Cost Effectiveness of Implementing Community Quarantine in Selected Areas of the Partido District, Philippines
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study measured the cost effectiveness of Community Quarantine (CQ) enforced by selected local government units in the Partido District, Philippines. It tracked the incidence of COVID cases; traced the decrease or increase in the number of COVID cases; calculated the average cost of each COVID case; and extrapolated the amount of saving or dissaving. It utilized key informant interview to gather specific sets of data. Based on the raw assumptions of Efficiency and Input-Output Analysis, this is a typical example of inefficiency because there were costs incurred but the benefits were undeterminable. However, the study uncovered that the after-CQ periods presented a relatively lower cost per day than the within-CQ periods. Therefore, it may be surmised that the CQ accomplished what it was meant to carry out – to arrest the transmission of the virus, decrease the number of cases and the cost of caring for patients. Based on the findings and the foregoing discussion, this study posited that the CQ in the study areas were cost-effective. The number of COVID cases dropped considerably after the CQ periods. Correspondingly, the average cost per day on COVID patients also decreased after the CQ periods. The reduction in the cost, logically, represented saving on the part of the local government units.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
R. Rowthorn, J. Maciejowski, ). A cost-benefit analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. August 29, 2020, Doi: 10.1093/oxrep/graa030. PMCID: PMC7499782.
D.W. Based on the findings and the foregoing discussion, this study posits that the CQ in the study areas were cost-effective. The number of COVID cases dropped considerably after the CQ periods. Correspondingly, the average cost per day on COVID patients also decreased after the CQ periods. The reduction in the cost, logically, represented saving on the part of the local government units.
Allen, Covid-19 Lockdown Cost/Benefits: A Critical Assessment of the Literature, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 2022, 29:1, 1-32, DOI: 10.1080/13571516.2021.1976051
M.Yanovskiy, Y. Socol, Are Lockdowns Effective in Managing Pandemics? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 29;19(15):9295. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159295. PMID: 35954650; PMCID: PMC9368251.
D. Miles, M. Stedman, A. Heald, Living with COVID-19: Balancing Costs Against Benefits in the Face of the Virus, National Institute Economic Review. 2020;253:R60-R76. doi:10.1017/nie.2020.30
E.Alfano, S. Ercolano, The Efficacy of Lockdown Against COVID-19: A Cross-Country Panel Analysis. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Aug;18(4):509-517. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00596-3. PMID: 32495067; PMCID: PMC7268966.
A.Melia, D. Lee, D., N. Mahmoudi, Y. Li, F. Paolucci, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of COVID-19 Case Quarantine Strategies in Two Australian States: New South Wales and Western Australia. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2021, 14, 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14070305
Q. Wang, N. Shi, J. Huang, L. Yang, T. Cui, J. Ai, H. Ji, K. Xu, T. Ahmad, C. Bao, and H. Jin, Cost-Effectiveness of Public Health Measures to Control COVID-19 in China: A Microsimulation Modeling Study. Front. Public Health 9:726690. 2022. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.726690
A. Gandjour, Cost-effectiveness of future lockdown policies against the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Services Management Research. 2023;36(1):51-62. doi:10.1177/09514848221080687
Asian Development Bank (2020). Cost-Effectiveness of Health System Enhancement to Address and Limit COVID-19. (RRP PHI 54171-002. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/linked-documents/54171-002-ea.pdf
P.Boettke, B.Powell, The political economy of the COVID-19 pandemic. South Econ J. 2021; 87: 1090–1106. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12488
T.Raa, Efficiency and Input-Ouput Analyses: Theory and Applications. ISBN:978-981-123-330-2. https://doi.org/10.1142/12131. June 2021, pp.432