills of Nepal. Twenty-one concentric sample plots, each of 250 m2, were laid out in each forest to estimate different carbon pools and a stratified random sampling intensity of 0.5% used to collect data. Results showed significant (p<0.05) differences in above and below-ground biomass and carbon sequestration potential between the two CFs. The managed and unmanaged forests had total carbon stock of 269.3±27.4 and 150.0±22.7 ton/ha, respectively, demonstrating 1.79 times higher carbon stock in the former than the latter. The managed forest had significantly (p<0.05) greater mean soil organic carbon (SOC) stock than the unmanaged forest. The SOC was highest in the upper soil layer (0-10 cm), with a steady decrease as the soil depth increased. All other measured carbon pools values were higher in managed compared to unmanaged forest. The difference in carbon stock was due to the manipulation of different forest management activities, including thinning, timber extraction, fire control, grazing, and fuel wood/fodder extraction. The study suggests that the implementation of proper forest management would be necessary for enhancing carbon stock in forest trees and soils.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Published articles are under the copyright of the Environment and Natural Resources Journal effective when the article is accepted for publication thus granting Environment and Natural Resources Journal all rights for the work so that both parties may be protected from the consequences of unauthorized use. Partially or totally publication of an article elsewhere is possible only after the consent from the editors.
References
Acharya KP, Tamrakar PR, Gautam G, Regmi R, Adhikari A, Acharya B. Managing tropical Sal Forests (Shorea robusta) in Nepal in short rotations: Findings of a 12-year long research. Banko Janakari 2002;12(1):71-5.
Ali A, Ashraf MI, Gulzar S, Akmal M, Ahmad B. Estimation of soil carbon pools in the forests of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan. Journal of Forestry Research 2019; 31(6):2313-21.
Alidoust E, Afyuni M, Hajabbasi MA, Mosaddeghi MR. Soil carbon sequestration potential as affected by soil physical and climatic factors under different land uses in a semiarid region. Catena 2018;171:62-71.
Amir M, Liu X, Ahmad A, Saeed S, Mannan A, Muneer MA. Patterns of biomass and carbon allocation across chronosequence of chir pine (Pinus roxburghii) forest in Pakistan: Inventory-based estimate. Advances in Meteorology 2018;2018:Article No. 3095891.
Arnold H. Biotic and abiotic factors that affecting forest ecosystem. Journal of Forest Research 2022;11:Article No. 325.
Asia Network for Sustainable Agriculture and Bio-resources (ANSAB). Forest Carbon Stock Measurement: Guidelines for Measuring Carbon Stocks in Community-Managed Forests. Kathmandu, Nepal: Asia Network for Sustainable Agriculture and Bio-resources (ANSAB), Federation of Community Forest User Groups and International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development; 2010.
Bajracharya RM, Lal R, Kimble JM. Soil organic carbon distribution in aggregates and primary particle fractions as influenced by erosion phases and landscape position. In: Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle. CRC Press; 2018. p. 353-67.
Bastienne CS, Pablo JD. Effects of forest type and stand structure on coarse woody debris in old-growth rainforests in the Valdivian Andes, south-central Chile. Forest Ecology and Management 2008;255(5-6):1906-14.
Batjes NH. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science 2014;65(1):10-21.
Bengtsson J, Nilsson SG, Franc A, Menozzi P. Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests. Forest Ecology and Management 2000; 132(1):39-50.
Bhatta S, Poudel A, Kc YB. A comparative study of carbon stocks in the Sal Forest (Shorea robusta) in core and buffer zones of Shuklaphanta National Park, Nepal. Forestry: Journal of Institute of Forestry, Nepal 2021;18(1):52-60.
Bhattarai TP, Skutsch M, Midmore DJ, Rana EB. The carbon sequestration potential of community-based forest management in Nepal. International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses 2012;3(2):233-53.
Bohara B, Miya MS, Timilsina S, Gautam D, Regmi S. Biomass and carbon stock variation along slopes in tropical forest of Nepal: A case of Depard Community Forest, Makwanpur, Nepal. Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Natural Science 2021;1(2):89-99.
Chaichi MR, Saravi MM, Malekian AR. Effects of livestock trampling on soil physical properties and vegetation cover (Case study: Lar Rangeland, Iran). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2005;7:904-8.
Chavan BL, Rasal GB. Comparative status of carbon dioxide sequestration in Albizia lebbek and Delonix regia. Universal Journal of Environmental Research and Technology 2012; 2(1):85-92.
Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, et al. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 2005; 145(1):87-99.
Chhatre A, Agrawal A. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009; 106(42):17667-70.
Commarmot B, Bachofen H, Bundziak Y, Bürgi A, Ramp B, Shparyk Y, et al. Structures of virgin and managed beech forests in Uholka (Ukraine) and Sihlwald (Switzerland): A comparative study. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 2005;79(1/2):45-56.
Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JH, Amatangelo K, Dorrepaal E, Eviner VT, Godoy O, et al. Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecological Letters 2008;11(10):1065-71.
Department of Forest (DoF). Community Forest Inventory Guideline. Kathmandu, Nepal: DoF; 2004.
Department of Forest Research and Survey (DFRS). State of Nepal’s Forests: Forest Resource Assessment (FRA) Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: DFRS; 2015.
Dhakal A, Maraseni TN, Timsina J. Assessing the potential of agroforestry in Nepal: Socio-economic and environmental perspectives. In: Agriculture, Natural Resources and Food Security. Springer Cham; 2022. p. 375-94.
Di Cosmo L, Gasparini P, Floris A. Forest carbon stock. In: Italian National Forest Inventory: Methods and Results of the Third Survey. Springer Cham; 2022. p. 503-43.
Dunne T, Western D, Dietrich WE. Effects of cattle trampling on vegetation, infiltration, and erosion in a tropical rangeland. Journal of Arid Environments 2011;75(1):58-69.
Forest Research and Training Centre (FRTC). National Land Cover Monitoring System of Nepal. Babarmahal, Kathmandu, Nepal: Forest Research and Training Centre, Government of Nepal; 2022.
Government of Nepal (GoN). Economic survey. Singh Durbar, Kathmandu [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 8]. Available from: https://www.mof.gov.np/site/publication-detail/3170.
He WM, Shen Y, Cornelissen JHC. Soil nutrient patchiness and plant genotypes interact on the production potential and decomposition of root and shoot litter: Evidence from short-term laboratory experiments with Triticum aestivum. Plant and Soil 2012;353(1):145-54.
Hou G, Delang CO, Lu X, Gao L. Soil organic carbon storage varies with stand ages and soil depths following afforestation. Annals of Forest Research 2019;62(2):3-20.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry. Kanagawa, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, IPCC; 2003.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, (Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use). Hayanma, Japan: Institute of for Global Environmental Strategies, IPCC; 2006.
Jana BK, Biswas S, Majumder M, Roy PK, Mazumdar A. Carbon sequestration rate and aboveground biomass carbon potential of four young species. Journal of Ecology and Natural Environment 2009;1(2):15-24.
Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritz R, Hagedorn F, et al. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 2007;137(3-4):253-68.
Jati R. Comparative Study of Carbon Assessment: A Study on Carbon Stock in Kumvakarna Conservation Community Forest [dissertation]. Department of Environmental Science, Khwopa College, Tribhuwan University; 2012.
Jina BS, Sah P, Bhatt MD, Rawat YS. Estimating carbon sequestration rates and total carbon stockpile in degraded and non-degraded sites of Oak and Pine Forest of Kumaun Central Himalaya. Ecoprint: An International Journal of Ecology 2008;15:75-81.
Jindal R, Swallow B, Kerr J. Forestry‐based carbon sequestration projects in Africa: Potential benefits and challenges. In: Natural Resources Forum. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2008.
Joshi R, Singh H, Chhetri R, Poudel SR, Rijal S. Carbon sequestration potential of community forests: A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock in community managed forests of Far-Western Nepal. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 2021;10(2):96-104.
Joshi R, Singh H, Chhetri R, Yadav K. Assessment of carbon sequestration potential in degraded and non-Degraded community forests in Terai Region of Nepal. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science 2020;36(2):113-21.
Kafle G, Timilsina YP, Sharma RP, Rijal ML, Bartaula B, Pokhrel B, et al. Contribution of dead wood and forest soil to carbon sequestration in Parsa National Park, Nepal. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry University 2019;3:113-23.
Kafle G. Carbon sequestration and soil properties in forests of Nepal. Agriculture and Forestry Journal 2020;4(2):91-5.
Kirschbaum MU. To sink or burn? A discussion of the potential contributions of forests to greenhouse gas balances through storing carbon or providing biofuels. Biomass and Bioenergy 2003;24(4-5):297-310.
