Comparison of the Yield and Quality of Teak Wood from Different Plantations in Phrae Province, Thailand 10.32526/ennrj/22/20240069

Main Article Content

Thiti Wanishdilokratn
Siriluk Sukjareon
Itsaree Howpinjai
Teeka Yotapakdee
Wanwasa Wirojanarome
Ratchaneewan Kamton
Siriporn Kiratikarnkul
Lamthai Asanok

Abstract

This study aims to compare the yield and quality of Teak wood from a Forest Industry Organization (FIO) plantation and a private teak plantation (PTP) in Thailand to provide guidelines for the sustainable utilization of teak wood. To quantify yields, we employed a randomized design at two locations (FIO and PTP), and determined volumetric proportions, the yields of milled teak and wood properties. We found that the whole lumber yield differed significantly (p≤0.05) between the two locations, although the yield of lumber sheets did not differ (p>0.05). While more teak wood was produced at the FIO plantation than the PTP, the sawing techniques used at the two locations resulted in no significant difference in wood yield. Wood drying had significantly different effects (p≤0.05) between the two locations, but the drying method did not differ (p>0.05). Overall, the lumber yields were greater for timber harvested from an FIO plantation than a PTP. Even though there are differences in sawing techniques adopted, the final lumber yield did not differ significantly between these two sources. The mechanical properties of teak wood improved with kiln drying, FIO plantation exhibits better properties than dried wood from the PTP.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wanishdilokratn, T. ., Sukjareon, S., Howpinjai, I., Yotapakdee, T., Wirojanarome, W., Kamton, R., Kiratikarnkul, S., & Asanok, L. (2024). Comparison of the Yield and Quality of Teak Wood from Different Plantations in Phrae Province, Thailand: 10.32526/ennrj/22/20240069. Environment and Natural Resources Journal, 22(5), 431–436. Retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ennrj/article/view/253242
Section
Original Research Articles

References

Abdulah L, Suhendang E, Purnomo H, Matangaran JR. Measuring the sustainability of wood consumption at the household level in Indonesia: Case study in Bogor, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 2020;21(2):457-64.

Adi DS, Sudarmanto, Ismadi, Gopar M, Darmawan T, Amin Y, et al. Evaluation of the wood quality of platinum Teak wood. Teknologi Indonesia 2016;39(1):36-44.

Adu S, Adu G, Mensah KF, Boasiako CA, Effah B, Adjei S. Maximizing wood residue utilization and reducing its production rate to combat climate change. International Journal of Plant and Forestry Sciences 2014;1(2):1-12.

Alteyrac J, Cloutier A, Ung CH, Zhang SY. Mechanical properties in relation to selected wood characteristics of black spruce. Wood and Fiber Science 2006;38(2):229-37.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). D 143. Standard Methods of Testing Small Clear Specimens of Timber. American Society for Testing and Materials International; 2014.

Amoah M, Inyoung S. Comparison of some physical, mechanical and anatomical properties of smallholder plantation Teak (Tectona grandis Linn.f.) from dry and wet localities of Ghana. Journal of the Indian Academy of Wood Science 2019;16(2):125-38.

Baltrušaitis A, Pranckevičienė V. The influence of log offset on sawn timber volume yield. Materials Science (Medžiagotyra) 2005;11(4):403-6.

Batista DC, Lube VM, Silva JGMD, Barbieri J, Vitoria RD. Analysis of the kiln drying process of a sawmill in Espírito Santo state, Brazil: A case study. Brazilian Journal of Wood Science 2017;8(3):177-86.

Bermejo I, Canellas I, Miguel AS. Growth and yield models for Teak plantations in Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management 2004;189(1-3):97-110.

Bhat KM, Priya PB. Influence of provenance variation on wood properties of teak from the Western Ghat Region in India. IAWA Journal 2004;25(3):273-82.

Bomba J, Bohm M, Sedivka P, Friess F, Oralkova R. Influence of selected factors on the sawing capacity of sawmills in the Czech Republic. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 2016; 47(4):174-80.

British Standard (BS). BS 373. Method of Testing Small Clear Specimens of Timber. British Standards Institution; 1985.

Djati ID, Tauchi T, Kubo M, Terauchi F. Mechanical properties and characteristics of young Teak for making products. Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design 2015:62(3):25-34.

Dotaniya ML, Meena VD, Lata M, Meena HP. Teak plantation: A potential source of income generation. Popular Kheti 2013;1(3):61-3.

Izekor DN, Fuwape JA. Performance of Teak (Tectona grandis L.F) wood on exposure to outdoor weather conditions. The Journal of Applied Science 2011;15(1):217-22.

