Use of Bayesian, Lasso Binary Quantile Regression to Identify Suitable Habitat for Tiger Prey Species in Thap Lan National Park, Eastern Thailand 10.32526/ennrj/20/202100244

Main Article Content

Paanwaris Paansri
Warong Suksavate
Aingorn Chaiyes
Prawatsart Chanteap
Prateep Duengkae

Abstract

A Bayesian approach was used to develop binary quantile regression models featuring the lasso penalty. The models afford the advantages of all quantile regression models, such as robustness and detailed insights into covariate effects; they also handle issues associated with overfitting well. Thus, this model was used to investigate habitat suitability for the management of tiger prey species. Field data were collected from 150 sampling sites (2,416 sub-plots) in Thap Lan National Park of the Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex (DPKY) from August 2019 to March 2021. We focused on sambar deer (Rusa unicolor) and gaur (Bos gaurus) because they are the principal prey species of tigers. Vegetation was sampled for biomass and nutrient content to identify suitable habitat. The “bayesQR” package of R was used to identify habitats appropriate for these species. The correlation between forage crop biomass and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was significantly associated with tiger prey species presence. The habitat can be improved by increasing grass and forb biomasses as the prey species prefer open habitats, such as grassland and open areas of dry evergreen forest. Habitat management has ensured that the grass biomass of open forest is significantly higher than that of dense forest. In addition, the hemicellulose content of open forest was significantly greater than that of dense forest. We found that spatial modeling combined with Bayesian, lasso binary quantile regression could aid wildlife habitat management in a Thai National Park.

Article Details

How to Cite
Paansri, P., Suksavate, W., Chaiyes, A., Chanteap, P., & Duengkae, P. (2022). Use of Bayesian, Lasso Binary Quantile Regression to Identify Suitable Habitat for Tiger Prey Species in Thap Lan National Park, Eastern Thailand: 10.32526/ennrj/20/202100244. Environment and Natural Resources Journal, 20(3), 266–278. Retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ennrj/article/view/246145
Section
Original Research Articles

References

Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Parzen E, Tanabe K, Kitagawa G, editors. Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. New York, USA: Springer; 1998.

Aranha J, Enes T, Calvão A, Viana H. Shrub biomass estimates in former burnt areas using sentinel 2 images processing and classification. Forests 2020;11(5):Article No. 555.

Ash E, Kaszta Ż, Noochdumrong A, Redford T, Chanteap P, Hallam C, et al. Opportunity for Thailand’s forgotten tigers: Assessment of the Indochinese tiger Panthera tigris corbetti and its prey with camera-trap surveys. Oryx 2021;55(2):204-11.

Barboza PS, Parker KL, Hume ID. Integrative Wildlife Nutrition. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2009.

Bassett GW, Koenker RW. Strong consistency of regression quantiles and related empirical processes. Econometric Theory 1986;2(2):191-201.

Bayoumi MA, Smith AD. Response of big game winter range vegetation to fertilization. Journal of Range Management Archives 1976;29(1):44-8.

Benoit DF, Van den Poel D. Binary quantile regression: A Bayesian approach based on the asymmetric Laplace distribution. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2012;27(7):1174-88.

Benoit DF, Alhamzawi R, Yu K. Bayesian lasso binary quantile regression. Computational Statistics 2013;28(6):2861-73.

Benoit DF, Van den Poel D. bayesQR: A Bayesian approach to quantile regression. Journal of Statistical Software 2017; 76(1):1-32.

Borowik T, Pettorelli N, Sönnichsen L, Jędrzejewska B. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) as a predictor of forage availability for ungulates in forest and field habitats. European Journal of Wildlife Research 2013;59(5):675-82.

Brennan A, Cross PC, Creel S. Managing more than the mean: Using quantile regression to identify factors related to large elk groups. Journal of Applied Ecology 2015;52(6):1656-64.

Bukombe J, Kittle A, Senzota RB, Kija H, Mduma S, Fryxell JM, et al. The influence of food availability, quality and body size on patch selection of coexisting grazer ungulates in western Serengeti National Park. Wildlife Research 2019;46(1):54-63.

Cade BS, Noon BR. A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2003;1(8):412-20.

Capoani L. Variations in Nutritional Content of Key Ungulate Browse Species in Sweden [dissertation]. Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; 2019.

Cappai MG, Aboling S. Toxic or harmful components of aromatic plants in animal nutrition. In: Feed Additives. Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2020.

Chamaillé-Jammes S, Blumstein DT. A case for quantile regression in behavioral ecology: Getting more out of flight initiation distance data. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2012;66(6):985-92.

Chaiyarat R, Prasopsin S, Bhumpakphan N. Food and nutrition of Gaur (Bos gaurus CH Smith, 1827) at the edge of Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Scientific Reports 2021;11:Article No. 3281.

