Teaching Method for Active Learning Using Thinking and Practical Skills

Main Article Content

Sirinthorn Sinjindawong
Panudach Phatumma
Waraporn Thaima

Abstract

The objectives of this paper were to: 1) study and analyse active learning instructional management, 2) summarise the results of the application of teaching and learning techniques using active learning. The population were 342 instructors. The research tool was a questionnaire on instructional management. The data were analysed with frequency, percentage and content analysis. The research findings revealed that: 1) active learning instructional management were divided into four groups as follows: 1.1) focus on developing individual thinking skills, 1.2) focus on developing individual practical skills, 1.3) focus on developing group thinking skills and 1.4) focus on the development of group practical skills. 2) The results of active learning instructional management were as follows: 2.1) learning by doing, 2.2) project-based learning, 2.3) brainstorming and 2.4) case study and discussion. promote active learning, universities should encourage learning exchange forums, and promote cross-disciplinary teaching integration and cross-disciplinary learning techniques

Article Details

How to Cite
Sinjindawong, S., Phatumma, P., & Thaima, W. . . (2025). Teaching Method for Active Learning Using Thinking and Practical Skills . Interdisciplinary Research Review, 20(1). retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtir/article/view/256420
Section
Research Articles

References

K. Chatkaew, & S. Pymsa-ard, Active learning management in the Thailand 4.0 era of lower secondary school teachers, Humanities and Social Sciences Journal Ratchaphruek University 7(1) (2021) 136–151 [in Thai].

K. Phoyen, Active learning: Learning satisfy education in 21st century, Journal of Education Silpakorn University 19(1) (2021) 11–28 [in Thai].

A.J. Rissanen, Active and peer learning in STEM education strategy, Science Education International 25(1) (2014) 1–7.

Z. Zayapragassarazan, & S.Kumar, Active learning method, NTTC Bulletin 19(1) (2012) 3–5.

E. Lugosi, & G. Uribe, Active learning strategies with positive effects on students’ achievements in undergraduate mathematics education, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 53(2) (2022) 403–424.

H. Hartikainen, H. Rintala, L. Pylvas, & P. Nokelainen, The concept of active learning and the measurement of learning outcomes, A review of research in engineering higher education. Education Sciences 9(276) (2019) 1–19.

R. Carr, S. Palmer, & P. Hagel, Active learning: The importance of developing a comprehensive measure, Active Learning in Higher Education 16(3) (2015) 1–14.

E. Lugosi, & G. Uribe, Active learning strategies with positive effects on students’ achievements in undergraduate mathematics education, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 53(2) (2022) 403–424.

A.J. Welsh, Exploring undergraduates’ perceptions of the use of active learning techniques in science lectures, Journal of College Science Teaching 42(2) (2012) 80–87.

R.J. Rovinelli, & R.K. Hambleton, On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity, Dutch Journal of Educational Research 2 (1977) 49–60.

Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching, Iowa State University. (n.d.). 226 Active learning techniques. https://www.celt.iastate.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2017/03/CELT226activelearningtechniques.pdf. Available from: 20 December 2021.