Green Office Method to Low Carbon Office: A Pathway for Thailand’s Sustainable Future
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Green Office Thailand has become an important mechanism for promoting environmentally responsible practices within organizations, such as reducing resource consumption and generating waste. However, in the context of global climate change and increasing pressure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, organizations are expected to move beyond general environmental management toward more measurable and data-driven carbon reduction strategies. This study examines the role of the Green Office method as a pathway toward the development of Low-Carbon Offices in Thailand. The paper describes the principles of the Thailand Green Office standard, analyzes the concept of Low Carbon Office buildings, and explores practical approaches for transitioning from conventional Green Office practices to carbon-oriented office management. Key strategies include carbon footprint assessment, the adoption of energy-efficient building systems, integration of renewable energy technologies such as rooftop solar photovoltaic systems, and the use of smart building technologies for energy monitoring and optimization. In addition, organizational factors such as leadership commitment, employee engagement, sustainable procurement, and behavioral change are identified as essential components in achieving long-term sustainability. The study also highlights future operational strategies, including digital building management, carbon credit mechanisms, circular economy practices, and nature-based solutions. The findings suggest that the transformation from Green Office to Low Carbon Office represents a significant step toward strengthening organizational sustainability and supporting Thailand’s national climate goals. By integrating technological innovation with sustainable organizational culture, offices in Thailand can significantly reduce environmental impacts while improving operational efficiency and contributing to the country’s transition toward a low-carbon economy
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
S. Aroonsrimorakot, K. Sarapirom, The development of green office standard: Thailand initiative, Interdisciplinary Research Review 15(2) (2020) 8 – 18.
S. Aroonsrimorakot, M. Laiphrakpam, C. Korattana, Green office, its features and importance for sustainable environmental management: A comparative review in search for similarities and differences, Interdisciplinary Research Review 14(5) (2019) 31 – 38.
S. Aroonsrimorakot, Green Office Management Standard in Mahidol University, Thailand, Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 26(4) (2018) 2505 – 2521.
S. Aroonsrimorakot, M. Laiphrakpam, Indicator guidelines for the Green Office Standards (GOS) of Thailand, Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 46(4) (2025) 460412 – 460412.
X. Xu, H. Yu, Q. Sun, V.W. Tam, A critical review of occupant energy consumption behavior in buildings: How we got here, where we are, and where we are headed, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 182 (2023) 113396.
M.A. Salam, Future of circular economy in Thailand: Evidence from corporate efforts, Wisdom Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 2(1) (2025) 56 – 61.
P. Havarangsi, C. Samarnbutra, S. Vithayaporn, Green Supply Chain Management and Managing the Green Enterprise Affecting Performances in Auto-Parts Manufacturers in Thailand, Burapha Journal of Business Management 14(1) (2025) 134 – 158.
A.I. Balin, B.E. Balin, Revisiting the impacts of green purchasing practices on environmental and economic performances: A case study for the Marmara region of Turkiye, Sustainable Futures 9 (2025) 100464.
P.S. Nimlyat, Y.J. Inusa, P.K. Nanfel, A literature review of indoor air quality and sick building syndrome in office building design environment, Green Building & Construction Economics (2023) 1 – 18.
T.Q. Thach, D. Mahirah, C. Sauter, A.C. Roberts, G. Dunleavy, N. Nazeha, Y. Rykov, Y. Zhang, G.I. Christopoulos, C.K. Soh, J. Car, Associations of perceived indoor environmental quality with stress in the workplace, Indoor Air 30(6) (2020) 1166 – 1177.
S. Aroonsrimorakot, K. Bhaktikul, M. Laiphrakpam, S. Mungkhun, K. Sarapirom, P. Pradabphetrat, Satisfaction evaluation of the Green Office (GO) projects in Thailand: A step towards achieving continuous sustainability, Interdisciplinary Research Review 21(2) (2026).
A. Phdungsilp, Integrated energy and carbon modeling with a decision support system: Policy scenarios for low-carbon city development in Bangkok, Energy Policy 38(9) (2010) 4808 – 4817.
Y. Horthong, P. Pathranarakul, C. Aunphattanasilp, An Examination of Factors Enhancing Sustainable Renewable Energy Consumption in Thailand During 2000-2020, Journal of Public Administration, Public Affairs, and Management 23(1) (2025) 1 – 32.
