Microplastic Pollution in an Urban Wastewater Treatment Plant: Unravelling Problems and Proposing Solutions 10.32526/ennrj/23/20240092
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Microplastics (MPs) are detected ubiquitously in aquatic environments worldwide, with wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) serving as significant pathways for their entry. This study investigates MP removal efficiency and suggests improvements in a conventional municipal WWTP in Bangkok, Thailand. Wastewater samples were collected using a volume-reduced method and filtered into three size ranges (0.05-0.5, 0.5-1.0, and 1.0-5.0 mm). Particles bigger than 0.5 mm were assessed for abundance using an optical microscope and identified for polymer types using attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy, while smaller particles were analyzed using fluorescence microscopy and micro-FTIR. The average concentration of MPs entering the WWTP was 16.55±9.92 MPs/L, whereas the concentration discharged into the environment was 3.52±1.43 MPs/L. The resultant MP removal efficiency of the Bangkok WWTP stands at approximately 78%, a figure lower than that of WWTPs in developed countries. This discrepancy is attributed to the absence of a primary clarifier within the Bangkok WWTP and an under-designed grit channel. Thus, the implementation of a filter system using activated carbon is suggested. Based on the calculations, 21 filter units are required for the Bangkok WWTP to improve MPs’ removal effectiveness. This study provides vital data on the presence of MPs in a Bangkok WWTP, emphasizing challenges that impede effective removal efficiency. Additionally, this study proposes potential solutions to enhance the removal of MPs and address these issues.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Published articles are under the copyright of the Environment and Natural Resources Journal effective when the article is accepted for publication thus granting Environment and Natural Resources Journal all rights for the work so that both parties may be protected from the consequences of unauthorized use. Partially or totally publication of an article elsewhere is possible only after the consent from the editors.
References
Amirah Mohd Napi Nn, Ibrahim N, Adli Hanif M, Hasan M, Dahalan FA, Syafiuddin A, et al. Column-based removal of high concentration microplastics in synthetic wastewater using granular activated carbon. Bioengineered 2023;14(1):Article No. 2276391.
Arena N, Lee J, Clift R. Life Cycle Assessment of activated carbon production from coconut shells. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016;125:68-77.
Bakir A, O’Connor IA, Rowland SJ, Hendriks AJ, Thompson RC. Relative importance of microplastics as a pathway for the transfer of hydrophobic organic chemicals to marine life. Environmental Pollution 2016;219:56-65.
Benstöm F. Granular Activated Carbon for the Elimination of Organic Micropollutants form Municipal Wastewater [dissertation]. Germany: RWTH Aachen University; 2017.
Carr KE, Smyth SH, McCullough MT, Morris JF, Moyes SM. Morphological aspects of interactions between microparticles and mammalian cells: Intestinal uptake and onward movement. Progress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 2012;46(4):185-252.
Çeçen F, Aktas Ö. Activated Carbon for Water and Wastewater Treatment: Integration of Adsorption and Biological Treatment. John Wiley and Sons; 2011.
Chen R, Qi M, Zhang G, Yi C. Comparative experiments on polymer degradation technique of produced water of polymer flooding oilfield. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2018;113:Article No. 012208.
Chirisa I, Bandauko E, Matamanda A, Mandisvika G. Decentralized domestic wastewater systems in developing countries: The case study of Harare (Zimbabwe). Applied Water Science 2017;7(3):1069-78.
De Sá LC, Luís LG, Guilhermino L. Effects of microplastics on juveniles of the common goby (Pomatoschistus microps): Confusion with prey, reduction of the predatory performance and efficiency, and possible influence of developmental conditions. Environmental Pollution 2015;196:359-62.
De Sá LC, Oliveira M, Ribeiro F, Rocha TL, Futter MN. Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: what do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? Science of the Total Environment 2018;645:1029-39.
Fundneider T, Alonso VA, Wick A, Albrecht D, Lackner S. Implications of biological activated carbon filters for micropollutant removal in wastewater treatment. Water Research 2021;189:Article No. 116588.
Gidstedt S, Betsholtz A, Falås P, Cimbritz M, Davidsson Å, Micolucci F, et al. A comparison of adsorption of organic micropollutants onto activated carbon following chemically enhanced primary treatment with microsieving, direct membrane filtration and tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater. Science of the Total Environment 2022; 811:Article No. 152225.
Gies EA, LeNoble JL, Noël M, Etemadifar A, Bishay F, Hall ER, et al. Retention of microplastics in a major secondary wastewater treatment plant in Vancouver, Canada. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2018;133:553-61.
Hidayaturrahman H, Lee TG. A study on characteristics of microplastic in wastewater of South Korea: Identification, quantification, and fate of microplastics during treatment process. Marine Pollutution Bulletin 2019;146:696-702.
Horton AA, Walton A, Spurgeon DJ, Lahive E, Svendsen C. Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: Evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities. Science of the Total Environment 2017;586:127-41.
Khalidi-Idrissi A, Madinzi A, Anouzla A, Pala A, Mouhir L, Kadmi Y, et al. Recent advances in the biological treatment of wastewater rich in emerging pollutants produced by pharmaceutical industrial discharges. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2023;20(10):11719-40.
Kim KT, Park S. Enhancing microplastics removal from wastewater using electro-coagulation and granule-activated carbon with thermal regeneration. Processes 2021;9(4):Article No. 617.
