Analysis of Inflectional Morpheme Use in the Written Compositions of Pre-Service Teachers

Main Article Content

Gisela Abansa
Porferio II Pitogo
Roniel Guitguiten
Sheryleen Belcee Roma
Amytheez Villa
Rivika Alda

Abstract

This study examined the use of English inflectional morphemes in the short-written compositions of 26 first-year Bachelor of Technology and Livelihood Education (BTLED) from a university in Caraga during the academic year 2025-2026. Specifically, it analyzed the types and frequencies of inflectional morpheme errors involving plural (-s/-es), past tense (-ed), progressive (-ing), and possessive (-’s), and classified them based on the Surface Strategy Taxonomy of Dulay, Burt, and Krashen (1982). The study employed a descriptive quantitative error analysis design supported by qualitative interpretations. The unit of analysis consisted of 26 reflective written compositions produced during an extemporaneous speech  activity. Errors were identified and classified using the Surface Strategy Taxonomy, while frequency counts and percentage distributions were used to analyze the data. The most frequent errors involved past tense inflectional morphemes, followed by plural, progressive, and possessive. The most dominant type of error was misformation, indicating that learners found it challenging to select and apply correct grammatical forms, and further suggesting that L1 transfer, overgeneralization of grammatical rules, and limited morphological awareness may have contributed to such difficulties. The study recommends strengthening explicit morphological instruction and focused writing activities.

Article Details

How to Cite
Abansa, G., Pitogo, P. I., Guitguiten, R., Roma, S. B., Villa, A., & Alda, R. (2026). Analysis of Inflectional Morpheme Use in the Written Compositions of Pre-Service Teachers. Interdisciplinary Research Review, 21(4). retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtir/article/view/265942
Section
Research Articles

References

A. A. Mardhiyah, Hastini, D. Lebagi, Darmawan, An error analysis of the inflectional markings in EFL students' academic writing, E-Journal of Linguistics 19(2) (2025) 41 – 55.

A. Y. Almakrob, N. S. Alotaibi, Lexical aspect and the L2 acquisition of English past tense morphology by Saudi EFL learners, TESOL International Journal 15(3) (2020) 58 – 82.

M. F. Dogar, T. Saleem, M. Aslam, S. Y. Khan, Exploring global linguistic nuances: analyzing region-specific inflectional morpheme frequency in ICNALE, Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 9(1) (2024) 65.

P. F. Jacobson, Y. H. Yu, Changes in English past tense use by bilingual school-age children with and without developmental language disorder, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 61(10) (2018) 2532 – 2546.

C. Resueno, K. M. D. Leon, Morpho-syntactic translations: An error analysis, Quest Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development 2(2) (2023).

R. Ibrahim Rabadi, Morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge among English language learners, Arab World English Journal 10(3) (2019) 43 – 63.

A. Fadlullah, An error analysis on students' use of inflectional morphemes at the Department of English Education of UIN SUSKA Riau, S.Pd. thesis, Dept. English Educ., Faculty of Educ. and Teacher Training, State Islamic Univ. of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia, 2023.

K. Hatifi, Error analysis of inflectional morphemes in the descriptive essay of senior English learners at Panjshir Institute of higher education, Science Education 5(6) (2024).

R. Niez, et al., Investigating inflectional morpheme errors in ESL learners' writing, Theory and Practice in Language Studies 15 (2025) 1399 – 1409.

S. P. Corder, The significance of learners' errors, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 5(1-4) (1967) 161 – 170.

H. Dulay, M. Burt, S. D. Krashen, Language Two, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1982.

W. T. R. Wahid, S. Bochari, Mukrim, Hastini, Inflectional morphological errors in EFL academic writing, FOSTER Journal of English Language Teaching 7(2) (2026) 562 – 574.

A. Khan, Transformative impacts of explicit morphological instruction on irregular inflectional acquisition in Saudi EFL learners, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11(1) (2024) 1342.

H. Oz, Morphological awareness and some implications for English language teaching, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 136 (2014) 98 – 103.

L. Selinker, Interlanguage, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 10(1-4) (1972) 209 – 232.

M. Y. Alsawsh, M. Q. Shormani, The acquisition of English irregular inflections by Yemeni L1 Arabic learners: A Universal Grammar approach, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.13816 (2026).

D. Munder, Writing errors of English as second language (ESL) learners in the 21st Philippine context, Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal 5(2) (2024) 276 – 292.

J. Kormos, The role of cognitive factors in second language writing and writing to learn a second language, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45(3) (2023) 622 – 646.

S. E. Lin, L. Chen, K. L. Chang, A comparison of the English grammatical errors of Chinese undergraduates from China and Malaysia, International Journal of Instruction 13(1) (2020) 931 – 950.

T. S. Xu, L. J. Zhang, Effects of cognitive task complexity and online planning on second language learners' argumentative writing, Frontiers in Psychology 14 (2023) 1121994.