Kuuluvainen T, Penttinen A, Leinonen K, Nygren M. Statistical opportunities for comparing stand structural heterogeneity in managed and primeval forests: An example from boreal spruce forest in southern Finland. Silva Fennica 1996;30(2-3):315-28.
Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 2004;123(1-2):1-22.
MacDicken KG. A Guide to Monitoring Carbon Storage in Forestry and Agroforestry Projects. USA: Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development; 1997.
Mandal G, Joshi SP. Biomass accumulation and carbon sequestration potential of dry deciduous forests. International Journal of Ecology and Development 2015;30(1):64-82.
Mandal RA, Dutta IC, Jha PK, Karmacharya S. Relationship between carbon stock and plant biodiversity in collaborative forests in Terai, Nepal. International Scholarly Research Notices 2013;2013:Article No. 625767.
Mathema P. Forest Fire and its management strategies in Nepal. Banko Janakari 2016;23(2):1-2.
Nagendra H, Pareeth S, Sharma B, Schweik CM, Adhikari KR. Forest fragmentation and regrowth in an institutional mosaic of community, government and private ownership in Nepal. Landscape Ecology 2008;23(1):41-54.
Ojha H, Paudel NS, Timsina J, Chaudhary S, Baral H. Ecosystems services from community forestry: Prospects and challenges for improving local livelihoods in Nepal. In: Timsina J, Maraseni TN, Gauchan D, Adhikari J, Ojha H, editors. Agriculture, Natural Resources and Food Security. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer Cham; 2022. p. 337-56.
Okland T, Rydgren K, Okland RH, Storaunet KO, Rolstad J. Variation in environmental conditions, understorey species number, abundance and composition among natural and managed Picea abies forest stands. Forest Ecology and Management 2003;177(1-3):17-37.
Pandey SS, Maraseni TN, Cockfield G. Carbon stock dynamics in different vegetation dominated community forests under REDD+: A case from Nepal. Forest Ecology and Management 2014;327:40-7.
Pearson TR, Brown S, Ravindranath NH. Integrating Carbon Benefit Estimates into GEF Projects: Guidelines. New York, USA: Global Environment Facility, United Nations Development Programme; 2005.
Pearson TR. Measurement Guidelines for the Sequestration of Forest Carbon. USA: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; 2007.
Prasad M, Chaudhary M, Srinivasan R. Role of fodder production systems to improve carbon sequestration and environmental sustainability. Global Journal of Bioscience and Biotechnology 2018;7(1):81-7.
Selin NE. Carbon sequestration. Encyclopedia Britannica [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Feb 8]. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/technology/carbon-sequestration.
Sharma CM, Gairola S, Baduni NP, Ghildiyal SK, Suyal, S. Variation in carbon stocks on different slope aspects in seven major forest types of temperate region of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Journal of Biosciences 2011;36(4):701-8.
Shrestha BM, Singh BR. Soil and vegetation carbon pools in a mountainous watershed of Nepal. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 2008;81(2):179-91.
Singh AK, Kumar VK, Singh J. Forest Resource, Economy, and Environment. Nepal: Concept Publishing Company; 1987.
Solomon N, Birhane E, Tadesse T, Treydte AC, Meles K. Carbon stocks and sequestration potential of dry forests under community management in Tigray, Ethiopia. Ecological Processes 2017;6(1):1-11.
Spies TA, Yurner MG. Dynamic forest mosaics. In: Hunter M, editor. Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 95-160.
Subedi M, Matthews RB, Pogson M, Abegaz A, Balana BB, Oyesiku-Blakemore J, et al. Can biogas digesters help to reduce deforestation in Africa? Biomass and Bioenergy 2014;70:87-98.
Tamrakar PR. Biomass and Volume Tables with Species Description for Community Forest Management. Kathmandu, Nepal: MoFSC and NARMSAP-TISC; 2000.
Tarus GK, Nadir SW. Effect of forest management types on soil carbon stocks in Montane Forests: A case study of Eastern Mau Forest in Kenya. International Journal of Forestry Research 2020;2020:Article No. 8862813.
Thong P, Sahoo UK, Thangjam U, Pebam R. Pattern of forest recovery and carbon stock following shifting cultivation in Manipur, North-East India. PLoS ONE 2020;15(10):e0239906.
Vance ED. Conclusions and caveats from studies of managed forest carbon budgets. Forest Ecology and Management 2018;427:350-4.
Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 1934;37(1):29-38.