Chetri M. Diet analysis of gaur (Bos gaurus gaurus smith, 1827) by micro-histological analysis of fecal samples in parsa wildlife reserve, Nepal. Our Nature 2006;4(1):20-8.

Chatterjee D, Sankar K, Qureshi Q, Malik PK, Nigam P. Ranging pattern and habitat use of sambar (Rusa unicolor) in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, Western India. DSG Newsletter 2014;26:60-71.

Cook RC, Murray DL, Cook JG, Zager P, Monfort SL. Nutritional influences on breeding dynamics in elk. Canadian Journal of Zoology 2001;79(5):845-53.

Cushman SA, McGarigal K. Hierarchical, multi-scale decom-position of species-environment relationships. Landscape Ecology 2002;17(7):637-46.

Dicker RC, Coronado F, Koo D, Gibson PR. Principles of Epidemiology in Public Health Practice: An Introduction to Applied Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Atlanta, GA, USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006.

Dodge Y. The Concise Encyclopedia of Statistics. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2008.

Duangchatrasiri S, Shadshan D, Kernklang P, Jornburom P, Vinitpornsawan S, Habitat occupancy for a tiger (Panthera tigris) in the Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex. Proceedings of the 38th Wildlife in Thailand Seminar, 2017 December 14-15; Kasetsart University, Bangkok: Thailand; 2017.

Duangchatrasiri S, Jornburom P, Jinamoy S, Pattanvibool A, Hines JE, Arnold TW, et al. Impact of prey occupancy and other ecological and anthropogenic factors on tiger distribution in Thailand’s western forest complex. Ecology and Evolution 2019;9(5):2449-58.

Ensslin A, Rutten G, Pommer U, Zimmermann R, Hemp A, Fischer M. Effects of elevation and land use on the biomass of trees, shrubs and herbs at Mount Kilimanjaro. Ecosphere 2015;6(3):1-5.

Frank DA, Wallen RL, White PJ. Ungulate control of grassland production: Grazing intensity and ungulate species composition in Yellowstone Park. Ecosphere 2016;7(11):e01603.

González-Hernández MP, Silva-Pando FJ. Nutritional attributes of understory plants known as components of deer diets. Journal of Range Management Archives 1999;52(2):132-8.

Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, Ilyushchenko S, Thau D, Moore R. Google earth engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment 2017;202:18-27.

Hoffmann WA. Fire and population dynamics of woody plants in a neotropical savanna: Matrix model projections. Ecology 1999;80(4):1354-69.

Holechek JL. Comparative contribution of grasses, forbs, and shrubs to the nutrition of range ungulates. Rangelands Archives 1984;6(6):261-3.

Holechek JL, Pieper RD, Herbel CH. Range Management: Principles and Practices. 3rd ed. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall; 1998.

Jasra AW, Johnson DE. Nutritional constraints on the productivity of sheep and goats grazing a degraded grassland of highland Balochistan, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research 2000;16(1):64-7.

Ji Y, Lin N, Zhang B. Model selection in binary and tobit quantile regression using the Gibbs sampler. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2012;56(4):827-39.

John OO. Robustness of quantile regression to outliers. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics 2015;3(2):86-8.

Kaur R. Carbon Pool Assessment in Govind Wildlife Sanctuary and National Park [dissertation]. Dehradun: Forestry and Ecology Division, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing; 2007.

Koenker R, Bassett Jr G. Robust tests for heteroscedasticity based on regression quantiles. Econometrica 1982:50(1);43-61.

Kordas G. Smoothed binary regression quantiles. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2006;21(3):387-407.

Krause J, Ruxton GD, Ruxton G, Ruxton IG. Living in Groups. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2002.

Lamont BG, Monteith KL, Merkle JA, Mong TW, Albeke SE, Hayes MM, et al. Multi‐scale habitat selection of elk in response to beetle‐killed forest. The Journal of Wildlife Management 2019;83(3):679-93.

Li J, Mao X. Comparison of canopy closure estimation of plantations using parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric models based on GF-1 remote sensing images. Forests 2020;11(5):Article No. 597.

Li Q, Lin N, Xi R. Bayesian regularized quantile regression. Bayesian Analysis 2010;5(3):533-56.

Lynam AJ, Tantipisanuh N, Chutipong W, Ngoprasert D, Baker MC, Cutter P, et al. Comparative sensitivity to environmental variation and human disturbance of Asian tapirs (Tapirus indicus) and other wild ungulates in Thailand. Integrative Zoology 2012;7(4):389-99.

Manski CF. Semiparametric analysis of discrete response: Asymptotic properties of the maximum score estimator. Journal of Econometrics 1985;27(3):313-33.

McCullagh P, Nelder J. Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 2019.