Kirstein IV, Kirmizi S, Wichels A, Garin-Fernandez A, Erler R, Loder M, et al. Dangerous hitchhikers? Evidence for potentially pathogenic Vibrio spp. on microplastic particles. Marine Environment Research 2016;120:1-8.
Lee H, Kim Y. Treatment characteristics of microplastics at biological sewage treatment facilities in Korea. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2018;137:1-8.
Lewoyehu M. Comprehensive review on synthesis and application of activated carbon from agricultural residues for the remediation of venomous pollutants in wastewater. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2021;159:Article No. 105279.
Liu W, Zhang J, Liu H, Guo X, Zhang X, Yao X, et al. A review of the removal of microplastics in global wastewater treatment plants: Characteristics and mechanisms. Environment International 2021;146:Article No. 106277.
Liu X, Yuan W, Di M, Li Z, Wang J. Transfer and fate of microplastics during the conventional activated sludge process in one wastewater treatment plant of China. Chemical Engineering Journal 2019;362:176-82.
Long Z, Pan Z, Wang W, Ren J, Yu X, Lin L, et al. Microplastic abundance, characteristics, and removal in wastewater treatment plants in a coastal city of China. Water Research 2019;155:255-65.
Lusher AL, McHugh M, Thompson RC. Occurrence of microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of pelagic and demersal fish from the English Channel. Marine Pollutution Bulletin 2013;67(1-2):94-9.
Magni S, Binelli A, Pittura L, Avio CG, Della Torre C, Parenti CC, et al. The fate of microplastics in an Italian Wastewater Treatment Plant. Science of the Total Environment 2019; 652:602-10.
Mintenig SM, Int-Veen I, Löder MG, Primpke S, Gerdts G. Identification of microplastic in effluents of waste water treatment plants using focal plane array-based micro-Fourier-transform infrared imaging. Water Research 2017;108:365-72.
Murphy F, Ewins C, Carbonnier F, Quinn B. Wastewater treatment works (WwTW) as a source of microplastics in the aquatic environment. Environmental Science and Technology 2016;50(11):5800-8.
Nguyen P-D, Tran Q-V, Le T-T, Nguyen Q-H, Kieu-Le T-C, Strady E. Evaluation of microplastic removal efficiency of wastewater-treatment plants in a developing country, Vietnam. Environmental Technology and Innovation 2023;29:Article No. 102994.
PlasticsEurope. Plastics - the Fast Facts 2023. Brussels, Belgium: Plastics Europe; 2023.
Sadia M, Mahmood A, Ibrahim M, Irshad MK, Quddusi AHA, Bokhari A, et al. Microplastics pollution from wastewater treatment plants: A critical review on challenges, detection, sustainable removal techniques and circular economy. Environmental Technology and Innovation 2022;28:Article No. 102946.
Sturm MT, Myers E, Schober D, Korzin A, Thege C, Schuhen K. Comparison of AOP, GAC, and novel organosilane-based process for the removal of microplastics at a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Water 2023;15(6):Article No. 1164.
Sutton R, Mason SA, Stanek SK, Willis-Norton E, Wren IF, Box C. Microplastic contamination in the San Francisco bay, California, USA. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2016;109(1):230-5.
Ta AT, Babel S. Microplastics pollution with heavy metals in the aquaculture zone of the Chao Phraya River Estuary, Thailand. Marine Pollutution Bulletin 2020;161:Article No. 111747.
Ta AT, Babel S. Microplastics and heavy metals in a tropical river: Understanding spatial and seasonal trends and developing response strategies using DPSIR framework. Science of the Total Environment 2023a;897:Article No. 165405.
Ta AT, Babel S. Occurrence and spatial distribution of microplastic contaminated with heavy metals in a tropical river: Effect of land use and population density. Marine Pollutution Bulletin 2023b;191:Article No. 114919.
Ta AT, Babel S, Wang LP. Prevalence and characteristics of microplastic contamination in soft drinks and potential consumer exposure. Journal of Environmental Management 2025;373:Article No. 123810.
Ta AT, Promchan N. Microplastics in wastewater from developing countries: A comprehensive review and methodology suggestions. TRAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2024; 171:Article No. 117537.
Ta AT, Pupuang P, Babel S, Wang LP. Investigation of microplastic contamination in blood cockles and green mussels from selected aquaculture farms and markets in Thailand. Chemosphere 2022;303:Article No. 134918.
Tadsuwan K, Babel S. Unraveling microplastics removal in wastewater treatment plant: A comparative study of two wastewater treatment plants in Thailand. Chemosphere 2022;307:Article No. 135733.
Talvitie J, Mikola A, Koistinen A, Setälä O. Solutions to microplastic pollution-Removal of microplastics from wastewater effluent with advanced wastewater treatment technologies. Water Research 2017;123:401-7.
Viršek MK, Lovšin MN, Koren Š, Kržan A, Peterlin M. Microplastics as a vector for the transport of the bacterial fish pathogen species Aeromonas salmonicida. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2017;125(1-2):301-9.
Wang Z, Sedighi M, Lea-Langton A. Filtration of microplastic spheres by biochar: Removal efficiency and immobilisation mechanisms. Water Research 2020;184:Article No. 116165.
Zhang QH, Yang WN, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Jin PK, Dzakpasu M, et al. Current status of urban wastewater treatment plants in China. Environment International 2016;92-93:11-22.
Ziajahromi S, Neale PA, Silveira IT, Chua A, Leusch FD. An audit of microplastic abundance throughout three Australian wastewater treatment plants. Chemosphere 2021;263:Article No. 128294.