Willingness to Pay Estimation for the Restoration of Water Quality of a Eutrophic Lake 10.32526/ennrj/22/20240035
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Lakes are recognized as highly susceptible to the impacts of various anthropogenic activities, making them one of the most vulnerable aquatic ecosystems. These ecosystems frequently experience degradation due to the lack of policies recognizing the importance of their often overlooked regulating ecosystem services. A contingent valuation approach was employed to assess the stakeholders’ willingness to pay (WTP) for the restoration of the water quality of a eutrophic lake using the case of Tadlac Lake, situated within the municipality of Los Baños, Laguna Province, Philippines. The findings of the study revealed that households in the area expressed a WTP of Php 95.88/household/month or Php 1,150.56/household/year (1 USD=55.89 Php), with 72.30% of respondents indicating their readiness to support efforts to improve the water quality of Tadlac Lake. The likelihood of a positive response significantly varied depending on factors such as the offered price, gender, educational attainment, duration of residency, household size, income, and the method of questionnaire administration (cheap talk vs. non-cheap talk). These results underscore the community’s favorable disposition towards investing in improving Tadlac Lake’s water quality. This valuation study contributes a fresh perspective on lake management strategies. Moreover, it emphasizes the importance of environmental education regarding social-ecological dynamics as a crucial requirement for crafting comprehensive policies that will steer sustainable management of natural lake resources.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Published articles are under the copyright of the Environment and Natural Resources Journal effective when the article is accepted for publication thus granting Environment and Natural Resources Journal all rights for the work so that both parties may be protected from the consequences of unauthorized use. Partially or totally publication of an article elsewhere is possible only after the consent from the editors.
References
Aadland D, Caplan AJ. Cheap talk reconsidered: New evidence from CVM. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2006;60(4):562-78.
Attree P. Low-income mothers, nutrition and health: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Maternal and Child Nutrition 2005;1(4):227-40.
Bashir I, Lone FA, Bhat RA, Mir SA, Dar ZA, Dar SA. Concerns and threats of contamination on aquatic ecosystems. Bioremediation and Biotechnology 2020;7:1-26.
Bueno EA, Ancog R, Obalan E, Cero AD, Simon AN, Malvecino-Macalintal MR, et al. Measuring households’ willingness to pay for water quality restoration of a natural urban lake in the Philippines. Environmental Processes 2016;3(4):875-94.
Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Lagerkvist CJ. Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments. Economic Letters 2005;89(2):147-52.
Carlsson F, Kataria M, Lampi E. Demand effects in stated preference surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2018;90:294-302.
Carter MR, Barrett CB. The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: An asset-based approach. Journal of Development Studies 2006;42(2):178-9.
Clinch JP. Cost-benefit analysis applied to energy. In: Cutler J, editor. Encyclopedia of Energy. Elsevier Science; 2004. p. 715-25.
Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997;387:253-60.
Cummings RG, Taylor LO. Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. The American Economic Review 1999;89(3):649-65.
Dahal RP, Grala RK, Gordon JS, Petrolia DR, Munn IA. Estimating the willingness to pay to preserve waterfront open spaces using contingent valuation. Land Use Policy 2018;78:614-26.
Donovan GH, Nicholls DL. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for character-marked cabinets from Alaska birch. Forest Product Journal 2003;53(11-12):27-32.
Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata ZI, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, et al. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 2006; 81(2):163-82.
Grazhdani D. Contingent valuation of residents’ attitudes and willingness-to-pay for non-point source pollution control: A case study in AL-Prespa, Southeastern Albania. Environmental Management 2015;56:81-93.
Gebremedhin S, Getahun A, Anteneh W, Bruneel S, Goethals P. A drivers-pressure-state impact-responses framework to support the sustainability of fish and fisheries in Lake Tana, Ethiopia. Sustainability 2018;10(8):Article No. 2957.
Gibson J, Rigby D, Polya D, Russell N. Discrete choice experiments in developing countries: Willingness to pay versus willingness to work. Environmental and Resource Economics 2016;65:697-721.
Halstead JM, Luloff AE, Steven TH. Protest bidders in contingent valuation (CV). Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 1992;21(2):160-9.
Hanemann WM. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspective 1994;8(4):19-43.
Hao Q, Xu S, Liao Y, Qiao D, Shi H, Xu T. Determinants of residents’ willingness to pay for water quality improvements in Haikou, China: Application of CVM and ISM approaches. Water 2023;15(7):Article No. 1305.
Hosany ARS, Hamilton RW. Family responses to resource scarcity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2023;51:1351-81.
Indab A. Willingness to pay for whale shark conservation in Sorsogon, Philippines. In: Olewiler N, Francisco H, Ferrer A, editors. Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Valuation, Institutions, and Policy in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Springer; 2016. p. 93-128.
Jala, Nandagiri L. Evaluation of the economic value of Pilikula Lake using travel cost and contingent valuation methods. Aquatic Procedia 2015;4:1315-21.
Janko AM, Zemedu L. Fishermen’s willingness to pay for fisheries management: The case of Lake Ziway, Ethiopia. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 2015;2(6):320-5.
Kanyoka P, Farolfi S, Morardet S. Households preferences and willingness to pay for multiple use water services in rural areas of South Africa: An analysis based on choice modeling. WaterSA 2008;36:715-24.
Khong TD, Loch A, Young MD. Inferred valuation versus conventional contingent valuation: A salinity intrusion case study. Journal of Environmental Management 2019;243:95-104.
Klein J. The relationship between level of academic education and reversible and irreversible processes of probability decision making. Higher Education 1999;37:323-39.
Makwinja R, Kosamu IBM, Kaonga CC. Determinants and values of willingness to pay for water quality improvement: Insights from Chia lagoon, Malawi. Sustainability 2019;11(17):Article No. 4690.