McShea WJ, Davies SJ, Bhumpakphan N. The Ecology and Conservation of Seasonally Dry Forests in Asia. Washinton, DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press; 2011.

Mobashar M, Habib G, Anjum MI, Gul I, Ahmad N, Moses A, et al. Herbage production and nutritive value of alpine pastures in upper Kaghan valley, Khyber Pakhtunkhawa, Pakistan. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 2017;27(5):1472-8.

Moreno-de las Heras M, Díaz-Sierra R, Turnbull L, Wainwright J. Assessing vegetation structure and ANPP dynamics in a grassland-shrubland Chihuahuan ecotone using NDVI-rainfall relationships. Biogeosciences Discussions 2015;12(1):51-92.

Mountousis I, Papanikolaou K, Stanogias G, Chatzitheodoridis F, Roukos C. Seasonal variation of chemical composition and dry matter digestibility of rangelands in NW Greece. Journal of Central European Agriculture 2008;9(3):547-55.

Muggeo VM, Sciandra M, Tomasello A, Calvo S. Estimating growth charts via nonparametric quantile regression: A practical framework with application in ecology. Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 2013;20(4):519-31.

Ngoprasert D, Gale GA. The status of Tiger and Dhole and their Prey in the Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex. Proceedings of the 38th Wildlife in Thailand Seminar, 2017 December 14-15; Kasetsart University, Bangkok: Thailand; 2017.

Ofstad EG, Herfindal I, Solberg EJ, Seather BE. Home ranges, habitat and body mass: Simple correlates of home range size in ungulates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2016;283(1845):Article No. 1234.

Paansri P, Sangprom N, Suksavate W, Chaiyes A, Duengkae P. Spatial modeling of forage crops for tiger prey species in the area surrounding highway 304 in the Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex. Environment and Natural Resources Journal 2021;19(3):220-9.

Pattanakiat S. Vegetation pattern and soil relationship in a tropical grassland of Khao Yai National Park. Bangkok, Thailand: FAO; 1988. (in Thai).

Randle M, Stevens N, Midgley G. Comparing the differential effects of canopy shading by Dichrostachys cinerea and Terminalia sericea on grass biomass. South African Journal of Botany 2018;119:271-7.

Rai D. Opinion survey on the ecology of Sambar, Rusa unicolor (Artiodactyla, Cervidae) and its status with respect to crop damage in districts Jhunjhunu and Churu, Rajasthan (India). Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2019;11(2):468-77.

Rautiainen H, Bergvall UA, Felton AM, Tigabu M, Kjellander P. Nutritional niche separation between native roe deer and the nonnative fallow deer: A test of interspecific competition. Mammal Research 2021;66(3):1-13.

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.

Royal Forest Department, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (RFD). Preparation of Information on Forest Area 2017-2018. Bangkok, Thailand: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment; 2018.

Sage RF, Kubien DS. Quo vadis C 4? An ecophysiological perspective on global change and the future of C 4 plants. Photosynthesis Research 2003;77(2):209-25.

Seven PT, Cerci IH. Relationships between nutrient composition and feed digestibility determined with enzyme and nylon bag (in situ) techniques in feed resources. Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine 2006;9(2):107-13.

Simcharoen A, Savini T, Gale GA, Roche E, Chimchome V, Smith JL. Ecological factors that influence sambar (Rusa unicolor) distribution and abundance in western Thailand: Implications for tiger conservation. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 2014; 62:100-6.

Tajchman K, Steiner-Bogdaszewska Ż, Żółkiewski P. Requirements and role of selected micro and macro elements in nutrition of cervids (Cervidae). Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 2018;16(6):7669-86

Tschöpe O, Wallschläger D, Burkart M, Tielbörger K. Managing open habitats by wild ungulate browsing and grazing: A case‐study in North‐Eastern Germany. Applied Vegetation Science 2011;14(2):200-9.

Tufarelli V, Cazzato E, Ficco A, Laudadio V. Evaluation of chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of Appennine pasture plants using yak (Bos grunniens) rumen fluid or faecal extract as inoculum source. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2010;23(12):1587-93.

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Symposium: Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 1991;74(10):3583-97.

Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th ed. New York, USA: Springer; 2013.

Verme LJ, Ullrey DE. Feeding and nutrition of deer. Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of Ruminants 1972;3:275-91

Wallmo OC, Carpenter LH, Regelin WL, Gill RB, Baker DL. Evaluation of deer habitat on a nutritional basis. Journal of Range Management 1977;30(2):122-7.

Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2014;14(1):1-3.

Widenfalk O, Weslien J. Plant species richness in managed boreal forests: Effects of stand succession and thinning. Forest Ecology and Management 2009;257(5):1386-94.

Wu W, De Pauw E, Helldén U. Assessing woody biomass in African tropical savannahs by multiscale remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2013;34(13):4525-49.