Improving the Production Process of Line Gen for Furniture Production

Main Article Content

Suphattra Sriyanalugsana
Kitikul Punsri

Abstract

Furniture is an important part of home and condo decoration. The case study factory is a furniture factory where the Line Gen production process is responsible for producing sample furniture as well as managing various repairs and work that is returned for repairs. The production process focuses on the speed of production. Currently, there are problems with returns and rejected work in the production process of Line Gen. There were errors in determining delivery dates and preparing raw materials for production, including the lack of clear coordination among each relevant department, resulting in production work exceeding the delivery deadline. There were thus delays in the production of furniture. Therefore, in order to solve these problems, this research has prepared a standard work manual (Work Instructions: WI) and a production sequence plan checklist, including capacity analysis. The results show that before the improvement, 80 returned jobs were generated, of which 38 exceeded the transfer date of 47.5%, and the number of days beyond the average transfer period was 2.42 days. After the improvement, 68 jobs were returned, 17 of which exceeded the transfer deadline (25%), and the days beyond the transfer deadline decreased on average to 1.47 days. In the case of rejecting jobs before improvement, there was a total of 96 jobs, 77 of which were beyond the transfer date of 80.2%, and the number of days beyond the average transfer period was 4.56 days. After improvements, there were 98 rejected jobs, with 49 jobs exceeding 50% of the transfer date, and we were able to reduce the average transfer overdue days to 2.24 days.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sriyanalugsana, S. ., & Punsri , K. . (2024). Improving the Production Process of Line Gen for Furniture Production. Thai Industrial Engineering Network Journal, 10(1), 20–32. Retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ienj/article/view/253172
Section
Research and Review Article

References

Murali CS, Prabukarthi A. Productivity improvement in furniture industry using lean tools and process simulation. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management. 2020; 30(2): 214-233.

Hartini S, Wicaksono PA, Prastawa H, Hadyan AF. The Environmental Impact Assessment of Furniture Production Process Using the Life Cycle Assessment. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019; 598(1): p. 012078. IOP Publishing.

Werner F, Nebel B. Wood & other renewable resources (subject editor: Jörg Schweinle). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2007;12: 462-463.

Neyestani, B. (2017). Seven basic tools of quality control: The appropriate techniques for solving quality problems in the organizations. Available at SSRN 2955721.

Srinivasu R, Reddy GS, Rikkula SR. Utility of quality control tools and statistical process control to improve the productivity and quality in an industry. International Journal of Reviews in Computing. 2011; 5(3): 15-20.

ศุภชัย นาทะพันธ์. การควบคุมคุณภาพ. กรุงเทพมหานคร: ซีเอ็ดยูเคชั่น จำกัด; 2551.

เรืองลักษณ์ บุตรเพ็ชร, จุฑาวรรณ อ้นสุวรรณ และธิดาเดียว มยุรีสวรรค์. เครื่องมือควบคุม คุณภาพ 7 ชนิด (7 Quality Control Tools). [อินเทอร์เน็ต]. 2560 [เข้าถึงเมื่อ12 กุมภาพันธ์ 2567]. เข้าถึงได้จาก chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://sc2.kku.ac.th/stat/statweb/images/Eventpic/60/Seminar/02_13_-7-.pdf

ศิริพงษ์ ตั้งยั่งยืน. การลดของเสียในโรงงานผลิตเส้นก๋วยเตี๋ยว [วิทยานิพนธ์ ปริญญาบริหารธุรกิจการจัดการอุตสาหกรรม]. กรุงเทพฯ; สถาบันเทคโนโลยีไทย-ญี่ปุ่น; 2557.

Magar VM, Shinde VB. Application of 7 quality control (7QC) tools for continuous improvement of manufacturing processes. International Journal of engineering research and general science. 2014; 2(4): 364-371.

Leavengood SA, Reeb JE Pareto analysis and check sheets. Statistical process control; 2002. Part 3:1-6.

Maravelias CT, Sung C. Integration of production planning and scheduling: Overview, challenges and opportunities. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 2009; 33(12): 1919-1930.

วชิรพงษ์ สาลีสิงห์. การจัดลำดับงานโดยกฎความสำคัญ. Productivity World. 2546; 8 (44): 42-48.

สุเทพ บุตรดี, ชัยวัฒน์ นมทอง และปัญจพร แพใหญ่. วิธีการจัดตารางการผลิตแบบฮิวริสติกแบบผสมเพื่อประสิทธิภาพการผลิตสูงสุด. เอกสารสืบเนื่องจากการประชุมวิชาการข่ายงานวิศวกรรมอุตสาหการประจำปี พ.ศ. 2550; 24-26 ตุลาคม 2550; มหาวิทยาลัยสงขลานครินทร์, สงขลา. 2550; หน้า1421-1426.