Kalu C, Adeyoju SK. Socioeconomic causes of unregulated Teak plantation exploitation in Edo State, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 2011;30(5):406-18.

Krilek J, Kovac J, Kucera M. Wood crosscutting process analysis for circular saws. BioResources 2014;9(1):1417-29.

Kaakkurivaara N. Chapter 6: Teak Timber Harvesting. p. 202-2011. In: Trisurat Y, Hwan-ok Ma, Yanuariadi T, Kant P, Thulasidas PK, editors. Teak in Mekong for a Sustainable Future. Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand; International Tropical Timber Organization; 2022. p. 359.

Li B, Zhang Z. Research on the effect of yield strength of circular saw blade on roll tensioning process. Journal of Wood Science 2017;63(2):140-6.

Lima ILD, Ranzini M, Longui EL, Barbosa JDA. Wood characterization of Tectona grandis L.F. cultivated in Brazil: A review of the last 30 years. Society and Development 2021;10(14):e162101421549.

Lima RBD, Ferreira RLC, Silva JAAD, Guedes MC, Oliveira CPD, Silva DASD, et al. Lumber volume modeling of Amazon Brazilian species. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 2018;38(3):262-74.

Loucanova E, Palus H, Dzian M. A course of innovations in wood processing industry within the forestry-wood chain in Slovakia: A Q methodology study to identify future orientation in the sector. Forests 2017;8(6):Article No. 210.

Melo RRD, Rocha MJ, Junior FR, Stangerlin DM. Análise da influência do diâmetro no rendimento em madeira serrada de cambará. Pesquisa. Florestal Brasileira 2016;36(88):393-8.

Miranda I, Sousa V, Pereira H. Wood properties of Teak (Tectona grandis) from a mature unmanaged stand in East Timor. Journal of Wood Science 2010;57(1):171-8.

Moghanaki SK, Khoshandam1 B, Mirhaj MH. Calculation of moisture content and drying rate during microwave drying. Applied Mechanics and Materials 2013;423-426:746-9.

Munoz GR, Gete AR, Regueiro MG. Variation in log quality and prediction of sawing yield in oak wood (Quercus robur). Annals of Forest Science 2013;70(7):695-706.

Ovrum A, Hoibo OA, Vestoi GI. Grade yield of lumber in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) as affected by forest quality, tree size, and log length. Forest Products Journal 2009;59(6):70-8.

Rabidin ZA, Seng GK, Wahab MJA. Characteristics of timbers dried using kiln drying and radio frequency-vacuum drying systems. MATEC Web of Conferences 2017;108(10001):1-5.

Rizanti DE, Darmawan W, George B, Merlin A, Dumarcay S, Chapuis H, et al. Comparison of Teak wood properties according to forest management: Short versus long rotation. Annals of Forest Science 2018;75(2):1-12.

Seviset S, Piromgram T, Saributr U, Porncharoen R, Raerai K, Charoensettasilp S. Mechanical property of 9 years old thinning of Teak plantation in Thailand. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering; 2016 Oct 21-23; Shanghai: China; 2017.

Solorzano S, Moya R, Murillo O. Early prediction of basic density, shrinking, presence of growth stress, and dynamic elastic modulus based on the morphological tree parameters of Tectona grandis. Journal of Wood Science 2012;58(4):290-9.

Stone IJ, Benjamin JG, Leahy J. Applying innovation theory to Maine’s logging industry. Journal of Forestry 2011; 109(8):462-9.

Tewari VP, Mariswamy KM. Heartwood, sapwood and bark content of Teak trees grown in Karnataka, India. Journal of Forestry Research 2013;24(4):721-5.

Thulasidas PK, Bhat KM. Mechanical properties and wood structure characteristics of 35-year old home-garden Teak from wet and dry localities of Kerala, India in comparison with plantation Teak. Journal of the Indian Academy of Wood Science 2012;9(1):23-32.

Udayana C, Andreassen HP, Skarpe C. Understory diversity and composition after planting of teak and mahogany in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 2019;39(5):494-510.

Wang CY, Rolf C. Frame sawing of stone: Theory and technology. Key Engineering Materials 2003;250:171-80.

Wanneng PX, Ozarska B, Daian MS. Physical properties of Tectona Grandis grown in Laos. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2014;26(3):389-96.

Warner AJ, Jamreonprucksa M, Puangchit L. Development and evaluation of Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) taper equations in northern Thailand. Agriculture and Natural Resources 2016;50(5):362-7.

Yotapakdee T, Kongsuban N, Lattirasuvan T, Mangkita W. Determinants of food bank from Melientha suavis Pierre in a rural community in Phrae Province, Thailand. Environment and Natural Resources Journal 2018;13(2):44-54.