Klesment M, Bavel JV. Women’s relative resources and couples’ gender balance in financial decision-making. European Sociological Review 2022;38(5):739-53.
Kumar P, Martinez-Alier J. The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity: An international assessment. Economic and Political Weekly 2011;46(24):76-80.
Kolstoe S, Naald BV, Cohan A. A tale of two samples: Understanding WTP differences in the age of social media. Ecosystem Service 2022;55:Article No. 101420.
Lamsal P, Atreya K, Pant KP, Kumar L. An analysis of willingness to pay for community-based conservation activities at the Ghodaghodi Lake Complex, Nepal. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management 2015;11(4):341-8.
Lopez-Becerra EI, Alcon F. Social desirability bias in the environmental economic valuation: An inferred valuation approach. Ecological Economics 2021;184:Article No. 106988.
Luangmany D, Voravong S, Thanthathep K, Souphonphacdy D, Baylatry M. Valuing Environmental Services using Contingent Valuation Method. Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: Economy and Environment Partnership for Southeast Asia; 2009.
Lusk J. Effects of cheap talk on consumer willingness-to-pay for golden rice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2003;85(4):840-56.
Mapa CDS. Preliminary 2023 First Semester Official Poverty Statistics [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Apr 11]. Available from: https://psa.gov.ph/statistics/poverty.
Mendelsohn R, Olmstead S. The economic valuation of environmental amenities and disamenities: Methods and applications. Annual Reviews of Environment and Resource 2009;34(1):325-47.
Minasyan D, Tovmasyan G. Gender differences in decision-making and leadership: Evidence from Armenia. Business Ethics and Leadership 2020;4(1):6-16.
Moffat B, Motlaleng GR, Thukuza A. Households willingness to pay for improved water quality and reliability of supply Chobe Ward, Muan. Botswana Journal of Economics 2011;8(12): 45-61.
Mumbi AW, Watanabe T. Differences in risk perception of water quality and its influencing factors between lay people and factory workers for water management in River Sosiani, Eldoret Municipality Kenya. Water 2020;12:Article No. 2248.
Nakano S, Yahara T, Nakashizuka T. Aquatic Biodiversity Conservation and Ecosystem Services. Singapore: Springer. 2016.
Pontoni F, Creti A, Joets M. Economic and environmental implications of hydropower concession renewals: A case study in Southern France. Revue Economique 2018;2(60):241-66.
Reis JVD, Leitao MDMVBR, Galvincio JD. Willingness to pay for water ecosystem services in a river basin of the in South America largest semi-arid region. Nova Economia 2022;32(1):293-318.
Rounsevell M, Fischer M, Torre-Marin Rando A, Mader A. The regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2024 Feb 7]. Available from: https://www.ipbes.net/ assessment-reports/eca.
Santos-Borja A. Multi-stakeholder’s efforts for the sustainable management of Tadlac Lake, the Philippines [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2024 Feb 7]. Available from: https://satoyama-initiative.org/case_studies/multistakeholders efforts-for-the-sustainablemanagement-of-tadlac-lake-the-philippines/.
Šebo J, Gróf M, Šebová M. A contingent valuation study of a polluted urban lake in Košice, Slovakia: The case of the positive distance effect. Journal of Environmental Management 2019;243:331-9.
Sinclair JS, Fraker ME, Hood JM, Reavie ED, Ludsin SA. Eutrophication, water quality, and fisheries: A wicked management problem with insights from a century of change in Lake Erie. Ecology and Society 2023;28(3):Article No. 10.
Tziakis I, Pachiadakis I, Moraitakis M, Xideas K, Theologis G, Tsagarakis KP. Valuing benefits from wastewater treatment and reuse using contingent valuation methodology. Desalination 2009;237:117-25.
Van Houtven, Powers GJ, Pattanayak K. Valuing water quality improvements in the United States using meta-analysis: Is the glass half-full or half-empty for national policy analysis? Resource and Energy Economics 2007;29:206-28.
Van Oijstaeijen W, Van Passel S, Cools J, de Bisthoven LJ, Hugé J, Berihun D, et al. Farmers’ preferences towards water hyacinth control: A contingent valuation study. Journal of Great Lakes Research 2020;46:1459-68.
Villanueva-Moya L, Expósito F. Spanish women were making risky decisions in the social domain: The mediating role of femininity and fear of negative evaluation. Frontiers in Psychology 2020;11:Article No. 561715.
Villaruel MJS, Camacho MVC. Phytoplankton community dynamics in Tadlac Lake, Los Baños Laguna, Philippines. Journal of Fisheries and Environment 2022;46(3):55-71.
Wegner G, Pascual U. Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique. Global Environmental Change 2011;21(2):492-504.
Weinstein J. The Problem of Rural Education in the Philippines [Internet]. 2010 [Cited 2024 Feb 7]. Available from: https://joshweinstein.wordpress.com/2010/03/02/the-problem-of-education-in-the-philippines/.
Xiong K, Kong F, Zhang N, Lei N, Sun C. Analysis of the factors influencing willingness to pay and payout level for ecological environment improvement of the Ganjiang River basin. Sustainability 2018;10:Article No. 2149.
Yifei Z, Li S, Luo Y. Evaluation of households’ willingness to accept the ecological restoration of rivers flowing in China. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy 2018; 38(4):1-10.
Zelalem L, Beyene F. Willingness to pay for improved rural water supply in Goro-Gutu District of Eastern Ethiopia: An application of contingent valuation. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 2012;3(14):145-59.
Zhen L, Li F, Huang H, Dilly O, Liu J, Wei Y, et al. Households’ willingness to reduce pollution threats in the Poyang Lake Region, Southern China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 2011;110(1):15-22.