Estimation of Stature and Sex from Step Length and Shoe Dimensions for Forensic Investigation

Main Article Content

Sirirat Choosakoonkriang
Orathai Kheawpum

Abstract

Footwear impression marks and footwear are among the most commonly found evidence at crime scenes. The aim of this study was to develop a formula for estimation of the stature and gender of an individual if the shoe dimensions and step length of that individual were known. The footwear dimensions (length and width) were collected from 320 subjects, comprising 152 males and 168 females, ranging from 18 to 44 years of age. A statistical model for sex and height prediction was constructed using logistic regression and multiple linear regression analysis, respectively. In general, the stature, shoe width, shoe length and average step length were significantly larger in males than in females (p<0.05). The strongest correlation coefficient (r) was observed in the step length for female and male. While for the pooled sample, the shoe size showed greatest and strong positive correlation coefficient. The lowest correlation was observed in shoe length in all groups. This study is demonstrated that the dimension of the shoe and the step length can be used to estimate stature and sex of the shoe owner. These models may be useful in the forensic investigation of criminal cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Choosakoonkriang, S., & Kheawpum, O. (2020). Estimation of Stature and Sex from Step Length and Shoe Dimensions for Forensic Investigation. Interdisciplinary Research Review, 15(6), 1 - 5. Retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtir/article/view/242359
Section
Research Articles

References

[1] W. M. Krogman, M.Y. Isçan, The human skeleton in forensic medicine, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1986, pp. 202 - 08.
[2] P. Hamer, C. Price, Case report: a transfer from skin to clothing by kicking the detection and enhancement of shoeprints, Journal of the Forensic Science Society 33(3) (1993) 169 - 172.
[3] D. Atamturk, Estimation of sex from the dimensions of foot, footprints, and shoe, Anthropologischer Anzeiger 68(1) (2010) 21 - 29.
[4] G. Laskowski, An improved technique for the visualization of footprint impressions in the insoles of athletic shoes, Journal of Forensic Science 32(4) (1987) 1075 - 1078.
[5] M. Liukkonen, H. Majamaa, J. Virtanen, The role and duties of the shoeprint/toolmark examiner in forensic laboratories, Forensic science international 82(1) (1996) 99 - 108.
[6] K, Krishan, A. Sharma, Estimation of stature from dimensions of hands and feet in a North Indian population, Journal of forensic and legal medicine 14(6) (2007) 327 - 332.
[7] H. VanHoven, A correlation between shoeprint measurements and actual sneaker size, Journal of Forensic Science 30(4) (1985) 1233 - 1237.
[8] E. Giles, P. Vallandigham, Height estimation from foot and shoeprint length, Journal of Forensic Science 36(4) (1991) 1134 - 1151.
[9] A. O. Emeka, E. N. Michael, C. I. Euphemia, C. O. Obun, Stature Prediction using Shoe Print Dimensions of an Adult Nigeria, Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences & Forensic Medicine 1(8) (2018) 989 - 1003.
[10] H. Ozden, Y. Balci, C. Demirustu, A. Turgut, M. Ertugrul, Stature and sex estimate using foot and shoe dimensions, Forensic Science International 147(2-3) (2015) 181 - 4.
[11] T. Kanchan, R. G. Menezes, R. Moudgil, R. Kaur, M. S. Kotian, R. K. Garg, Stature estimation from foot dimensions, Forensic Science International 179(2-3) (2008) 241.e1 - 241.e5.
[12] I. A. Fawzy, N. N. Kamal, Stature and body weight estimation from various footprint measurements among Egyptian population, Journal of forensic sciences 55(4) (2010) 884 - 888.
[13] J. Ekezie, G. I. Ndubuka, S. B. Danborno, S. S. Okeke, I. W. Osuchukwu, A Study of Correlations and Estimation of Stature from Foot Trace and Shoe Trace Dimensions, International Journal of Forensic Sciences 1(3) (2016) 1 - 13.
[14] S. Smith, Attribution of foot bones to sex and population groups, Journal of Forensic Science 42(2) (1997) 186 - 195.