Praying the Psalms of Anger: A Theological and Exegetical Study of Psalm 137

Main Article Content

Franklin Hutabarat
Victor Costan Montano

Abstract

The imprecatory psalms remain among the most debated passages in the Psalter and the wider canon of Scripture. These psalms contain prayers that call upon God to judge, punish, or destroy the enemies of His people. Their strong language has generated considerable discussion regarding their theological legitimacy and their place within Christian prayer. Some scholars view them as expressions of inferior Old Testament morality, while others regard them as prophetic declarations, emotional outbursts, or covenantal appeals for divine justice.
Among these psalms, Psalm 137 is particularly controversial because of its vivid description of suffering during the Babylonian exile and its graphic conclusion concerning Babylon’s destruction. This study investigates the theological nature of imprecatory prayer through an exegetical examination of Psalm 137. Employing a historical-theological methodology, the article surveys major scholarly interpretations of imprecatory psalms and analyzes Psalm 137 within its historical, literary, and covenantal context. The study argues that Psalm 137 should not be understood as a call for personal revenge but as a prayer that entrusts judgment to God. The psalm reflects the anguish of a suffering community, its unwavering commitment to Zion, and its confidence in divine justice.
The findings suggest that imprecatory psalms continue to serve a legitimate theological function by providing language through which believers may express pain, protest evil, and appeal for God’s intervention. When understood within their covenantal framework, these psalms remain relevant for contemporary Christian worship and prayer because they direct human anger away from retaliation and toward trust in the righteous judgment of God.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hutabarat, F., & Montano, V. C. (2026). Praying the Psalms of Anger: A Theological and Exegetical Study of Psalm 137. Interdisciplinary Research Review, 21(4). retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtir/article/view/266017
Section
Research Articles

References

R. G. Branch, “Encountering the Book of the Psalms, C. Hassell Bullock : book review,” Old Testament Essays, vol. 15, no. 3, 2002.

F. M. Mbon, “Deliverance in the Complaint Psalms: Religious Claim or Religious Experience,” Studia Biblica et Theologica, vol. 12, 1982.

J. M. Sprinkle, “Encountering the Book of Psalms: A Literary and Theological Introduction,” Bulletin for Biblical Research, vol. 30, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.5325/bullbiblrese.30.1.0139.

L. C. Allen and W. Brueggemann, “The Message of the Psalms: A Theological Commentary,” Journal of Biblical Literature, vol. 105, no. 4, 1986, doi: 10.2307/3261225.

J. STRIPLING, “Complaint Reveals That Roger Williams U.’s Chief Left Amid Harassment Probe.,” Chronicle of Higher Education, vol. 58, no. 2, 2011.

R. P. Gordon and W. C. Kaiser, “Toward Old Testament Ethics,” Vetus Testamentum, vol. 35, no. 2, 1985, doi: 10.2307/1518251.

W. Brueggemann, “Psalms and the life of faith: A suggested typology of function,” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, vol. 5, no. 17, 1980, doi: 10.1177/030908928000501701.

W. P. Brown, “Psalms,” in Wiley Blackwell Companion to Wisdom Literature, 2020. doi: 10.1002/9781119158288.ch4.

P. Kopeček, “Imprecatory Psalms and the Daily Prayer of the Church,” Studia Theologica, vol. 26, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.5507/sth.2023.060.

K. C. Dunham, “The Wisdom Shaping of the Psalter: From Wisdom Psalms to a Wisdom Framework,” Old Testament Essays, vol. 36, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.17159/2312-3621/2023/v36n2a9.

J. Verbruggen, “Psalms 73-150,” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 2005.

D. Simango, “A comprehensive reading of Psalm 137,” Old Testament Essays, vol. 31, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.17159/2312-3621/2018/v31n1a11.

W. A. Jarrel, “The Imprecatory Psalms,” Review & Expositor, vol. 19, no. 4, 1922, doi: 10.1177/003463732201900406.

C. Landman, “Healing the Wounded: The Psalms and Therapy,” Old Testament Essays, vol. 33, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.17159/2312-3621/2020/v33n3a17.

E. Chrusciel, “Czesław Miłosz’s Translations as ‘Re-Visioning’ of the Psalms: Poetry and Eschatology,” Religions (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.3390/rel14020174.

D. O’Connor, “Psalms 1-50, Vol. 19 Word Biblical Commentary,” Irish Theological Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 2–4, 1983, doi: 10.1177/002114008305000416.

W. E. March and P. C. Craigie, “Psalms 1-50,” Journal of Biblical Literature, vol. 104, no. 2, 1985, doi: 10.2307/3260978.

L. C. Allen, “Psalms 1-50, Psalms 51-100, Psalms 101-150. Commentary by J. W. Rogerson & J. W. Mckay. Cambridge Bible Commentary. (Cambridge University Press. 1977. 3 vols. xi, 243 pp. £8.50 hardback, £3.20 paperback/xi, 236 pp. £8.50 hardback, £3.20 paperback/xi, 193 pp. £7.90 hard back, £2.95 paperback.),” Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology, vol. 50, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1163/27725472-05001007.

A. MARAVEL, “Roger Williams and the Creation of the American Soul: Church, State, and the Birth of Liberty,” Connecticut History Review, vol. 51, no. 1, 2012, doi: 10.2307/44370117.

J. Beal, “‘The Sainted Ann Hutchinson’: Midwife of Grace (1591-1643).,” Midwifery Today, no. 122, 2017.

A. Grünert, “THE PSALTER AS A SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE IN ORIGEN’S AND BASIL’S EXEGESIS ON THE PSALMS,” Schole, vol. 17, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-2-656-671.