B. Viriyaroj, M. Kuittinen, S.H. Gheewala, Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand, Buildings & Cities 5(1) (2024) 247 – 267.
P. Pongthanya, A. Sharp, Carbon footprint of office buildings in Bangkok: A lifecycle perspective, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 27(4) (2020) 345 – 358.
O.F. Kofoworola, S.H. Gheewala, Environmental life cycle assessment of a commercial office building in Thailand, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(6) (2008) 498 – 511.
W. Rattanongphisat, W. Rordprapat, Strategy for energy efficient buildings in tropical climate, Energy Procedia 52 (2014) 10 – 17.
R. Bulbaai, J.I. Halman, Energy-efficient building design for a tropical climate: A field study on the Caribbean island Curaçao, Sustainability 13(23) (2021) 13274.
M. Airaksinen, P. Matilainen, A carbon footprint of an office building, Energies 4(8) (2011) 1197 – 1210.
C. Tantasavasdi, N. Inprom, Residential unit design for natural ventilation in tropical multi-family high-rises with a double-loaded corridor, Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning 22(3) (2023) 315.
B. Wattana, P. Aungyut, Impacts of Solar Electricity Generation on the Thai Electricity Industry, International Journal of Renewable Energy Development 11(1) (2022) 157 – 163.
L. Farungsang, A.C. Varquez, K. Tokimatsu, Geospatial assessment and economic analysis of rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in Thailand, Sustainability 17(15) (2025) 7052.
Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization, Guidelines for carbon footprint for organizations (CFO), Available online in 2024, Available from: https://thaicarbonlabel.tgo.or.th/index.php?lang=EN&mod=YjNKbllXNXBlbUYwYVc5dVgybHo
A.K. Yahia, M. Shahjalal, Sustainable materials selection in building design and construction, International Journal of Science and Engineering 1(4) (2024) 10-62304.
J. Pongthanaisawan, W. Wangjiraniran, N. Nakapreecha, Thailand energy scenarios: pathways towards carbon neutrality 2050, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 13(1) (2023) 489 – 500.
P. Obioma, Q. Agbodike, J. Chen, L. Wang, ISLS: IoT-based smart lighting system for improving energy conservation in office buildings, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13474 (2025).
T. Hong, S.C. Taylor-Lange, S. D'Oca, D. Yan, S.P. Corgnati, Advances in research and applications of energy-related occupant behavior in buildings, Energy and Buildings 116 (2016) 694 – 702.
S.W. Hnin, A. Javed, J. Karnjana, C. Jeenanunta, Y. Kohda, Workplace sustainability: energy-saving behaviors in office environments of Thailand, Frontiers in Psychology 16 (2025) 1400410.
B.A. Alemu, Cultivating a culture of sustainability: the role of organizational values and leadership in driving sustainable practices, Business Ethics and Leadership 9(1) (2025) 79 – 94.
A.R. Suleman, M. Nejati, J. Redmond, A. Shafaei, Check-in to sustainability: a comparative study of green human resource management practices in emerging and established hotels, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal (2026) 1 – 28.
S. Bogia, R.K. Saini, D.K. Saini, R. Thakur, P. Verma, Energy and climate nexus: A systematic review of challenges, solutions, and future directions, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 234 (2026) 116896.
S. Chansomsak, K.S. Seggerman, Institutionalization of green building policy in Thailand, Journal of Cleaner Production 345 (2022) 131 – 142.
Z. Li, Y. Wu, E. Rasoulinezhad, Y. Sheng, C. Bi, Green economic recovery in central Asia by utilizing natural resources, Resource Policy 83 (2023) 103621.
Center of Excellence in Finance, Green Financial Instruments and Debt, Available online in 2026, Available from: https://www.cef-see.org/24-gfiad-2128
Y. Shi, B. Yang, Green finance instruments and empowering sustainability in East Asian economies, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12(1) (2025) 11.
H. Wu, Y. Chang, Y. Chen, Greenhouse gas emissions under work from home vs. office: An activity-based individual-level accounting model, Applied Energy 353 (2024) 122167.
P. Maneejuk, W. Yamaka, Green complexity and its dual threshold effects: balancing environmental impact and economic growth, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 28(2) (2026) 565 – 592.