COMPARISON OF AODV DSDV AND DSR PROTOCOL PERFORMANCE WITH VARYING NUMBER OF NODES BY NS-2 SIMULATOR

Main Article Content

สุวิทย์ ศรีสุข
สุรศักดิ์ มังสิงห์

Abstract

Mobile ad-hoc networks (MANET) are dynamic non-structure networks for mobile data communication. These networks are linked together using multi-node routing protocol so that intermediate mobile nodes can transmit the data until it reaches the destination node. In this paper, we performed an experiment using Network Simulation-2 (NS-2) for performance comparison of three routing protocols: AODV, DSDV and DSR. A quantitative analysis was based on average amount of data transmitted to the destination node (throughput), packets received per delivery ratio, end to end delay time, and amount of data communication for route discovery, in network environment with varying the number of nodes and ratio of maximum node pairs that could be connected. In this model, the node movement was randomized, the traffic pattern was constant bit rate (cbr), and the bandwidth was not restricted. The experimental results showed that DSDV protocol performed best for sending large amount of data to destination node, and was appropriate for ad-hoc network environment with high available resources (e.g. battery and bandwidth). The AODV protocol performed best for high packet received per delivery ratio, and was appropriate for ad-hoc network environment with limited resources. The DSR protocol performed worst, and also required more data communication than the other protocols for route discovery, and was appropriate for ad-hoc network environment with no bandwidth restriction.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย

References

Anand V. & Gupta S. C. 2012. “Performance of AODV, DSR and DSDV Protocols under varying node movement.” World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies (WICT) page(s):50-55.

Perkins C. E. & Bhagwat P. 1994. “Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) for Mobile Computers.” Proceedings of the conference on Communications architectures, protocols and applications (SIGCOMM '94) Pages 234-244

Murthy C. & Manoj B.S. 2004. Ad Hoc Wireless Networks Architectures and Protocols (Third Printing) USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Maltz D. A., Broch J., Jetcheva J. & Johnson D. B. 1999. “The effects of on-demand behavior in routing protocols for multihop wireless ad hoc networks.” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications special issue on mobile and wireless networks. 17, 8 :1439 - 1453

Perkins C. E. & Royer E. M. 1999. “Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing.” Proceedings of Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (WMCSA '99)

Ahmad, Aftab. 2005. Wireless and Mobile Data Networks (First Printing). USA: John Wiley

Djenouri D., Derhab A. & Badache N. 2006. “Ad Hoc Networks Routing Protocols and Mobility.” The International Arab Journal of Information Technology. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, Vol.3, No.2, April 2006.

Issariyakul T. & Hossain E. 2012. Introduction to Network Simulator NS2 (Second Edition). Springer. .

Jiahong Wang, Takaaki Mikami, Kazuki Kanamori, Eiichiro Kodama, & Toyoo Takada. 2011. “An Effective Approach to Improving Packet Delivery Fraction of Ad Hoc Network.” Proceceedings of IMECS 2011 Vol. I, March 16-18, 2011, Hong Kong, pp681-686

Jonas Nielsen. 2002. [manet] How do you compute normalized routing load? (online).

Sebastian Rampfl. 2013. Network Simulation and its Limitations. Seminars FI / IITM / ACN SS2013, Network Architectures and Services, August 2013. PP57-63

Hussain A. Syed & Saeed A.. 2013. An Analysis of Simulators for Vehicular Ad hoc Networks. World Applied Sciences Journal 23 (8). P